In my honest opinion: if TA does not have U16, the players that are not making travel rosters for U16/17, should be allow to play high school and/or clubs. They should not be practicing all year long without playing any real games.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
US Soccer Needs to Add U16 DA - How do we do it?
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIn my honest opinion: if TA does not have U16, the players that are not making travel rosters for U16/17, should be allow to play high school and/or clubs. They should not be practicing all year long without playing any real games.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIn my honest opinion: if TA does not have U16, the players that are not making travel rosters for U16/17, should be allow to play high school and/or clubs. They should not be practicing all year long without playing any real games.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIn my honest opinion: if TA does not have U16, the players that are not making travel rosters for U16/17, should be allow to play high school and/or clubs. They should not be practicing all year long without playing any real games.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
It's Not How Good They Are Its How Big they are
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBecause the net gets smaller and smaller the older players get. US Soccer is looking for future national team players. Those 3 were the only younger ones at this time. Next year, if some of the ones cut improve a lot and pass others by, they will make the roster next year. The very best possible national team talent will make it year by year and the list will change year by year. It isn’t about making money. It’s about only taking the very best players.
There is a lot of negative people out there on this Forum. I've heard the very same thing that MLS Professionals were good but would not be noticed at age 13 but become professionals at 21 and 22 after college. If a leading country in Soccer like Brazil feels it is too early to get rid of players because of their body development is not done, why would not US Soccer who could not even get in the World Cup go all out to keep the players going? I too feel US Soccer is failing and this is one area of many they are failing. If I am failing I look at all possibilities to improve and US Soccer is not. The DA Academies practice 4 days a week, they have video and they measure each player - it is very structured vs. pre-Academies only practice 3 days a week as a rule, no video and not as structured.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt's not how good they are it is how big they are. Our coach even said the U15 kids are too small! U17 are men and fully developed - the U15 going to U16 are kids. Kids can't play with men.
There is a lot of negative people out there on this Forum. I've heard the very same thing that MLS Professionals were good but would not be noticed at age 13 but become professionals at 21 and 22 after college. If a leading country in Soccer like Brazil feels it is too early to get rid of players because of their body development is not done, why would not US Soccer who could not even get in the World Cup go all out to keep the players going? I too feel US Soccer is failing and this is one area of many they are failing. If I am failing I look at all possibilities to improve and US Soccer is not. The DA Academies practice 4 days a week, they have video and they measure each player - it is very structured vs. pre-Academies only practice 3 days a week as a rule, no video and not as structured.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe late younger ones can try out next year when they’ll have the advantage of being older. The true cream rises to the top in 2 year age bands.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEvery player will G̲e̲t̲ to have an advantage every other year. Smart way to do it. Gives opportunity but weeds out the players that won’t make it anyway.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostExactly. Skilled smaller/younger players will (or should anyway) move up. The league only cares about those players regardless. If you're not skilled you won't move up no matter how big or old you are. You might get in just based on numbers the next year, but do you want to stick around and find out? It's a gamble that might not be worth taking.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostA gamble to get skunked twenty five times a year. Parents on the sidelines eager for the first 10 minutes then back on their iphones or getting scooby snacks from their cars. Sullen HS kids with polyester DA tshirts that Tommy thinks means they are on the mock trial team.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe late younger ones can try out next year when they’ll have the advantage of being older. The true cream rises to the top in 2 year age bands.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI see failure in the US Soccer Development Academy forcing over half the players out of the program when they are 14 and 15 years old by combining U16 and U17. On our team only 3 players out of 18 are remaining in the Development Academy from U15 to the U16/U17 Team - that's 83% of the best players being forced out of US Soccer if other teams pick like our team does. A top Corinthians Development Coach stated that the worst player at 13 and 14 years old can be the best player at 15 and 16 years old due to growth and life changes given the have adequate technical skills. The point being Brazil cultivates the age group and the US Soccer pushes them out of the program at age 14 and 15 years old. With the change of leadership, I would expect a change but I have not seen one yet. It looks to be a lot of talk and no action from US Soccer. BTW, 95% of the US Teams come from the Development Academy Program.
How do we get US Soccer's Attention?
The U18/U19 combination is not that bad due to many of the boys go to College at U19 but they should be separated too; however, I think the priority should be U16.
Additionally, the Academies should like to have additional revenue of another 18 players.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYour kid got cut because they weren't good enough so the system should be changed just for you?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThat response is disgusting and completely the problem- you obviously feel threatened (if your kid is even involved.) those of us who actually get it and have kids that have a chance- not you d1ckhead poster- have taken our children overseas or out of country so they can really train without the current us education constructs....we will never reach international relevance at our youth and men’s national team level until places like img academy or the like exist across the country and the parents of the talented kids see the light and put their children in that kind of environment full time and challenge the coaches to “burn the kids out”, here’s a hint the ones that really love the sport and want to be great won’t burn out and the great thing is there is a place for those who “do”- our highschool and club structure...
- Quote
Comment
Comment