What a waste. There are teams playing four games in 24hrs. This is so bad for development.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nwcl 2016
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhat a waste. There are teams playing four games in 24hrs. This is so bad for development.
Or perhaps you really meant "My kid's team is getting throttle mercilessly. This isn't good for development".
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt's not about development. That's what you do in training. This is about competition. Don't like it, don't participate.
Or perhaps you really meant "My kid's team is getting throttle mercilessly. This isn't good for development".
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt's not about development. That's what you do in training. This is about competition. Don't like it, don't participate.
Or perhaps you really meant "My kid's team is getting throttle mercilessly. This isn't good for development".
The comment above is why other countries laugh at us. We are azz backwards here. Four 70 minute games in 24 hours is so bad for player development. Those kids actually got worse this weekend.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
NWCL is not very good any longer. Doesn't have the best Seattle teams and Oregon teams are all mediocre. It's now just a money grab, and not a very good one.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNWCL is not very good any longer. Doesn't have the best Seattle teams and Oregon teams are all mediocre. It's now just a money grab, and not a very good one.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt used to be fun for top Oregon teams to test their skills against quality Seattle clubs and the period good BC teams. But now it's so watered down. Oregon teams traveled to Seattle to play 4 Oregon teams. What a waste.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFirst time participant - we didn't play any Oregon teams. Some variability in competition (1 really tough, 1 about par with us, 1 quite weak) great fields 2 out of 3 games (1 out of 3 was so-so) . . . was a good experience for us. Something we will evaluate year-to-year, but so far so good and it didn't look any of the Oregon teams in our age had an easy time of it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThat is great. But the competition is not that good. Weaker than ever in its history. if you enjoyed it then it worked for your team.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;1884330]Lol.
The comment above is why other countries laugh at us. We are azz backwards here. Four 70 minute games in 24 hours is so bad for player development. Those kids actually got worse this weekend.[/QUOTE
Come on its not like the teams played 24hrs straight with out a break. If your team can't handle playing two games in one day you might want to make sure your kids spend alittle more time on their electronic devices. This generation is getting so lazy and has a excuse for everything.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;1884458]Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLol.
The comment above is why other countries laugh at us. We are azz backwards here. Four 70 minute games in 24 hours is so bad for player development. Those kids actually got worse this weekend.[/QUOTE
Come on its not like the teams played 24hrs straight with out a break. If your team can't handle playing two games in one day you might want to make sure your kids spend alittle more time on their electronic devices. This generation is getting so lazy and has a excuse for everything.
If your coach is taking the team from tournament to tournament then time to find a new coach. The old way doesn't work.
- Quote
Comment
Comment