Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oregon ECNL results to date

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    They are getting athletic money. Obviously not that much given the size of the rosters but it is an excellent school and will be a great experience.
    With the budget crisis in California, I've heard public schools there don't offer much at all. They give to instate as they are so much cheaper.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      With the budget crisis in California, I've heard public schools there don't offer much at all. They give to instate as they are so much cheaper.
      This shows your ignorance. Money isn't the issue. It is number of scholarships. 14 full scholarships per team at any given time. Typically California schools can spend two of those on out of state kids, while other state's schools might spend all 14 on out of state, I have been told that is not allowed in California. As a result, most California state school rosters are mostly Cali kids. So let's say there are six out-of-state kids, then on average they are each getting 1/3 of a scholarship. In the PAC12 that is still a good offer. It also means a well deserved congrats to those kids for breaking into a California state school roster, much less pac12, great accomplishment to both of them.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        That's what's happening. Family connection. Having an extra practice player isn't that big of a burden for the team.
        But the girls are not related right? I don't believe you.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          With the budget crisis in California, I've heard public schools there don't offer much at all. They give to instate as they are so much cheaper.
          You heard incorrectly. Actually you made that up but whatever

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            This shows your ignorance. Money isn't the issue. It is number of scholarships. 14 full scholarships per team at any given time. Typically California schools can spend two of those on out of state kids, while other state's schools might spend all 14 on out of state, I have been told that is not allowed in California. As a result, most California state school rosters are mostly Cali kids. So let's say there are six out-of-state kids, then on average they are each getting 1/3 of a scholarship. In the PAC12 that is still a good offer. It also means a well deserved congrats to those kids for breaking into a California state school roster, much less pac12, great accomplishment to both of them.
            And why do you think that California schools limit their out of state scholarships? Lack of money you dufus. Thanks for making my point and making yourself look like a fool in the process.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              You heard incorrectly. Actually you made that up but whatever
              Sorry, you are the one is is clueless. But wish all you want.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                But the girls are not related right? I don't believe you.
                I don't care if you believe me or not. Has nothing to do with the girls being related. One of them is going due to relationship with AD. Not a very good player and likely will only be on the practice squad. But he, can brag to the fellow students that she's on the team.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  I don't care if you believe me or not. Has nothing to do with the girls being related. One of them is going due to relationship with AD. Not a very good player and likely will only be on the practice squad. But he, can brag to the fellow students that she's on the team.
                  You come across as very very jealous. Is that the tone you were aiming for?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    You come across as very very jealous. Is that the tone you were aiming for?
                    I was aiming to come across smarter than you. Mission easily accomplished.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      I was aiming to come across smarter than you. Mission easily accomplished.
                      That is fairly subjective. I disagree with you. What now, more name calling?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        I don't care if you believe me or not. Has nothing to do with the girls being related. One of them is going due to relationship with AD. Not a very good player and likely will only be on the practice squad. But he, can brag to the fellow students that she's on the team.

                        This is garbage and a bunch of malarky. Kid is very good player.
                        I hope she goes to Cal and lights it up to show little bitter people like you what she is capable of.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          You come across as very very jealous. Is that the tone you were aiming for?
                          Sorry that facts are hard for you. When you don't like the facts, you resort to name calling.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            This is garbage and a bunch of malarky. Kid is very good player.
                            I hope she goes to Cal and lights it up to show little bitter people like you what she is capable of.
                            Well, hope is a good thing. It's the best of things. You can hope all you want.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Sorry that facts are hard for you. When you don't like the facts, you resort to name calling.
                              Fail.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                That is fairly subjective. I disagree with you. What now, more name calling?
                                Well I didn't want to go there but yes, you're also a D-bag.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X