Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FCSC new G99 team
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postmy daughters been playing for Salmon Creek for 5 years and I have not heard any promises of turf fields, maybe before we got there.Joe has been coaching my daughter's team so I think we would have heard about it.quit trying to stir up drama when there's nothing there. The
Timber minions must be desperate if that's all you can come up with.
FCSC is now completely surrounded by Pacific SC/FC clubs and the pool of players from rec on up is shrinking. Time for them to join Pacific FC...
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere was a plan put together 5+ years ago to build a turf field at HB Fuller. There is even a model of the proposed field stored in the FCSC office at Salmon Creek Indoor. It was rolled out again at the AGM 2 years ago (the one where only 3 people attended). FCSC would need to save up another $700M to make it happen and, with the small size of the club, that's not going to happen any time soon.
FCSC is now completely surrounded by Pacific SC/FC clubs and the pool of players from rec on up is shrinking. Time for them to join Pacific FC...
If I remember correctly they scrapped the project because the permitting process required that it be available to all sports and all residents since it was a public facility. The ROI just didn't add up for SCSC.
Honest question: Why would Pacific want anything to do with FCSC?
IMO Pacific is just as competitive for the vast majority of teams. Their boys side is superior and all for a fraction of the cost of FCSC. I could maybe see Salmon Creek Rec and Pacific aligning but FCSC (advanced comp) would be an anchor. Plus they'd have to pay for a DOC & family which they've demonstrated they don't need. Pacific is doing just fine. It would be a huge mistake to align with FCSC.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post$700k I hope ... cuz that would be one heck of a complex for $700m!
If I remember correctly they scrapped the project because the permitting process required that it be available to all sports and all residents since it was a public facility. The ROI just didn't add up for SCSC.
Honest question: Why would Pacific want anything to do with FCSC?
IMO Pacific is just as competitive for the vast majority of teams. Their boys side is superior and all for a fraction of the cost of FCSC. I could maybe see Salmon Creek Rec and Pacific aligning but FCSC (advanced comp) would be an anchor. Plus they'd have to pay for a DOC & family which they've demonstrated they don't need. Pacific is doing just fine. It would be a huge mistake to align with FCSC.
The sad truth though is back before pacific started there were people saying FCSC should basically focus on the same area that Pacific is excelling at currently. That level of player that wants to pay a little less, and be able to play multiple sports and perhaps isn't as high level as the top players. however, FCSC's obsession with trying to compete with Washington Timbers kept them from going that route, and now pacific has a pretty strong lock on that middle group, and washington timbers is still the biggest in town, and FCSC is still struggling to put together multiple teams.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAgree, Pacific doesn't need FCSC but FCSC need pacific. I thought it was great though last year when they had "joint" tryouts for u10 and fcsc ended up with 0 girls teams because Pacific took all the girls, well played pacific, well played.
The sad truth though is back before pacific started there were people saying FCSC should basically focus on the same area that Pacific is excelling at currently. That level of player that wants to pay a little less, and be able to play multiple sports and perhaps isn't as high level as the top players. however, FCSC's obsession with trying to compete with Washington Timbers kept them from going that route, and now pacific has a pretty strong lock on that middle group, and washington timbers is still the biggest in town, and FCSC is still struggling to put together multiple teams.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOn the bright side, "Somebody has to bring up the rear"!
I know at the 00 age group, my daughter and her friends cringe when they have to play FCSC as they are one of the only teams we can't seem to beat. My DDs team has never played a Pacific team yet in any tournaments or league play.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostRumor has it FCSC is picking up a new G99 team and coach?. Any truth? Any details would be helpful.
http://nemesis99.salmoncreeksoccer.com/
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Not sure what the big deal is. Bridlemiles 2nd team may be getting a new coach too? Maybe we should post that too?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostInteresting ...the original Nemesis 99 is returning to the OPL while the new Nemesis 99 or B-team is going to OYSA. Actually makes sense.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhat about it makes sense? The only teams worth playing in OPL are FC and THUSC, and I've got a feeling at least one of those will go oysa this fall. What a waste.
Maybe the team that comfortably won OYSA spring league (most goals, most wins, most points, highest GD) is looking for more challenges elsewhere.
- Quote
Comment
Comment