I am curious why no one has noted that Linus Rhode, director of coaching at Surf, was 'helping out" at the pre-tryout camp for Jesuit. Hmm....
-
-
Congrats Cheaters! Feel good about your hollow trophy.
I hate to see cheaters win, but Karma has a way of making the universe balanced. I have a feeling the justice will come to this program sooner than later.
what a bunch of sh-t bags to rig a HS sports system and take away opportunities for legit schoolsComment
-
Its there 16 title. I think they are just goodComment
-
I’m rooting for you guys to win the ECNL National Title for Surf or Thorns this year. Can you just combine teams? I just need titles dammit im counting on you. Don’t care of the age, if they professionally, if its Alex Morgan I need those damn titles.Originally posted by Guest View Post
also RJ enjoy tonight need your pre algebra home work needs to get done.
On Monday we got your 5 question multiple questions test as the final.
The teacher just emailed you all the answers. With this education system I see those girls becoming doctors and lawyers before going to college. They are the future of the world signed SF your favorite teachers.Comment
-
Did you see Jesuit won another state title today. Pretty awsome.
Surf will suck again this year
Comment
-
I heard the new Freshmen are going to be the next neuroscientists and cure cancer. They are so great Stanford wants them because they will win the Humanitarian awards for being great human beings like their parents.Originally posted by Guest View Post
Damn State Title in their Freshmen year, Stanford Acceptance's with a D-1 scholarship, Internship at Google, United Nations Good Ambassador award.
You guys please stop winning and share the wealth.Comment
-
-
Hope you guys are not celebrating with OSAA officials and their Board we need to talk to them or have you bought them off already with the money made this year?Originally posted by Guest View Post
Comment
-
Now we are talking, build these amazing young girls up !!Originally posted by Guest View PostComment
-
If you have any information about club directors helping recruit for SF, contact OSAA.Originally posted by Guest View Post
The contact information is on the OSAA website.Comment
-
The OSAA handbook defines recruiting as follows:
8.7. Undue Influence.
Rule: Despite compliance with the other provisions of these Rules, any student who attends a member high school as a result of undue influence as defined in these Rules, is ineligible for a minimum of one year. Violation of the Undue Influence Rule can also result in penalties to the school, athletic program, and ineligibility for a coach set out in Rule 5. The penalty and any additional period of ineligibility will be determined by the Executive Director based on a consideration of the number of violations involved, the number of student-athletes involved, the nature of the violation(s), the individual(s) responsible for the violation(s), and the extent to which the violation may have been knowing, deliberate, or in reckless disregard of the provisions of this rule and the commentary that accompanies this rule.
For purposes of this Rule, "undue influence" is the attempt by any person (including but not limited to coaches, boosters, teachers, administrators, students, parents, alumni) to induce a student (via in-person contact, phone, text, social media platforms, email, or the like) to attend a public or private member school or become eligible to represent a public or private school for purposes of athletic or activities participation.
(a) Undue influence includes, but is not limited to the offer or acceptance of:
(1) Recruiting to a particular school for the purposes of athletic or activities participation.
(2) Financial assistance (including free or reduced tuition) provided based on a student’s potential or participation in OSAA-sanctioned activities.
(3) Promising employment or any other financial benefit to the student or any member of the student's family, including payment for work that is not performed or that is in excess of the amount regularly paid for such service.
(4) Free or reduced rent for families, including residence with any school connected person.
(5) Transportation by any school connected person.
(6) Any privilege not afforded to non-athletes.
(7) Help in securing or promising a college athletic scholarship.
It shall not be considered undue influence for authorized representatives of a private high school to contact students attending private feeder schools to induce their attendance at the private high school or for authorized representatives of public high schools to so contact students within that public high school's attendance boundaries.
Rationale: The objective of the Undue Influence rule is to prevent member schools, and persons affiliated with a member school, from exerting an undue influence on students with a goal of securing or retaining a student for athletic or activities purposes. This rule serves the substantial interests of Association members of prioritizing academics over competition, protecting young students from exploitation, ensuring an even playing field among competing schools, providing for equitable competition in Association athletics and activities, and protecting the physical welfare of students engaging in contact sports.
1. Q. Does the undue influence rule apply only during the Association Year?
A. No. The undue influence rule applies at all times.
2. Q. Does the undue influence rule apply prior to attending high school?
A. Yes.
3. Q. Is it considered undue influence to initiate contact with a student from another school at any game or contest for the purpose of discussing athletic or activities programs?
A. Yes. Any contact initiated by a coach or other school representative with a student from another school for the purpose of athletic or activities recruitment is considered undue influence.
4. Q. Is it considered undue influence for a school to send recruiting letters to students who already are enrolled in a high school?
A. Yes.
5. Q. Is it considered undue influence for a private school to send general information letters to students enrolled in public middle schools?
A. Yes. Private schools are only allowed to send general information letters to large groups of students in their own feeder systems. Private schools are not allowed to send a general information letter to a student currently enrolled in a public feeder school unless the family of the student has specifically requested information about the private school.
6. Q. Is it considered undue influence for a school representative to discuss that school's athletic or activities program with a visiting student?
A. It would not be considered undue influence if the student had contacted the school first to request information about the athletic or activities program.
7. Q. Is it considered undue influence for a school representative to contact an athlete or activities participant in a multiple high school district about enrolling in another school in that district primarily for the purpose of athletics or activities?
A. Yes.
8. Q. What are other examples of undue influence?
A. If selected individuals are offered free transportation, invited to attend practice or games, or offered or awarded any privileges or considerations not offered to other students, whether athletes or non-athletes, those offers, or awards would be examples of undue influence.
9. Q. What are some allowable practices that would not be considered undue influence?
A. 1) Visits to junior high and/or middle schools by invitation, conducted by approved school representatives.
2) Open houses.
3) Broad-based informational mailings to students in that school’s feeder system.
4) Sports clinics with open registration.
10. Q. Is it permissible for a school to have “Sports Night” or a similar event at which all members of youth teams in that school’s feeder system are allowed free entry to athletic contests at the school?
A. So long as free entry is afforded to ALL team members and not limited to selected athletes, such an event would not be considered a violation of the Undue Influence rule.
11. Q. Is it considered undue influence if a private school sends information to individual elementary/middle school athletes or activities participants?
A. Yes. Informational materials may be sent by a private school to ALL the team members and/or participants in that school’s feeder system but may not be sent only to an individual athlete or activities participants unless the family of the student has specifically requested information about the private school.
If you have any information about SF or RJ recruiting for Jesuit women’s soccer contact OSAA.
The contact information can be found on the website.Comment
-
Is it possible Jesuit is just good again, like the other 15 times.Comment
-
Yes. That does not change the fact that under OSAA guidelines recruiting players is against the rules.Originally posted by Guest View Post
Whether a team is “good” or “bad” is irrelevant.
If anyone has any information regarding a hs team recruiting players, contact OSAA.
The contact information can be found on the OSAA website.Comment
-
Jesuit is good. That’s the point. They are good because literally every player has been recruited and hand picked to attend the school on the sole basis of being good at the sport.Originally posted by Guest View Post
Every other school in the league and conference has to build a program based on who shows up. Not Jesuit. They use the ECNL coaches and directors to feed their program with kids. It’s all based on promises to kids and parent that they will help get their kids into college programs.
it works. But it is clearly against OSAA guidelines. What we are all saying is that it shouldn’t be allowed.
Jesuit is a great program, built on cheating and recruiting and having an unfair advantage against all other programs.
How could anyone possibly defend this?! It’s so stupid. Fennah’s teams have literally only lost a couple of games in over a decade. This is not a sign of a great coach, it’s a sign of rigged system that allows a program to cheat.
Literally no one cares that Jesuit won. Even the girls have to know that they are on a team that has a clear advantage to their opponents. How does it feel like a real victory?
Grant are the true champions. They did it the right way! So did West Linn, so did Beaverton. Congrats to all the semi finalists! Jesuit is an asterisk champion.
all of us that know what they do to win will never recognize their victories.
F U C K Cheaters
Comment
-
And it is just ultra-sad to me that Jesuit gets tolls place in the record books while doing this.Originally posted by Guest View Post
look at Potter replacing Dewey Sullivan as the winningest football coach in Oregon HS school history. For all of you that don’t know Dewey Sullivan was a teacher who coached at Dayton High School and won a lot of games and a few championships. The right way! Not by recruiting, not by cheating, but by good old fashioned coaching. Something these Jesuit liars and cheaters could never do.
I use this as an example of how a school that caters to the entitled people is allowed to buy wins and trophies.
It is disgusting and is so far away from the what the purity of high school sports should be. But hey, this is who were are now. A state that acts like we want fairness and equality, but will sell out with the first check to cash.
OSAA is a joke. These clowns has sat back and allowed a fake high school to steal championships from the real schools that win the way high schools should win. With coaching and pride. Not checks and liesComment
Comment