Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Academy soccer

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Academy soccer

    I have a question:
    Why is soccer free for the boys in the Timbers Academy, and I have to pay for my daughter in the Thorns academy?

    #2
    Originally posted by Guest View Post
    I have a question:
    Why is soccer free for the boys in the Timbers Academy, and I have to pay for my daughter in the Thorns academy?
    MP is going to sell the Thorns, but he still owns both org’s.

    the simple answer is sexism.

    Comment


      #3
      The answer is actually very simple. Timber academy is part of a league ran by the MLS clubs, and part of their agreement to have this league is it has to be fully subsidized. The Thorns are part of the ECNL which has no such agreement. Really is that simple.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Guest View Post
        The answer is actually very simple. Timber academy is part of a league ran by the MLS clubs, and part of their agreement to have this league is it has to be fully subsidized. The Thorns are part of the ECNL which has no such agreement. Really is that simple.
        Not true. There is no rule requiring MLS academies be fully subsidized. It is up to each of the individual MLS club to decide.

        It’s sexism

        Comment


          #5
          Don’t do it. Thorns Academy is TOXIC

          Comment


            #6
            It comes down to money Timbers make more

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Guest View Post
              It comes down to money Timbers make more
              Thorns have been profitable since day one, Thorns make the most money out of any club in the league, and when MP sells the Thorns their value is going to be the 1st or 2nd highest in all of the all NWSL. it’s sexism.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Guest View Post

                Thorns have been profitable since day one, Thorns make the most money out of any club in the league, and when MP sells the Thorns their value is going to be the 1st or 2nd highest in all of the all NWSL. it’s sexism.
                Context is important. Being the most profitable NWSL club is like being the least profitable MLS club divided by 10.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Guest View Post

                  Not true. There is no rule requiring MLS academies be fully subsidized. It is up to each of the individual MLS club to decide.

                  It’s sexism
                  It's not sexism. And while it comes down to money, it's not what you think. There is a very good reason why mls academies fully fund their programs:

                  https://www.si.com/.amp/soccer/2019/...ity-fifa-rules

                  Also, LA Galaxy use to fund its women's program. But that ended in 2020. The thorns have no incentive or reason to fully fund their academy. It's a business, why would they?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Guest View Post

                    It's not sexism. And while it comes down to money, it's not what you think. There is a very good reason why mls academies fully fund their programs:

                    https://www.si.com/.amp/soccer/2019/...ity-fifa-rules

                    Also, LA Galaxy use to fund its women's program. But that ended in 2020. The thorns have no incentive or reason to fully fund their academy. It's a business, why would they?
                    “Random white guy uses the blanket term ‘business’ to absolve a richer white guy, who doesn’t know he exists, of any accountability. More at 11”. Stop bootlicking.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Guest View Post

                      “Random white guy uses the blanket term ‘business’ to absolve a richer white guy, who doesn’t know he exists, of any accountability. More at 11”. Stop bootlicking.
                      You are ignorant, but keep believing your own bs. Instead of explaining why anyone should fully find the thorns you resort to name calling. Keep it classy.

                      Those dollars would be better spent dealing with homelessness than providing charity to soccer players.

                      #WOKE

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Guest View Post

                        You are ignorant, but keep believing your own bs. Instead of explaining why anyone should fully find the thorns you resort to name calling. Keep it classy.

                        Those dollars would be better spent dealing with homelessness than providing charity to soccer players.

                        #WOKE
                        Who name called? Sorry if I’m annoying, but I just can’t find where anyone called anyone else names?

                        Just say you’re a sexist next time. It would be a lot easier and it would take less words.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Guest View Post
                          I have a question:
                          Why is soccer free for the boys in the Timbers Academy, and I have to pay for my daughter in the Thorns academy?
                          The Thorns Academy should have to pay their players for the amount of abuse they inflict on these poor kids.

                          Do your homework. That place is a disaster. Not a good environment for young female athletes

                          Comment


                            #14
                            The Thorns have no hold on ECNL program players, so it is not an Academy of the Thorns. What about Eastside Thorns? Boise Thorns, California Thorns? The people who play into this nonsense have no sense of reality. It's a shame that even the best people look the other way to give their little princess a leg up. Terrible parenting!

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Guest View Post

                              Who name called? Sorry if I’m annoying, but I just can’t find where anyone called anyone else names?

                              Just say you’re a sexist next time. It would be a lot easier and it would take less words.
                              I'm not a white guy nor a bootlicker. And now you are saying I'm sexist

                              stay classy

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X