GU13 NWCL Predictions

[Unregistered]

This guy clearly trying to diminish the accomplishments of a team that exceeded his dd s team.

My question is that if you don't think the timbers had a tough schedule.

Who had a tougher schedule??

He won't answer.

Further more. Find me one person who takes vancouvers schedule over wpfc. Pretty clear that opl went 2-14 against the same Rcl teams so why would you think playing FC thusc Eugene would be tougher?

The facts really don't support his thought. Really seems to have alter motives. You would have to , if you are willing to make yourself sound so dumb contrary to the facts.

Valencia parent i bet. Kid is left out so he can't take his ball and leave.

This all started when somebody claimed that WPFC had a "cakewalk" to the semi-finals compared to the Timbers.

I pointed out that:

1. The Timbers played 2 of the 3 softest teams in the tournament (Nova and Tynecastle)
2. Beating Rush and Crossfire B is comparable to beating top Oregon teams.
3. NWN clearly had a down weekend when they played the Timbers. They were actually EASIER to beat last weekend than the top Oregon teams, given that Lake Oswego beat them 2-0.
4. Which leaves Crossfire A, and I acknowledged that was a good win.

I did not start this argument. The person who claimed WPFC had a "cakewalk" did. I did not say WPFC had a tougher schedule. I simply said it was comparable. And if NWN had been their normal selves last weekend, I would have acknowledged that the Timbers had the more difficult schedule. Given NWN's performance last weekend, the schedules were pretty comparable.

[Unregistered]

Incorrect.


You lose 6-0 against a team that everyone is calling even with Eugene....that is saying something. They don't even beat RCL 2 teams by that much. And if you are a FC parent, you would assume after the VT game in June, they would be steam rolled now. It wasn't as close as the score put out. Any FC parent will tell you that.

A lot has happened since June including the actual summer and half of fall.

I'm sure you would think since FC lost to Crossfire 1-0 in June that it is exactly the measure now as you used Eugene.

That is a poor example.

Okay, if you just want to do recent results.

WSA Rush tied Eastside---- Eugene beat Wa Rush ---- Eugene is better than Eastside.
LO beats NWN 2-0 ---- NWN beats VTimbers twice in RCL --- LO is better than VTimbers.

You see how taking results of certain games and drawing decisive conclusions is STUPID! So FC had a terrible game that was totally out of character from who they have been in the last two years. Quit drawing conclusions from that one game! It's stupid and annoying! And you sir, have very serious self esteem issues. Learn to like yourself and you won't be so annoying online.

[Unregistered]

Okay, if you just want to do recent results.

WSA Rush tied Eastside---- Eugene beat Wa Rush ---- Eugene is better than Eastside.
LO beats NWN 2-0 ---- NWN beats VTimbers twice in RCL --- LO is better than VTimbers.

You see how taking results of certain games and drawing decisive conclusions is STUPID! So FC had a terrible game that was totally out of character from who they have been in the last two years. Quit drawing conclusions from that one game! It's stupid and annoying! And you sir, have very serious self esteem issues. Learn to like yourself and you won't be so annoying online.

Congrats!!! You dumbass morons have been arguing about some stupid nonsense for a week straight. LOOOSSSSSEEERRRRRSSSS!!! Nobody will even remember this crap in a few weeks.

[Unregistered]

This all started when somebody claimed that WPFC had a "cakewalk" to the semi-finals compared to the Timbers.

I pointed out that:

1. The Timbers played 2 of the 3 softest teams in the tournament (Nova and Tynecastle)
2. Beating Rush and Crossfire B is comparable to beating top Oregon teams.
3. NWN clearly had a down weekend when they played the Timbers. They were actually EASIER to beat last weekend than the top Oregon teams, given that Lake Oswego beat them 2-0.
4. Which leaves Crossfire A, and I acknowledged that was a good win.

I did not start this argument. The person who claimed WPFC had a "cakewalk" did. I did not say WPFC had a tougher schedule. I simply said it was comparable. And if NWN had been their normal selves last weekend, I would have acknowledged that the Timbers had the more difficult schedule. Given NWN's performance last weekend, the schedules were pretty comparable.

I agree with your assessment and opinions. I consider some here very ignorant and hostile for calling you a stupid moron, who's daughter is probably benched (on a team that sucks) and that you probably stand alone at games. lol It's too bad they don't realize their hostility discredits them and makes them look a little less intelligent than those who spell it out calmly, without personal attacks, like you do.

I appreciate your posts.

[Unregistered]

Congrats!!! You dumbass morons have been arguing about some stupid nonsense for a week straight. LOOOSSSSSEEERRRRRSSSS!!! Nobody will even remember this crap in a few weeks.

And nobody will remember your post more than 5 secon...wait, what post?

[Unregistered]

I agree with your assessment and opinions. I consider some here very ignorant and hostile for calling you a stupid moron, who's daughter is probably benched (on a team that sucks) and that you probably stand alone at games. lol It's too bad they don't realize their hostility discredits them and makes them look a little less intelligent than those who spell it out calmly, without personal attacks, like you do.

I appreciate your posts.

You can't respond to your own posts.

[Unregistered]

Okay, if you just want to do recent results.

WSA Rush tied Eastside---- Eugene beat Wa Rush ---- Eugene is better than Eastside.
LO beats NWN 2-0 ---- NWN beats VTimbers twice in RCL --- LO is better than VTimbers.

You see how taking results of certain games and drawing decisive conclusions is STUPID! So FC had a terrible game that was totally out of character from who they have been in the last two years. Quit drawing conclusions from that one game! It's stupid and annoying! And you sir, have very serious self esteem issues. Learn to like yourself and you won't be so annoying online.

You mad?


SOOOOOOOOOO out of character. They had a.....let me guess..........DOWN WEEKEND?!

You OPL defender crazies make me laugh!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

This is getting fun!

Eugene lost to WA Rush. They are 1-1. Puts them even. Timbers beat Rush without 3 starters and haven't lost to them in like 5 games.

LO lost to Timbers at their own tournament 2-0.

Don't worry! You win!

If an OPL team gets their butts kicked as they did all NWCL, its because its uncharacteristic.

If an OPL team beats an RCL team, its because the RCL team had a down weekend......

You are talking yourself in circles.

How much time do you spend looking looking up scores and when the scores don't help you say its uncharacteristic or down weekend.

[Unregistered]

You can't respond to your own posts.

Is that all you've got? You accuse the intelligent poster of having a loser, benched daughter, on a loser team, who also sits alone at games (maybe you are describing yourself)...and all you've got for me is that I'm posting as the other intelligent poster?! lol I'm not the *intelligent* poster making you look like a complete ignorant, inadequate a**...but if you consider me to be in that person's class, I'll take it!! What a compliment. Thank you!! Maybe I should post more often!

[Unregistered]

You mad?


SOOOOOOOOOO out of character. They had a.....let me guess..........DOWN WEEKEND?!

You OPL defender crazies make me laugh!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

This is getting fun!

Eugene lost to WA Rush. They are 1-1. Puts them even. Timbers beat Rush without 3 starters and haven't lost to them in like 5 games.

LO lost to Timbers at their own tournament 2-0.

Don't worry! You win!

If an OPL team gets their butts kicked as they did all NWCL, its because its uncharacteristic.

If an OPL team beats an RCL team, its because the RCL team had a down weekend......

You are talking yourself in circles.

How much time do you spend looking looking up scores and when the scores don't help you say its uncharacteristic or down weekend.

I seriously hope you share these posts with other fellow soccer parents. If one of our parents posted that, I would honestly start poking around to see if you are okay. Obviously we aren't dealing with a full deck of cards here.

[Unregistered]

I pointed out that:

1. The Timbers played 2 of the 3 softest teams in the tournament (Nova and Tynecastle)

Softest teams? FCSC lost to Tyncastle and your lone OPL semi finalist beat nova 1-0. Don't sound soft to me. I'm sorry if Timbers roll 6+ goals on them but if your dd's team CANT...wouldn't call them soft.

2. Beating Rush and Crossfire B is comparable to beating top Oregon teams.

a) Incorrect in that Crossfire B destroyed Oregon's BEST team 6-0. They are B.E.T.T.E.R than Oregon's top team. (1 very potential loss there)

b) Rush beat Eugene (Summer), FC Portland (OREGON's BEST), THUSC. They are B.E.T.T.E.R than anything from Oregon as no OPL team has done that yet. (1 very potential loss there)

3. NWN clearly had a down weekend when they played the Timbers. They were actually EASIER to beat last weekend than the top Oregon teams, given that Lake Oswego beat them 2-0.

That arguement is a joke in so many ways. And I cannot even believe you are that out of touch to say that. Easier to beat? You have NO clue or zero ability to make that claim based on Lake O's win. They rolled through OPL's best the first weekend on TURF which that is all they train on up there. They go to 60 acres and play on a field that everyone could tell was about Cook Park status. Lake Oswego took it to them a put two goals in quick. I heard NWN thought they were going to blow them out and got a wake up call. Lake O matches up with RCL teams better than most as they are more athletic than FC or Eugene as a whole. Put that on field where NWN can't play = what you get.

As far as Timbers beating them.....Timbers have beaten them 3 out of the last 6 times they have played...it is anyone's bet who wins that game especially as NWCL games are completely different than league games. NWN are not the top team in WA and its not shocking to see the Timbers beat them when it actually matters.

(1 very potential loss there....depending on how bad you think Lake O and Timbers are)

4. Which leaves Crossfire A, and I acknowledged that was a good win.
Timbers beat them 3-0 in league right after that.....so you can either call that a down game for Crossfire or easy street because the score seemed to reflect that rather than the opponent.

(1 very potential loss there.....)

5. Issaquah: OPL top teams either tied them or squeaked out a 1 goal win......

(1 very potential tie or loss)



"I did not start this argument. The person who claimed WPFC had a "cakewalk" did. I did not say WPFC had a tougher schedule. I simply said it was comparable. And if NWN had been their normal selves last weekend, I would have acknowledged that the Timbers had the more difficult schedule. Given NWN's performance last weekend, the schedules were pretty comparable"

In comparison to the Timbers schedule, WPFC schedule was EASIER as the teams Timbers played were B.E.T.T.E.R. with or without NWN.

To you NWN normal selves idea.....the entire premise is being based off of Lake Oswego winning because you are clearly not knowledgeable to make the assumption that if the Timbers beat them they had an off weekend....you must not know anything about the RCL teams. So instead of going off of actual components that go into a game or simply actually knowing how good teams are. You say they had an off weekend. Such a poor arguement. It's like me saying you DD's team beats the Timbers, the Timbers must of had a off weekend.....bad example because noone besides THUSC has beaten the Timbers....so saying if your DD's team beats Eugene, Eugene had an off weekend because in the same weekend they also lost to FC Portland.

WPFC had a tougher schedule than FCSC. But didn't have a tougher schedule than THUSC who played a mirror schedule almost to Timbers.

If the teams that Timbers played are B.E.T.T.E.R than they had a tougher schedule. Find me someone who had a tougher schedule than those two.

So 5 potential losses in a tournament where 1-2 makes all the difference shown by OPL teams....who went 2-14-1 against RCL, that alone shows that if you were to choose a schedule...

Would you choose to face the top 4 of Oregon or RCL????????

[Unregistered]

I seriously hope you share these posts with other fellow soccer parents. If one of our parents posted that, I would honestly start poking around to see if you are okay. Obviously we aren't dealing with a full deck of cards here.

FYI you posting that and probably previous posts in this stupid back and forth makes you 1 chromoso......i mean Ace missing in the deck.

[Unregistered]

Is that all you've got? You accuse the intelligent poster of having a loser, benched daughter, on a loser team, who also sits alone at games (maybe you are describing yourself)...and all you've got for me is that I'm posting as the other intelligent poster?! lol I'm not the *intelligent* poster making you look like a complete ignorant, inadequate a**...but if you consider me to be in that person's class, I'll take it!! What a compliment. Thank you!! Maybe I should post more often!

HA! We already consider you in that person's class. Unfortunately so does everyone else on your team...........

Daughter says to you after the game, "Why are you shouting so much during the game Dad?" "Its not classy at all and I don't know why you get so mad".

Sound familiar?


Class, Class, Class. :) :) :) :)

[Unregistered]

I pointed out that:

1. The Timbers played 2 of the 3 softest teams in the tournament (Nova and Tynecastle)

Softest teams? FCSC lost to Tyncastle and your lone OPL semi finalist beat nova 1-0. Don't sound soft to me. I'm sorry if Timbers roll 6+ goals on them but if your dd's team CANT...wouldn't call them soft.

2. Beating Rush and Crossfire B is comparable to beating top Oregon teams.

a) Incorrect in that Crossfire B destroyed Oregon's BEST team 6-0. They are B.E.T.T.E.R than Oregon's top team. (1 very potential loss there)

b) Rush beat Eugene (Summer), FC Portland (OREGON's BEST), THUSC. They are B.E.T.T.E.R than anything from Oregon as no OPL team has done that yet. (1 very potential loss there)

3. NWN clearly had a down weekend when they played the Timbers. They were actually EASIER to beat last weekend than the top Oregon teams, given that Lake Oswego beat them 2-0.

That arguement is a joke in so many ways. And I cannot even believe you are that out of touch to say that. Easier to beat? You have NO clue or zero ability to make that claim based on Lake O's win. They rolled through OPL's best the first weekend on TURF which that is all they train on up there. They go to 60 acres and play on a field that everyone could tell was about Cook Park status. Lake Oswego took it to them a put two goals in quick. I heard NWN thought they were going to blow them out and got a wake up call. Lake O matches up with RCL teams better than most as they are more athletic than FC or Eugene as a whole. Put that on field where NWN can't play = what you get.

As far as Timbers beating them.....Timbers have beaten them 3 out of the last 6 times they have played...it is anyone's bet who wins that game especially as NWCL games are completely different than league games. NWN are not the top team in WA and its not shocking to see the Timbers beat them when it actually matters.

(1 very potential loss there....depending on how bad you think Lake O and Timbers are)

4. Which leaves Crossfire A, and I acknowledged that was a good win.
Timbers beat them 3-0 in league right after that.....so you can either call that a down game for Crossfire or easy street because the score seemed to reflect that rather than the opponent.

(1 very potential loss there.....)

5. Issaquah: OPL top teams either tied them or squeaked out a 1 goal win......

(1 very potential tie or loss)



"I did not start this argument. The person who claimed WPFC had a "cakewalk" did. I did not say WPFC had a tougher schedule. I simply said it was comparable. And if NWN had been their normal selves last weekend, I would have acknowledged that the Timbers had the more difficult schedule. Given NWN's performance last weekend, the schedules were pretty comparable"

In comparison to the Timbers schedule, WPFC schedule was EASIER as the teams Timbers played were B.E.T.T.E.R. with or without NWN.

To you NWN normal selves idea.....the entire premise is being based off of Lake Oswego winning because you are clearly not knowledgeable to make the assumption that if the Timbers beat them they had an off weekend....you must not know anything about the RCL teams. So instead of going off of actual components that go into a game or simply actually knowing how good teams are. You say they had an off weekend. Such a poor arguement. It's like me saying you DD's team beats the Timbers, the Timbers must of had a off weekend.....bad example because noone besides THUSC has beaten the Timbers....so saying if your DD's team beats Eugene, Eugene had an off weekend because in the same weekend they also lost to FC Portland.

WPFC had a tougher schedule than FCSC. But didn't have a tougher schedule than THUSC who played a mirror schedule almost to Timbers.

If the teams that Timbers played are B.E.T.T.E.R than they had a tougher schedule. Find me someone who had a tougher schedule than those two.

So 5 potential losses in a tournament where 1-2 makes all the difference shown by OPL teams....who went 2-14-1 against RCL, that alone shows that if you were to choose a schedule...

Would you choose to face the top 4 of Oregon or RCL????????

So OPL advocates can't use Regionals because "so much has happened since then", but you have no problem using Rush's win over Eugene in Regionals, ignoring Eugene's win against Rush last week, to prove your point that Rush is better than Eugene?

[Unregistered]

FYI you posting that and probably previous posts in this stupid back and forth makes you 1 chromoso......i mean Ace missing in the deck.

sometimes it takes an ace to prove a point. the dude/dudette is missing a link. he/she is not well.

[Unregistered]

So OPL advocates can't use Regionals because "so much has happened since then", but you have no problem using Rush's win over Eugene in Regionals, ignoring Eugene's win against Rush last week, to prove your point that Rush is better than Eugene?

Count regionals or not.......doesn't help the OPL's case at all in that FC Portland and THUSC were awful. Lake Oswego and Eugene had a weaker schedule than anyone except for FCSC..

Discounting Rush as tougher opponent than OPL top teams doesn't support the facts in that they are CLEARLY better than any of the OPL top teams in that they have beaten them all which none of the OPL teams are capable of.