Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ideal Organizational Structure

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ideal Organizational Structure

    I have been thinking about the OPL/OYSA split and trying to figure out what the "Ideal structure: would look like and welcome additions and or deletions to the following.

    First OPL would take over control of completive soccer with the following improvements to their organizational structure:
    1. They would hire a professional executive to run and coordinate the activities of Premier soccer in OR and SW Washington. They would also hire professional unaffiliated staff to run the day to day operations including scheduling.

    2. The Board would be comprised of 9 members of which only 4 could be DOC's. Four would be comprised of selected/elected representatives of the member clubs with the provision that they could not come from the same club as a DOC on the Board. The final member would HAVE to be a member of the community unaffiliated with any soccer related entity or sponsor. The board would elect the president from the nine.

    The ability divisions would remain the same however there would be a Northern Division and a Southern division with a few South Portland area clubs in the Southern division which would include Eugene, and the Medford/Roseburg clubs, however these extreme Southern clubs would be expected to play a majority of their "home" games in Eugene.

    At the end of each season a league champion would be declared and get a first round bye in a true State Cup. The State Cup fee would include enough money to pay the winners entry fee for regionals AND cover the costs of one coach including transportation and lodging.

    In an effort to encourage consolidation at the High School level teams that did not finish in the top four of the U14 Spring league would be sent down or forced to merge for the following Spring season. OSSA's experiment clearly shows the benefits of this approach. (Hello THUSC, WSM, BSC & FC)

    On the girls side until an area club was awarded an ENCL membership all female players U11 and above would be assessed $10 to go to fund ODP participation so that all worthy players tried out and could afford making the team!

    A smaller fee would be assessed for the boys to help off set the cost of DA participation.

    Please add your ideas to this frame work and when we are done I and a few other concerned parents will take the result to the respective organizations and ask them how they can make it happen.

    #2
    What if ECNL never comes to OR? Why should girls fund ODP?

    Comment


      #3
      1st 4 paragraphs make perfect sense, the last 4 paragraphs I disagree

      Comment


        #4
        Next best exposure/competition outside ENCL

        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        What if ECNL never comes to OR? Why should girls fund ODP?
        Because that is the closest thing to ENCL level exposure/competition we are going to have for the majority of players!

        Comment


          #5
          Don't just disagree propose solution!

          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          1st 4 paragraphs make perfect sense, the last 4 paragraphs I disagree
          Remember what your mom said about criticism. If you don't have anything positive to say ....

          Well let's hear your solution.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Remember what your mom said about criticism. If you don't have anything positive to say ....

            Well let's hear your solution.
            Okay. Keep paragraphs 1-4 and strikeout/remove the last 4 paragraphs

            Comment


              #7
              spreading cost a huge plus

              While some posters might object to player fees going to support ODP we have to keep in mind that we are talking chump change. What's $10 for an ENTIRE year but the cost of two Starbucks drinks!

              In addition to spreading the cost of the upper end participation to make it affordable to all who qualify we need to consider raising money to improve the maintenance of our fields and possibly some day owning our own fields. Asking every parent to kick in another $20 each year so that we can improve the facilities we use so heavily is not a burden but a benefit to all players and families.

              Comment


                #8
                Don't forget about the Officials

                Since we are talking about an ideal set up I have to advocate for improving how we pay and train our officials. Long time readers will recognize me and or my position but for the newbies it all boils down to we get what we pay for.

                For as little as $30 from each player for an entire year we can put $38 more on the field for every game which allows us to pay the AR's more than minimum wage and subsequently we get to demand that they know the off sides rule and hustle enough to be in position to call it.

                It also allows us to pay the Referee enough to keep up with the game and be in good enough shape to finish a game running. It also allows us consumers to demand that they meet regularly to improve their skills and AT THE SAME TIME mentor the younger referees.

                So if we add up the cost of the ODP fee, the field maintenance fee and the Officials Assessment we are only looking at $60 for an entire year! Whats that work out to $3.0 a game. I guess you'll just have to have a Pikes vs. mocha late with a double shot each week.
                Last edited by rvrctyrdnck; 05-08-2012, 10:19 PM.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Why

                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Okay. Keep paragraphs 1-4 and strikeout/remove the last 4 paragraphs
                  Can you explain your objections?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by rvrctyrdnck View Post
                    Since we are talking about an ideal set up I have to advocate for improving how we pay and train our officials. Long time readers will recognize me and or my position but for the newbies it all boils down to we get what we pay for.

                    For as little as $30 from each player for an entire year we can put $38 more on the field for every game which allows us to pay the AR's more than minimum wage and subsequently we get to demand that they know the off sides rule and hustle enough to be in position to call it.

                    It also allows us to pay the Referee enough to keep up with the game and be in good enough shape to finish a game running. It also allows us consumers to demand that they meet regularly to improve their skills and AT THE SAME TIME mentor the younger referees.

                    So if we add up the cost of the ODP fee, the field maintenance fee and the Officials Assessment we are only looking at $60 for an entire year! Whats that work out to $3.0 a game. I guess you'll just have to have a Pikes vs. mocha late with a double shot each week.
                    I would be in much more suppor of paying additional fees that went to improving our officials and education then funding ODP. If ODP is going to be pay to play; I should not have to pay and NOT play.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I don't think you understand

                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      I would be in much more support of paying additional fees that went to improving our officials and education then funding ODP. If ODP is going to be pay to play; I should not have to pay and NOT play.
                      The reason that we are talking a small fee is so that the players don't have to pay to play on the ODP teams. In the "old" days OYSA too $3 from every player to fund ODP and it still cost about $450 plus travel. At $10 I was hoping to zero out the fee so that the only cost to participate was the travel!

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        I would be in much more suppor of paying additional fees that went to improving our officials and education then funding ODP. If ODP is going to be pay to play; I should not have to pay and NOT play.
                        I guess it comes down to this; if your kid isn't good enough to play ODP why should you pay an additional fee. Well, maybe to give your kid something to shoot for, or, to give someone a chance that is good enough but can't afford it. Both are good for Oregon soccer. If you're not willing to support it, don't play in Oregon.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          I would be in much more suppor of paying additional fees that went to improving our officials and education then funding ODP. If ODP is going to be pay to play; I should not have to pay and NOT play.
                          That's right !!!! It's all about me and my kid. I know she's not good enough to make an ODP team today so I don't wanna pay for some other kid too either

                          Comment

                          Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                          Auto-Saved
                          x
                          Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                          x
                          Working...
                          X