With tryouts coming up I have been thinking about what the recruiting ban for coaches & clubs actually does for the players themselves.
IMHO it hurts the players as it allows sub par clubs and coaches to lock up players who would benefit from moving to better situations. It also allows too many clubs to exist which dilutes the teams and hurts players at all levels.
IMHO the ban is in place to protect the clubs and coaches from having to actually compete for players because a majority of kids who stick with the game get stuck with their initial clubs/teams through U14.
Add on top of this ban the fact that the tryout schedule makes it very difficult to try out for more than one team and you have a system designed to prevent open competition between clubs and coaches.
In conversations with So Cal parents they say that their parents play an active role in recruiting players for the more competitive teams and work hard to make player introductions to the coaches so that the coach can say "the player can to me, I didn't go to them".
I think it's silly that we ask our kids to be competitive on the pitch yet we allow them to exist in a club environment that is anti-competitive. Nothing typifies this anti competitive spirit than the Gaff rule that prevents coaches from coaching their teams at different clubs even if they get fired from that previous club.
Some body needs to explain to me the benefits of the system as it exists now.
IMHO it hurts the players as it allows sub par clubs and coaches to lock up players who would benefit from moving to better situations. It also allows too many clubs to exist which dilutes the teams and hurts players at all levels.
IMHO the ban is in place to protect the clubs and coaches from having to actually compete for players because a majority of kids who stick with the game get stuck with their initial clubs/teams through U14.
Add on top of this ban the fact that the tryout schedule makes it very difficult to try out for more than one team and you have a system designed to prevent open competition between clubs and coaches.
In conversations with So Cal parents they say that their parents play an active role in recruiting players for the more competitive teams and work hard to make player introductions to the coaches so that the coach can say "the player can to me, I didn't go to them".
I think it's silly that we ask our kids to be competitive on the pitch yet we allow them to exist in a club environment that is anti-competitive. Nothing typifies this anti competitive spirit than the Gaff rule that prevents coaches from coaching their teams at different clubs even if they get fired from that previous club.
Some body needs to explain to me the benefits of the system as it exists now.
Comment