Not a fair comparison. That is an extremely weak age group and that's been known for sometime. There's nothing shocking about it. Oregon does very well at all the other age groups for both boys and girls.
I guess I am not understanding either comment. Are you saying that Washington is bad or Oregon is bad or what sort of general comparison are you trying to make? Some years are better than others and it happens everywhere.
The NWCL in my opinion doesn't demonstrate anything. What drives people to say such broad negative things? I know it does not come from the parents of kids who are doing extremely well. It seems like it is an affirmation to those whose children can't make the A team or the starting roster. Then they can look at those who did and cut them down.
I guess I am not understanding either comment. Are you saying that Washington is bad or Oregon is bad or what sort of general comparison are you trying to make? Some years are better than others and it happens everywhere.
The NWCL in my opinion doesn't demonstrate anything. What drives people to say such broad negative things? I know it does not come from the parents of kids who are doing extremely well. It seems like it is an affirmation to those whose children can't make the A team or the starting roster. Then they can look at those who did and cut them down.
Comment