These are posts imported from another thread that I (and others) felt deserved its own thread.
Personally, I agree. I believe OSSA is on the right track when they brought in Southside. I also think the Tualatin/Sherwood deal is a good thing. If we combined the clubs geographically we could form 4 or 5 major clubs to service Oregon. Granted, the highest populous is in the pdx metro so accommodations would need to be made. It would create great competitive teams at nearly every age group, bolster both the girls and boys side of the clubs and it would make ODP/id2/DA selection easier because you wouldn't have 100 clubs sending players. I really like the point that the coaches compete to move up in the ranks. It's what we do on the team, the player who works the hardest and has the best results starts. When you travel within the state you could lump it together so every club would get their opportunity to 'host' a weekend. Give the clubs an option to play OYSA or OPL. NWCL, FWRL or ECNL. All clubs would play in a 'State Sponsored' round robin tournament to see who would represent Oregon at Regional or National Tournaments.
I realize this is far fetched and off-the-cuff but I believe something needs to be done. It's too scattered and diluted IMHO. My 2 cents worth.
Anyone have any thoughts they want to add? Maybe a better breakdown than geographically? How would you divide or merge the clubs if you were given full access to do so? Thanks.
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I said it earlier, too many clubs. The resources are spread too thinly. Also, many soccer clubs charge $2,500 + per year in fees. If you look at the ECNL clubs, they have coaches who coach full time, they don't have outside jobs. It's a competition between coaches to move up the ranks. They begin recruiting players and forming teams at the U6-U8 level that they then stay with till U-14 or even beyond.
I'm not rooting against ECNL, I'm just saying that they need to fix the club system here first for ECNL to be successful. Get rid of the po-dunk clubs that serve small, local geographies. You see, each club then feels that they have to have a DOC, which dilutes resources, along with paying for playing fields, which dilutes resources. If you add up all of the little soccer clubs here in Portland, I suspect that you will have more clubs than there are in Seattle, Denver, Dallas, ....Certainly we have fewer major clubs than they have.
I said it earlier, too many clubs. The resources are spread too thinly. Also, many soccer clubs charge $2,500 + per year in fees. If you look at the ECNL clubs, they have coaches who coach full time, they don't have outside jobs. It's a competition between coaches to move up the ranks. They begin recruiting players and forming teams at the U6-U8 level that they then stay with till U-14 or even beyond.
I'm not rooting against ECNL, I'm just saying that they need to fix the club system here first for ECNL to be successful. Get rid of the po-dunk clubs that serve small, local geographies. You see, each club then feels that they have to have a DOC, which dilutes resources, along with paying for playing fields, which dilutes resources. If you add up all of the little soccer clubs here in Portland, I suspect that you will have more clubs than there are in Seattle, Denver, Dallas, ....Certainly we have fewer major clubs than they have.
I realize this is far fetched and off-the-cuff but I believe something needs to be done. It's too scattered and diluted IMHO. My 2 cents worth.
Anyone have any thoughts they want to add? Maybe a better breakdown than geographically? How would you divide or merge the clubs if you were given full access to do so? Thanks.
Comment