Financial leverage as kompromat

[Unregistered]

You truly are a Sage 4 Clinger! Your defense is based on these words: concerns, anecdotal, visceral reaction, pause, potential, concerning. What do they all have in common? They are all opinions. Again, where is the proof of any collusion. You can't answer that because there is none. Although all the above mentioned had opinions, when specifically asked if they knew of or had in their possession proof of collusion, they all testified under oath no. They never had it or saw it. Like you, they desperately wanted to find it but couldn't.

So what have we learned from this? You don't care about our constitution and the rule of law. You are willing to ruin lives and undo the will of the American voter because of visceral reactions and anecdotal pauses. You would rather ignore the facts of the principal players involved in the case and cling to the scholars at Vanity Fair and Mother Jones. How's that working out for ya? Just wondering, cause for some strange reason Trump is still your President. You were saying something about credibility? ;)

Nice try, but face it, you got busted. You lied when you said all those officials denied the possibility of Russian collusion.

Now let's hear your innocent explanation for those 57 pieces of evidence. Start with Helsinki, please.

[Unregistered]

Nice try, but face it, you got busted. You lied when you said all those officials denied the possibility of Russian collusion.

Now let's hear your innocent explanation for those 57 pieces of evidence. Start with Helsinki, please.

Careful, you're having a visceral reaction. Who's lying here? Where did I say those officials denied the possibility of collusion? I said they all testified under oath there was no evidence of collusion. Once again, you're proven wrong. Tell me something, do you think Clapper, McCabe, Yates, *****, Rhodes, and Powers are familiar with your 57 pieces of evidence? I imagine being the premier law enforcement/intelligence agents in this country that they probably are. So that begs the question if they were privy to the 57 pieces of your said evidence, why did they testify to no evidence of collusion? Certainly out of the 50+ intelligence agents who testified under oath, somebody would have brought up circumstantial evidence. But guess what, they didn't. Not a single solitary person testified to your circumstantial evidence theory.

Maybe you know more than our own government but I assure you things such as concerns, gut feelings, pauses, and anecdotes aren't evidence. That's why I quoted just the facts because at the end of the day it doesn't matter what they think or feel, it's what they can prove. Libtards like you concentrate on the former and completely ignore the latter. Unfortunately for you, they simply couldn't prove any collusion which is why Trump is still your president. Just like the Mueller investigation, it's over for you. You cannot prove collusion anymore than Clapper can and that's a big problem for your narrative. It's time to bring in your relief pitcher cause I've been lighting you up all day. :)

[Unregistered]

It's obvious to anyone reading this that your entire argument hangs on a technicality - that no smoking gun evidence of conspiracy has been revealed yet. Trump has been particularly careful to cover his tracks. But that doesn't mean it didn't happen. The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. The fact that you can't explain it away speaks volumes.

So stop dodging it. Let's hear your theory on trump's odd affinity for Russia and his tendency to do things that benefit Russia and not the United States. Start with Helsinki, please.

Wow! There’s some strong “circumstantial evidence” here. That means Obama is guilty!

https://www.theblaze.com/news/michae...-in-flynn-case

“Michael Flynn's lead attorney, Sidney Powell, claimed on Fox News Sunday that former President Barack Obama was involved in the plot by the Justice Department and FBI to frame Flynn.”

“Recently released documents reveal that Obama knew about Flynn's conversations with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak before the FBI interviewed Flynn.”

"The whole thing was orchestrated and set up within the FBI, Clapper, Brennan, and in the Oval Office meeting that day with President Obama," Powell said.

[Unregistered]

Let's put all those quotes in context, and restore the parts you cut out, shall we?

[...]

All these people had serious concerns about the disturbing connections between trump and Russia.

So what have we learned from this? That you won't hesitate to cherry-pick quotes, quote out of context, and delete the parts that contradict your narrative. Such dishonesty and intentional deception. Both your argument and your credibility have been destroyed. How can we ever trust anything you say again?

Clearly our resident trumptard isn't just innocently misinformed, he has a deliberate agenda to lie, twist, and deceive. I'm not sure whose interests that serves. The Russians, maybe.

Everyone who testified at that 2017 Intelligence committee hearing stated that while there was no direct evidence of conspiracy, the numerous trump-Russia connections were very alarming. Quoting the former without acknowledging the latter would be journalistic malpractice if done in the mainstream media, but our Russian Troll does it shamelessly here. Unfortunately for him, everybody sees through it.

He will never come up with an innocent explanation for those 57 pieces of circumstantial evidence or trump's comments in Helsinki. Because there is no explanation other than trump is compromised by the Russians. Hillary tried to tell us in 2016, but people voted for trump anyway. They won't be so naive in November.

[Unregistered]

Imagine if you will, a U.S. president who:

1. Borrows billions of dollars from foreign oligarchs to fund his real estate deals, because U.S. lenders are no longer willing to loan him money
2. Sees the value of those real estate holdings decline in value, to the point where they are worth less than the outstanding loans
3. Knows the oligarchs have the power to call those loans at any time, which would force him into a very public and very embarrassing bankruptcy

How might that president behave towards those oligarchs?

You people are beyond desperate.

Even your own liberal outlets do not stand by this fake news propaganda. LMFAO.

MSNBC's O'Donnell said he 'shouldn't have reported' his on-air claim that Trump has loans with Deutsche Bank backed by 'Russian billionaires close to Vladimir Putin'
https://www.businessinsider.com/msnb...ussians-2019-8

Some of the Trump Tower buyers were Russian Billionaires, but some of them were Democrats too, does that make him a Libtard?

[Unregistered]

Clearly our resident trumptard isn't just innocently misinformed, he has a deliberate agenda to lie, twist, and deceive. I'm not sure whose interests that serves. The Russians, maybe.

Everyone who testified at that 2017 Intelligence committee hearing stated that while there was no direct evidence of conspiracy, the numerous trump-Russia connections were very alarming. Quoting the former without acknowledging the latter would be journalistic malpractice if done in the mainstream media, but our Russian Troll does it shamelessly here. Unfortunately for him, everybody sees through it.

He will never come up with an innocent explanation for those 57 pieces of circumstantial evidence or trump's comments in Helsinki. Because there is no explanation other than trump is compromised by the Russians. Hillary tried to tell us in 2016, but people voted for trump anyway. They won't be so naive in November.

If SCOTUS decides to uphold the constitution, we will soon see trump's tax returns and financial statements. And then we will finally have the smoking gun evidence the trumptards are screaming about.

Meanwhile, for the disbelievers, there's this:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/21...umps-business/

And this:
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/33...the-funding-we

And this:
https://www.businessinsider.com/dona...-russia-2018-2

And this:
https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...ing-the-money/

And those other 57 examples of questionable trump-Russia connections where the only possible explanation is that trump is owned by Putin.

[Unregistered]

If SCOTUS decides to uphold the constitution, we will soon see trump's tax returns and financial statements. And then we will finally have the smoking gun evidence the trumptards are screaming about.

Meanwhile, for the disbelievers, there's this:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/21...umps-business/

And this:
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/33...the-funding-we

And this:
https://www.businessinsider.com/dona...-russia-2018-2

And this:
https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...ing-the-money/

And those other 57 examples of questionable trump-Russia connections where the only possible explanation is that trump is owned by Putin.

It that what it takes? 72 hours to get over that ass whoopin you took? Have you found the evidence yet? You know, the evidence Clapper, *****, Rice, Rhodes, and rest couldn’t. The world is counting on you!

[Unregistered]

It that what it takes? 72 hours to get over that ass whoopin you took? Have you found the evidence yet? You know, the evidence Clapper, *****, Rice, Rhodes, and rest couldn’t. The world is counting on you!

It was you who received the ass whoopin, when you got exposed for misrepresenting their testimony to conceal the fact that ALL those people had serious concerns about trump's disturbing connections to Russia.

[Unregistered]

It was you who received the ass whoopin, when you got exposed for misrepresenting their testimony to conceal the fact that ALL those people had serious concerns about trump's disturbing connections to Russia.

Hahaha, concerns aren’t evidence. Hence their no evidence testimony. Maybe you should google it. Just waiting on your evidence. Any idea when you will produce it? Since you’re the “serious concerns” expert, how bout the disturbing connections Biden has with China. Funny, I don’t hear a lot about that from you and the rest of the libtards. Unlike Russia, the China-Biden collusion might actually be based on facts. He’s already changing his story. Only time will tell.

[Unregistered]

Hahaha, concerns aren’t evidence. Hence their no evidence testimony. Maybe you should google it. Just waiting on your evidence. Any idea when you will produce it? Since you’re the “serious concerns” expert, how bout the disturbing connections Biden has with China. Funny, I don’t hear a lot about that from you and the rest of the libtards. Unlike Russia, the China-Biden collusion might actually be based on facts. He’s already changing his story. Only time will tell.

LOL. Let's see 57 pieces of evidence (circumstantial or otherwise) of China's connection to Joe Biden. Also please link me to where Biden sided with Xi Jinping over the U.S. Intelligence Community on any issue.

This is desperation at it's very finest. It's trump's rubber-glue whataboutism defense. It didn't work in 3rd grade and it won't work here. It's even less effective when the whatabout is a complete fabrication.

[Unregistered]

If SCOTUS decides to uphold the constitution, we will soon see trump's tax returns and financial statements. And then we will finally have the smoking gun evidence the trumptards are screaming about.

Meanwhile, for the disbelievers, there's this:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/21...umps-business/

And this:
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/33...the-funding-we

And this:
https://www.businessinsider.com/dona...-russia-2018-2

And this:
https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...ing-the-money/

And those other 57 examples of questionable trump-Russia connections where the only possible explanation is that trump is owned by Putin.

Haha, I bet Eric and Don Jr. got some serious punishment after blabbing about Russian money. Tends to undermine dad's "I have nothing to do with Russia" narrative.

trump seems ready to fight to the death over those financial records. Must be something really incriminating in there.

[Unregistered]

Haha, I bet Eric and Don Jr. got some serious punishment after blabbing about Russian money. Tends to undermine dad's "I have nothing to do with Russia" narrative.

trump seems ready to fight to the death over those financial records. Must be something really incriminating in there.

For the record, is this your smoking gun that is gonna take Trump down? This is your mountain of evidence? Wow, now I’m worried 😂😂😂

[Unregistered]

Imagine if you will, a U.S. president who:

1. Borrows billions of dollars from foreign oligarchs to fund his real estate deals, because U.S. lenders are no longer willing to loan him money
2. Sees the value of those real estate holdings decline in value, to the point where they are worth less than the outstanding loans
3. Knows the oligarchs have the power to call those loans at any time, which would force him into a very public and very embarrassing bankruptcy

How might that president behave towards those oligarchs?

He might cancel the Open Skies treaty, yet another unequivocal capitulation to Putin
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/24/opini...man/index.html
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidax.../#3b6ea35b72b8
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/21/o...ty-russia.html

[Unregistered]

Imagine if you will, a U.S. president who:

1. Borrows billions of dollars from foreign oligarchs to fund his real estate deals, because U.S. lenders are no longer willing to loan him money
2. Sees the value of those real estate holdings decline in value, to the point where they are worth less than the outstanding loans
3. Knows the oligarchs have the power to call those loans at any time, which would force him into a very public and very embarrassing bankruptcy

How might that president behave towards those oligarchs?

He might vow to invite Russia to the next G7 summit, ignoring the fact that they were kicked out in 2014 because of the annexation of Crimea, and that hasn't changed:
https://www.ft.com/content/be195fdb-...3-51fc5e94b31f
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ow-in-biarritz
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-g...-idUSKBN23700B

Trump apologists, please explain how this is good for America. It obviously benefits Putin.

[Unregistered]

Another favor for Daddy Vladdy

Imagine if you will, a U.S. president who:

1. Borrows billions of dollars from foreign oligarchs to fund his real estate deals, because U.S. lenders are no longer willing to loan him money
2. Sees the value of those real estate holdings decline in value, to the point where they are worth less than the outstanding loans
3. Knows the oligarchs have the power to call those loans at any time, which would force him into a very public and very embarrassing bankruptcy

How might that president behave towards those oligarchs?

He might order U.S. troops to withdraw from Germany, despite opposition from his own party:

"We believe that such steps would significantly damage U.S. national security as well as strengthen the position of Russia to our detriment," wrote the GOP lawmakers.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...germany-309622

"The redeployment gratifies Vladimir Putin, who since Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea has been slowly and not very stealthily dismembering Europe’s geographically largest nation: Ukraine. Putin, the other world figure who is a cauldron of resentments, has a special grievance against NATO for its role in the Soviet Union’s demise, which he considers “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.” He surely has enjoyed Trump’s denigration of NATO and would relish the alliance’s disintegration."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...bf9_story.html

Trump apologists, please explain how this is good for America.