Libs Cannot Outsmart Trump

[Unregistered]

You're not paying attention. HRC has nothing to do with the proven fact that the Russians are putting support behind TG's campaign. I'm just asking why Ms Gabbard doesn't acknowledge that proven fact and disavow their support. Why do you keep dodging that question?

Gee, where did I hear this before? You know it’s bad when the New York Times and WSJ are calling HRC an idiot.

“Call it Hillary Classic. Start with an outrageous charge, backed with zero evidence, against a combat veteran who still serves as a major in the Army National Guard. Use an interview about the 2020 election to try to settle an old score, in this case Ms. Gabbard’s 2016 resignation as vice chairman of the DNC and her endorsement of Bernie Sanders after she’d complained publicly the party was limiting debates, which was thought to favor Mrs. Clinton. Finally, yet again blame your loss to Mr. Trump on the Russians rather than accept that you were a lousy candidate.” - The Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/all...ts-11571696214

[Unregistered]

Dems have disavowed HRCs claims, yet at the same time the evidence is there that Russia is paying far more attention to her than is normal. Con has yet to address that fact. TG has yet to address that fact.

FB found more fake accounts claiming to have been started in swing states but were from Russia. Russia is only ramping up its efforts to create chaos for 2020.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/21/t...ssia-iran.html

[Unregistered]

The highly-trained Russian trolls are attacking Facebook and the other large platforms. Here on TS we are stuck with the semi-retarded flunkee ones.

^^^ This.

I think our resident Russian Troll must have flunked out of troll school early. Probably right after the lesson that said "Blame everything on Hillary". A tactic that's especially stupid in light of her recent exoneration and the fact that she no longer holds public office.

[Unregistered]

^^^ This.

I think our resident Russian Troll must have flunked out of troll school early. Probably right after the lesson that said "Blame everything on Hillary". A tactic that's especially stupid in light of her recent exoneration and the fact that she no longer holds public office.

...you have to feel pity for the Cons. After last week's worst every WH performance in US history .... they finally got their cherry on the cake --- Hillary completely and utterly exonerated of all the baseless charges .... Five years of republican lying, millions spent investigating leading to this...
Looking forward to the public testimonies in the I AM PEACHY inquiry that are coming up .... will give a wonderful view of republican oinkers feeding at their trough... and wallowing in the mud that is their historical legacy.... next stop the Pelosi wood shed...

[Unregistered]

Dems have disavowed HRCs claims, yet at the same time the evidence is there that Russia is paying far more attention to her than is normal. Con has yet to address that fact. TG has yet to address that fact.

FB found more fake accounts claiming to have been started in swing states but were from Russia. Russia is only ramping up its efforts to create chaos for 2020.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/21/t...ssia-iran.html

Well, it seems like you’re the only one who cares. Even your own party thinks Clinton is an idiot. Look like that sweet cool-aid has turned sour. Russia attacks. That’s what they do but a former 2 time losing presidential candidate and SOS is just sad. Just look at the liberal pushback. Everyone sees it except you. Хорошего дня 😂

[Unregistered]

...Hillary completely and utterly exonerated of all the baseless charges .... Five years of republican lying, millions spent investigating leading to this...

And the NYT saw fit to print the exoneration on page 16 after how many editions included stories about her emails on page 1?

I see Jeffrey Toobin is expressing regret and issuing apologies for mishandling the coverage of the non-scandal, but it's a little too late for that. Damage done...by a media these Cons keep claiming props up Democrats and trashes Republicans. Proof right there they can't effing read.

[Unregistered]

...you have to feel pity for the Cons. After last week's worst every WH performance in US history .... they finally got their cherry on the cake --- Hillary completely and utterly exonerated of all the baseless charges .... Five years of republican lying, millions spent investigating leading to this...
Looking forward to the public testimonies in the I AM PEACHY inquiry that are coming up .... will give a wonderful view of republican oinkers feeding at their trough... and wallowing in the mud that is their historical legacy.... next stop the Pelosi wood shed...

You have to feel bad for the HRC troglodytes. Her own party is shîtting all over her and they cant take it. They can longer defend her corrupt and bizarre conspiracy theories. So what do they do? Go right to the whataboutism playbook. But, but, but she was exonerated? Oh really? Wanna talk about that email victory? 😂. You dodged this topic last time. So out of the emails that HRC would allow congress to see 588 violation occurred with 91 of those having compromised classified information. Hmm, unfortunately they were unable to investigate the over 33,000 emails that were conveniently destroyed. Yes sir, we’ll deserved victory for sure. Here ya go Mr Investigators. Here are the emails my team has reviewed and are deemed safe for your investigation. Please review only these and tell us if we did anything wrong. Classic Clinton! Comgrats, you libtards celebrate corruption.

[Unregistered]

And the NYT saw fit to print the exoneration on page 16 after how many editions included stories about her emails on page 1?

I see Jeffrey Toobin is expressing regret and issuing apologies for mishandling the coverage of the non-scandal, but it's a little too late for that. Damage done...by a media these Cons keep claiming props up Democrats and trashes Republicans. Proof right there they can't effing read.

Is that the same NYT that just blasted HRC for being a fake conspiracy theorist and sore loser? That was a pretty good article.

[Unregistered]

Well, it seems like you’re the only one who cares. Even your own party thinks Clinton is an idiot. Look like that sweet cool-aid has turned sour. Russia attacks. That’s what they do but a former 2 time losing presidential candidate and SOS is just sad. Just look at the liberal pushback. Everyone sees it except you. Хорошего дня 😂

No, the Democratic party does not consider Clinton an idiot. If you want to uphold that claim, please link to the press release from the DNC stating as such.

Politically, HRC took one for the team, and it was brilliantly done. She's effectively neutralized TG from ever splitting off and running as a third-party independent with any integrity or credibility. And yes, there were rumblings that might happen.

She also raised the issue of Russian interference, which cannot be highlighted often enough.

Gabbard was one of the few representatives to vote against the Magnitsky Act and she hired Chris Cooper. If that name doesn't ring a bell, he's the guy who headed the campaign to smear Bill Browder and attempt to repeal the Magnitsky Act. Cooper was paid by Natalia Veselnitskaya whose name should ring a bell. The Magnitsky Act is a massive stick in Putin's craw. He desperately wants it repealed and here we have a member of congress appearing to support that effort.

Willing agent or unwitting asset, Gabbard is useful to the Russians and appears to be favoring their positions. There's just no other way to interpret these facts. She has adopted some very questionable stances that deserve serious scrutiny and answers.

[Unregistered]

Is that the same NYT that just blasted HRC for being a fake conspiracy theorist and sore loser? That was a pretty good article.

Whatever interpretation helps you sleep at night. Отвали, товарищ

[Unregistered]

The Dems have been burned by 3rd party candidates multiple times. Remember Ralph Nadar? I don't blame them for being skeptical

Republicans felt that sting in 1992 with Ross Perot. Unfortunately, with an entrenched two-party system, third party candidates are going to be nothing more than spoilers. We won't be forced to learn how to compromise and build coalitions across party lines in this country any time soon.

[Unregistered]

No, the Democratic party does not consider Clinton an idiot. If you want to uphold that claim, please link to the press release from the DNC stating as such.

Politically, HRC took one for the team, and it was brilliantly done. She's effectively neutralized TG from ever splitting off and running as a third-party independent with any integrity or credibility. And yes, there were rumblings that might happen.

She also raised the issue of Russian interference, which cannot be highlighted often enough.

Gabbard was one of the few representatives to vote against the Magnitsky Act and she hired Chris Cooper. If that name doesn't ring a bell, he's the guy who headed the campaign to smear Bill Browder and attempt to repeal the Magnitsky Act. Cooper was paid by Natalia Veselnitskaya whose name should ring a bell. The Magnitsky Act is a massive stick in Putin's craw. He desperately wants it repealed and here we have a member of congress appearing to support that effort.

Willing agent or unwitting asset, Gabbard is useful to the Russians and appears to be favoring their positions. There's just no other way to interpret these facts. She has adopted some very questionable stances that deserve serious scrutiny and answers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBcqd3cFRDU

[Unregistered]

Republicans felt that sting in 1992 with Ross Perot. Unfortunately, with an entrenched two-party system, third party candidates are going to be nothing more than spoilers. We won't be forced to learn how to compromise and build coalitions across party lines in this country any time soon.

Is Tulsi Gabbard running as a third party candidate?

[Unregistered]

Republicans felt that sting in 1992 with Ross Perot. Unfortunately, with an entrenched two-party system, third party candidates are going to be nothing more than spoilers. We won't be forced to learn how to compromise and build coalitions across party lines in this country any time soon.

It is a huge frustration with our election process that we basically are a two party system. We would be much better served with more parties (within a reasonable number). It forces compromises and alignments to get things done. More voters would feel like there are candidates for them instead of having to chose between the lesser of two evils.

But the other massive issue we face is the insane amount of money in the process. It was bad enough before Citizen's United, but that terrible ruling opened the cash floodgates. I'm not sure we'll ever get campaign finance reform when both sides don't want to give up their sugar daddies.

[Unregistered]

And the NYT saw fit to print the exoneration on page 16 after how many editions included stories about her emails on page 1?

Only the Repugs are interested in HRC -- largely due to Dufus Donald being so inept that there is nothing positive they can focus on ... so they go back to litigating the past... and lying about the future ...