Libs Cannot Outsmart Trump

[Unregistered]

Libtards,

You have been beaten by this man at every move.

First he shows everyone how crooked Hillary was, with the uranium 1 scandal, all the speaking fees, getting rich through "public service".

Then he turned your phony Russia hoax back on you with the fake dossier, which used foreign (Russian) actors in an attempt to meddle in US politics. Just wait for the IG report on the FISA abuses and political corruption of our institutions under Obama (just in time for the 2020 election).

Speaking of 2020 campaign season.

Trump completely takes out/destroys your front runner, even according to Maher:

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019...e-franken-did/

And in the process, he gets himself impeached - which is what he has been after from the beginning because it ensures his re-election.

You Libtards call him and his supporters stupid, but he continues to outsmart you over and over and over. You guys cant figure out how to beat him. You cant even frame him, with all of the intelligence agencies, swamp embeds in the DOJ, you own 90% of the media including Hollywood, the entire city of DC and all of its lawyers (who become judges) are Democrats. And yet you still cant beat him. Why is this? Is it that maybe you guys are the dummies and he and his supporters are the smart ones? The results so far speak louder than your claims do.

[Unregistered]

Further

Libtards,

You have been beaten by this man at every move.

First he shows everyone how crooked Hillary was, with the uranium 1 scandal, all the speaking fees, getting rich through "public service".

Then he turned your phony Russia hoax back on you with the fake dossier, which used foreign (Russian) actors in an attempt to meddle in US politics. Just wait for the IG report on the FISA abuses and political corruption of our institutions under Obama (just in time for the 2020 election).

Speaking of 2020 campaign season.

Trump completely takes out/destroys your front runner, even according to Maher:

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019...e-franken-did/

And in the process, he gets himself impeached - which is what he has been after from the beginning because it ensures his re-election.

You Libtards call him and his supporters stupid, but he continues to outsmart you over and over and over. You guys cant figure out how to beat him. You cant even frame him, with all of the intelligence agencies, swamp embeds in the DOJ, you own 90% of the media including Hollywood, the entire city of DC and all of its lawyers (who become judges) are Democrats. And yet you still cant beat him. Why is this? Is it that maybe you guys are the dummies and he and his supporters are the smart ones? The results so far speak louder than your claims do.

Trump played nervous Nancy like a fiddle. She is as dumb as a rock. Impeach over a phone call aimed at using his leverage (meeting in white house) to get Ukraine to cooperate with his DOJ in investigating the DNC server issue? And US related political corruption (selling of access to foreign entities)? What a laugh - bring it on. This is a fight Trump really wants to have, and Nancy is so stupid she fell for it. I almost feel sorry for her - she is no match for Trump.

If women want a counterpoise to male power they need to shift from liberal women (who are weak, irrational, immature and emotional) to conservative women (who are smart, even-keeled, mature, professional, rock solid tough and get results). Now that Bidens out of the way, I guess it will be fake-indian Warren. However, the first woman president in our history will be a Republican - and that will be a great day for America (but not for Libtards).
You heard it here first.

[Unregistered]

Bad News for Libs

Libtards,

You have been beaten by this man at every move.

First he shows everyone how crooked Hillary was, with the uranium 1 scandal, all the speaking fees, getting rich through "public service".

Then he turned your phony Russia hoax back on you with the fake dossier, which used foreign (Russian) actors in an attempt to meddle in US politics. Just wait for the IG report on the FISA abuses and political corruption of our institutions under Obama (just in time for the 2020 election).

Speaking of 2020 campaign season.

Trump completely takes out/destroys your front runner, even according to Maher:

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019...e-franken-did/

And in the process, he gets himself impeached - which is what he has been after from the beginning because it ensures his re-election.

You Libtards call him and his supporters stupid, but he continues to outsmart you over and over and over. You guys cant figure out how to beat him. You cant even frame him, with all of the intelligence agencies, swamp embeds in the DOJ, you own 90% of the media including Hollywood, the entire city of DC and all of its lawyers (who become judges) are Democrats. And yet you still cant beat him. Why is this? Is it that maybe you guys are the dummies and he and his supporters are the smart ones? The results so far speak louder than your claims do.

The reason they cant beat "him" is because its not "him".

Its the entirety of the American electorate.

The American electorate has had it with the corrupt swamp, double-talk politicians that say one thing then do another, never ran a business before in their lives, and corruptly self-enrich through "public service" which grants foreign adversaries lobbying power that the middle class lacks, and at their expense (e.g. Ukraine, especially China through Biden's corrupt family dealings).

America has finally woken up. Politics will never be the same here in the US. The GOP is now a populist party thanks to Trump. And while Trumps changes are a reflection of what voters want - corrupt establishment GOPers to be sidelined (most of them in congress are declining to defend their seats in next years elections - they cant beat Trump either - ask Billy Cristol), the DNC is still trying to rig primaries to subvert the will of their party like they did with Bernie and Clinton. Tells you which of the parties is responsive to their people, and which considers their people as stupid, needing to be told what is best for them.

[Unregistered]

Libtards,

You have been beaten by this man at every move.

First he shows everyone how crooked Hillary was, with the uranium 1 scandal, all the speaking fees, getting rich through "public service".

Then he turned your phony Russia hoax back on you with the fake dossier, which used foreign (Russian) actors in an attempt to meddle in US politics. Just wait for the IG report on the FISA abuses and political corruption of our institutions under Obama (just in time for the 2020 election).

Speaking of 2020 campaign season.

Trump completely takes out/destroys your front runner, even according to Maher:

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019...e-franken-did/

And in the process, he gets himself impeached - which is what he has been after from the beginning because it ensures his re-election.

You Libtards call him and his supporters stupid, but he continues to outsmart you over and over and over. You guys cant figure out how to beat him. You cant even frame him, with all of the intelligence agencies, swamp embeds in the DOJ, you own 90% of the media including Hollywood, the entire city of DC and all of its lawyers (who become judges) are Democrats. And yet you still cant beat him. Why is this? Is it that maybe you guys are the dummies and he and his supporters are the smart ones? The results so far speak louder than your claims do.

Too funny...

tRUMP is a Russian asset... results so far speak louder than your claims do...

[Unregistered]

The reason they cant beat "him" is because its not "him".

Its the entirety of the American electorate.

The American electorate has had it with the corrupt swamp, double-talk politicians that say one thing then do another, never ran a business before in their lives, and corruptly self-enrich through "public service" which grants foreign adversaries lobbying power that the middle class lacks, and at their expense (e.g. Ukraine, especially China through Biden's corrupt family dealings).

America has finally woken up. Politics will never be the same here in the US. The GOP is now a populist party thanks to Trump. And while Trumps changes are a reflection of what voters want - corrupt establishment GOPers to be sidelined (most of them in congress are declining to defend their seats in next years elections - they cant beat Trump either - ask Billy Cristol), the DNC is still trying to rig primaries to subvert the will of their party like they did with Bernie and Clinton. Tells you which of the parties is responsive to their people, and which considers their people as stupid, needing to be told what is best for them.

Even funnier.... the GOP is now a lame, immoral, ultimately corrupt and sidelined party.
tRUMP is a liar of monstrous proportion.... Putin's puppet.... the Commie Colluder...
telling his party what is 'Best" for him...

[Unregistered]

Too funny...

tRUMP is a Russian asset... results so far speak louder than your claims do...

Dude, how unoriginal can u be? You're just regurgitating everything Hillary says. Do you have any opinions of your own or are those puppet strings pulled too tight? My prediction came true this week. The libs are starting to eat their own while exposing their true agenda. You see if you don't follow the progressive playbook you too are labeled a Russia agent. Now its Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein in HRC crosshairs. This just lends credence that Russia was always a hoax. HRC is now saying the exact same (compromise Russia asset thing) about our Democratic congresswomen and service member. It was so bad most all the candidates came out in support of Tulsi. Well, there you have it. You know things are headed south for the democratic party when progressive liberal don't buy HRC's crap anymore. It's hard to believe you libtards are gonna let HRC ruin another election for you guys. Hey, you brought this on yourselves.

[Unregistered]

Dude, how unoriginal can u be? You're just regurgitating everything Hillary says. Do you have any opinions of your own or are those puppet strings pulled too tight? My prediction came true this week. The libs are starting to eat their own while exposing their true agenda. You see if you don't follow the progressive playbook you too are labeled a Russia agent. Now its Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein in HRC crosshairs. This just lends credence that Russia was always a hoax. HRC is now saying the exact same (compromise Russia asset thing) about our Democratic congresswomen and service member. It was so bad most all the candidates came out in support of Tulsi. Well, there you have it. You know things are headed south for the democratic party when progressive liberal don't buy HRC's crap anymore. It's hard to believe you libtards are gonna let HRC ruin another election for you guys. Hey, you brought this on yourselves.

Ho Ho Ho...

a) Start a new thread
b) Attack HRC
c) Deny then lie about tRUMP
d) Throw in some Ad Hominem attacks

Dude.... that is the very definition of unoriginal.... the usual lame Con playbook

tRUMP had what could only be described as one of the worst weeks ever endured by a person in the WH:
He dumped an ally, (then reversed himself); announced G7 at Doral (then reversed himself); got smacked by wet fish Mitch the Bitch (who did not reverse himself); got smacked also by Pansy Graham (who probably will reverse himself); was outed by Mulvaney for his Quid Pro Quo (who... yes... later reversed himself); had a multitude of folks testify against him to Congress; his personal lawyer (the one that isn't in prison) is the subject of a criminal investigation; ...... should I keep going?

but the cherry on the cake ....

You call this winning and original ... too f***ing funny....

Newsflash .... HRC isn't running in 2020 (except in your addled mind) .... and it is becoming increasingly likely that tRUMP won't be either...

Its hard to believe that you Repub-lickasses can't stand up to a bully.
Hey, you brought this on yourself.

[Unregistered]

Ho Ho Ho...

a) Start a new thread
b) Attack HRC
c) Deny then lie about tRUMP
d) Throw in some Ad Hominem attacks

Dude.... that is the very definition of unoriginal.... the usual lame Con playbook

tRUMP had what could only be described as one of the worst weeks ever endured by a person in the WH:
He dumped an ally, (then reversed himself); announced G7 at Doral (then reversed himself); got smacked by wet fish Mitch the Bitch (who did not reverse himself); got smacked also by Pansy Graham (who probably will reverse himself); was outed by Mulvaney for his Quid Pro Quo (who... yes... later reversed himself); had a multitude of folks testify against him to Congress; his personal lawyer (the one that isn't in prison) is the subject of a criminal investigation; ...... should I keep going?

but the cherry on the cake ....

You call this winning and original ... too f***ing funny....

Newsflash .... HRC isn't running in 2020 (except in your addled mind) .... and it is becoming increasingly likely that tRUMP won't be either...

Its hard to believe that you Repub-lickasses can't stand up to a bully.
Hey, you brought this on yourself.

TRIGGERED ALERT!!! You know you hit a nerve when you get this kinda rambling of BS response from a libtard. Point out how the Dems are losing, AGAIN and boom their heads explode. First off, look at the title. I think you’re on the wrong thread or were you outsmarted again? Second, you can’t use all my lines then then defend you originality. 😂 Third, we all know every week is Trump’s worse week in the eye of a libtard yet who is sitting in WH getting things done while your liberal queen is running Russian propaganda operations from her sofa. That’s what I thought. Forth, you can’t even see the self-inflicted damage you morons are doing to your a own party. Trump has been investigated 6 ways to Sunday and will be for the rest of his time in DC. That’s a given and pretty much every conservative knows the libtard playbook. Here’s the problem. The more digging you do on Trump, the more damage you’re doing to your own party. Think about it dumbass, HRC and now Biden have gone down as direct results of Trump witch-hunts. Like Trump they have never been found guilty of anything but guess who really has lost here. That’s right the Dems. In the court of public opinion, “do as we say not as we do” is a recipe for losing. Unfortunately that recipe sits at the top of the libtard menu. Hillary may or may not run but she is certainly controlling the narrative. She is trying to influence the election. The very same thing she has accused Russia of. Hmmm, that’s interesting. Maybe that Politico story about her colluding with Ukraine might have merit after all. The Dems are turning on themselves. HRC is trying to divide your party and you’re too stupid to see it. Me on the other hand, think it’s awesome. She’s definitely good at one thing...losing elections. Come on HRC, we’re counting on you once again. You brought it on yourselves !!!

[Unregistered]

Trump has hung himself all on his own.

[Unregistered]

TRIGGERED ALERT!!! You know you hit a nerve when you get this kinda rambling of BS response from a libtard. Point out how the Dems are losing, AGAIN and boom their heads explode. First off, look at the title. I think you’re on the wrong thread or were you outsmarted again? Second, you can’t use all my lines then then defend you originality. 😂 Third, we all know every week is Trump’s worse week in the eye of a libtard yet who is sitting in WH getting things done while your liberal queen is running Russian propaganda operations from her sofa. That’s what I thought. Forth, you can’t even see the self-inflicted damage you morons are doing to your a own party. Trump has been investigated 6 ways to Sunday and will be for the rest of his time in DC. That’s a given and pretty much every conservative knows the libtard playbook. Here’s the problem. The more digging you do on Trump, the more damage you’re doing to your own party. Think about it dumbass, HRC and now Biden have gone down as direct results of Trump witch-hunts. Like Trump they have never been found guilty of anything but guess who really has lost here. That’s right the Dems. In the court of public opinion, “do as we say not as we do” is a recipe for losing. Unfortunately that recipe sits at the top of the libtard menu. Hillary may or may not run but she is certainly controlling the narrative. She is trying to influence the election. The very same thing she has accused Russia of. Hmmm, that’s interesting. Maybe that Politico story about her colluding with Ukraine might have merit after all. The Dems are turning on themselves. HRC is trying to divide your party and you’re too stupid to see it. Me on the other hand, think it’s awesome. She’s definitely good at one thing...losing elections. Come on HRC, we’re counting on you once again. You brought it on yourselves !!!

I actually laughed out loud at you calling the *other* post a rambling response. Thanks for the Sunday morning chuckle.

Your posts have devolved into nothing more than regurgitating the unsubstantiated drivel you hear on Breitbart, Hannity, and Rush. I would have more respect for you if you actually made a logical argument in your own words, or posted links to reputable sources to back up your claims. The Hillary obsession is especially laughable, in light of her recent exoneration by Trump's own Department of Justice.

The only point in your gish gallop of nonsense seems to be that because Trump is still in office he must be in the right. Even a drooling sycophant like you must realize that won't work much longer.

[Unregistered]

I actually laughed out loud at you calling the *other* post a rambling response. Thanks for the Sunday morning chuckle.

Your posts have devolved into nothing more than regurgitating the unsubstantiated drivel you hear on Breitbart, Hannity, and Rush. I would have more respect for you if you actually made a logical argument in your own words, or posted links to reputable sources to back up your claims. The Hillary obsession is especially laughable, in light of her recent exoneration by Trump's own Department of Justice.

The only point in your gish gallop of nonsense seems to be that because Trump is still in office he must be in the right. Even a drooling sycophant like you must realize that won't work much longer.

Let’s break this down there, Stawman!

Do you deny HRC is calling TG a Russian asset? Does she have proof of that? Why won’t she provide the voters with that evidence? Or is this just another fabricated hoax concocted to take out someone with different views? Where have we seen this playbook before?

Do u think HRC is controlling the democratic narrative right now by calling Democratic congresswoman Gabbard and Jill Stein Russian assets?

Do you think she using her political standing to influence the upcoming election?

Maybe you could stop the whataboitisms long enough to answer. I find it hard that you keep defending this pattern of behavior.

[Unregistered]

Let’s break this down there, Stawman!

1. Do you deny HRC is calling TG a Russian asset? Does she have proof of that? Why won’t she provide the voters with that evidence? Or is this just another fabricated hoax concocted to take out someone with different views? Where have we seen this playbook before?

2. Do u think HRC is controlling the democratic narrative right now by calling Democratic congresswoman Gabbard and Jill Stein Russian assets?

3. Do you think she using her political standing to influence the upcoming election?

4. Maybe you could stop the whataboitisms long enough to answer. I find it hard that you keep defending this pattern of behavior.

1. Of course I don't deny it. It's right there in the news. It would be nice if you acknowledged widely reported events that show Trump is compromised by Russia, but you refuse to acknowledge anything contrary to your narrative, even if well-substantiated.

Gabbard has refused to deny the claims being made by HRC. It's a fact that several well-known Russian propaganda outlets are promoting her. That's not proof, of course, but I hold open the possibility until better information is available.

2. No. This is a sideshow. You tend to get distracted by unimportant but salacious news reports. Smart voters won't fall for it.

3. She has the right to state her opinion, just like any other public figure. It's up to the public to take what she says, weigh it against available evidence, and decide for themselves. When is the last time you did that instead of blindly swallowing what Hannity, Rush, or Trump's twitter account are spoon-feeding you?

4. There are my answers, without whataboutisms. I find it troubling that you continue to defend the anti-American talking points being promoted by the Kremlin. Vladimir Putin would like nothing more than to have the U.S. president become a dictator without any oversight from the other branches of government.

Please acknowledge that Trump's own State Department has exonerated HRC from any email-related wrongdoing during the 2016 campaign. It's time to drop that particular lie:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ate-department
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/polit...ver/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/polit...ion/index.html

P.S. please google the definition of strawman. You don't appear to understand what it actually means. Also please note the correct spelling.

[Unregistered]

1. Of course I don't deny it. It's right there in the news. It would be nice if you acknowledged widely reported events that show Trump is compromised by Russia, but you refuse to acknowledge anything contrary to your narrative, even if well-substantiated.

Gabbard has refused to deny the claims being made by HRC. It's a fact that several well-known Russian propaganda outlets are promoting her. That's not proof, of course, but I hold open the possibility until better information is available.

2. No. This is a sideshow. You tend to get distracted by unimportant but salacious news reports. Smart voters won't fall for it.

3. She has the right to state her opinion, just like any other public figure. It's up to the public to take what she says, weigh it against available evidence, and decide for themselves. When is the last time you did that instead of blindly swallowing what Hannity, Rush, or Trump's twitter account are spoon-feeding you?

4. There are my answers, without whataboutisms. I find it troubling that you continue to defend the anti-American talking points being promoted by the Kremlin. Vladimir Putin would like nothing more than to have the U.S. president become a dictator without any oversight from the other branches of government.

Please acknowledge that Trump's own State Department has exonerated HRC from any email-related wrongdoing during the 2016 campaign. It's time to drop that particular lie:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ate-department
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/polit...ver/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/polit...ion/index.html

P.S. please google the definition of strawman. You don't appear to understand what it actually means. Also please note the correct spelling.

1) There is so much more to life than MSNBC panels. Not only did she deny it and called out Hillary for the world to see, she flat out says she a democrat and would not run as a third-party candidate. This directly contradicts HRC's ridiculous conspiracy theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNjzBJWUyWI

2) Sideshow? Really? That's what you call it? For 3 years you libtards have been swimming in the proverbial sideshow cesspool. I think you mean clown show because that's exactly what this is. Smart voters won't fall for it? Oh really. Well seems like these side/clown shows have taken down HRC and most likely Biden. Two powerhouses of the democratic party. I think they fell for it! You might wanna reevaluate your prognostication skills.

3) Gee, "right to her opinion just like any other public opinion"? Hang on, I just choked on your hypocrisy. How many times have you heard "did you hear want Trump just said about that person" or "can you believe what Trump believes about that issue"...HE MUST BE IMPEACHED!!! I think you meant to say "just like any other public figure except Trump".
You see the problem with the libtard hypocrisy is words matter. That's why your argument never holds up. HRC has opinions and it's her right. Trump has his opinions and he must be impeached. FYI, I didn't fall it. I'm still waiting on HRC's evidence that TG is a Russian asset.

4) Exonerated HRC? This is precious. If you don't mind, I'll take your "weigh it against available evidence, and decide for themselves." What the liberal media doesn't want to world to know is that the investigation was done only on the available emails turned over by the Clinton Team. That's right. Let that sink in. Of the emails that were not destroyed, 588 violation occurred and 91 one those emails found on her private server contained classified information. They were able to conclude that of the emails "turned over", no systemic mishandling of emails had occurred. Funny thing is the libtards are celebrating this as a victory. Well if you need a pat on the back for doing what was required of you to do all along well here you go...Congrats. The problem is there were over 30,000 emails destroyed, never to be seen by investigators. Oops, that's a little inconvenient for a total exoneration argument. Think about this, if they found classified information on the ones she turned over, what the hell was on the ones she destroyed? LOL. For a guy who is all about the "truth" of matters, why don't you acknowledge that part of the story? Give people the evidence and let them weigh the truth.

[Unregistered]

1) There is so much more to life than MSNBC panels. Not only did she deny it and called out Hillary for the world to see, she flat out says she a democrat and would not run as a third-party candidate. This directly contradicts HRC's ridiculous conspiracy theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNjzBJWUyWI

2) Sideshow? Really? That's what you call it? For 3 years you libtards have been swimming in the proverbial sideshow cesspool. I think you mean clown show because that's exactly what this is. Smart voters won't fall for it? Oh really. Well seems like these side/clown shows have taken down HRC and most likely Biden. Two powerhouses of the democratic party. I think they fell for it! You might wanna reevaluate your prognostication skills.

3) Gee, "right to her opinion just like any other public opinion"? Hang on, I just choked on your hypocrisy. How many times have you heard "did you hear want Trump just said about that person" or "can you believe what Trump believes about that issue"...HE MUST BE IMPEACHED!!! I think you meant to say "just like any other public figure except Trump".
You see the problem with the libtard hypocrisy is words matter. That's why your argument never holds up. HRC has opinions and it's her right. Trump has his opinions and he must be impeached. FYI, I didn't fall it. I'm still waiting on HRC's evidence that TG is a Russian asset.

4) Exonerated HRC? This is precious. If you don't mind, I'll take your "weigh it against available evidence, and decide for themselves." What the liberal media doesn't want to world to know is that the investigation was done only on the available emails turned over by the Clinton Team. That's right. Let that sink in. Of the emails that were not destroyed, 588 violation occurred and 91 one those emails found on her private server contained classified information. They were able to conclude that of the emails "turned over", no systemic mishandling of emails had occurred. Funny thing is the libtards are celebrating this as a victory. Well if you need a pat on the back for doing what was required of you to do all along well here you go...Congrats. The problem is there were over 30,000 emails destroyed, never to be seen by investigators. Oops, that's a little inconvenient for a total exoneration argument. Think about this, if they found classified information on the ones she turned over, what the hell was on the ones she destroyed? LOL. For a guy who is all about the "truth" of matters, why don't you acknowledge that part of the story? Give people the evidence and let them weigh the truth.

I only have so much time to expose your bullsh!t, so I'll only cover #1 for now.

Did you actually watch that youtube clip? If so, please tell me where in that clip she denied what HRC is accusing her of. I watched all 5 minutes, and all I heard was her re-stating what HRC said and dodging the question of whether she was concerned about Russian meddling in the 2020 election. There is no denial.

I have an open mind, but it's hard to ignore this:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...abbard-n964261

"Since Gabbard announced her intention to run on Jan. 11, there have been at least 20 Gabbard stories on three major Moscow-based English-language websites affiliated with or supportive of the Russian government: RT, the Russian-owned TV outlet; Sputnik News, a radio outlet; and Russia Insider, a blog that experts say closely follows the Kremlin line. The CIA has called RT and Sputnik part of "Russia's state-run propaganda machine."

"All three sites celebrated Gabbard's announcement, defended her positions on Russia and her 2017 meeting with Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, and attacked those who have suggested she is a pawn for Moscow. The coverage devoted to Gabbard, both in news and commentary, exceeds that afforded to any of the declared or rumored Democratic candidates despite Gabbard's lack of voter recognition."

If HRC's accusations are false, you have to come up with an innocent explanation for this. Let's hear your innocent explanation.

[Unregistered]

Different poster - ^ I'm not convinced she's s willing Russian asset but I have no doubt the Russians are trying to prop her up. She doesn't even register in US polling yet a foreign country giving one candidate so much attention in a very early and very crowded field just is not normal. You find the BBC doing multiple pieces on her. Putin knows a 3rd party candidate can shave valuable votes off in a tight race. Stein and Johnson did better than average in the three states Trump won to give him the EC victory. There also was higher than average FB traffic in those states and multiple attempts to infiltrate voting systems there. I also don't think they knew what was going on, even though we know Stein met Putin. Useful idiots don't have to know they're being used.