Trump is going to screw Biden over so hard

[Unregistered]

It's telling that the pro-Trump crowd likes to point out wrongdoing by the left and call the anti-Trump crowd hypocrites as if they support that behavior. When the anti-Trump crowd says wrongdoing should be punished regardless of political affiliation, the pro-Trumpers can't process that (I've never seen a comeback to that type of comment). They think everybody sees the world through partisan glasses, just like they do. Scary.

If the anti-Trump crowd says that "wrongdoing should be punished regardless of political affiliation" so why aren't they or didn't they look into Godfather Joe's threats; the meeting on the tarmac; the classified documents on Weiner's computer sent by HC; Comey coverups and testifying about it; ALL of the other questionable actions that occurred during prior to Trump taking office?

The American people want justice to be evenly distributed. It's not. The media won't take off their partisan glasses.

What exactly has AOC and her team done to help America? She is another full of partisan spewing hyperbole. That's not getting laws passed; laws constructed; diplomacy with foreign nations finalized; new trade agreements constructed and passed.

We should be pissed that the elected officials with guaranteed salaries and benefits, including sweet retirement benefits, on our tax dollar are NOT doing anything for us, the voter. They are just trying to sucker punch each other.

I would love for Trump's people to try and get traction with the Congressional term limits thing heading forward again. Get this idiots (both sides) outta there.

[Unregistered]

Which IG? There are literally dozens in the US government and Trump needs to be concerned about more than one.

As a liberal, I have no problem whatsoever with every last IG in the government investigating any and all credible claims of fraud, abuse, corruption, and crime no matter who is involved. That's literally their job and they better darned well be doing it.

As an American, I have a serious problem with the AG acting as if the DOJ is the personal law firm and fixer firm for the president. I find it more than a little hypocritical that folks who had conniption fits over the Clinton-***** tarmac encounter think Barr's behavior in office has been super normal and legit.

As a liberal, you have a serious problem with everything Trump. I don't recall seeing your deep concern when the Obama administration weaponized the IRS to target conservative groups. Gee, is that the job of the IRS? For fook sake, would you stop with the hypocrisy already? The AG is the highest LEO in the land and there are serious concerns and accusations that laws were broken on both sides. If you guys are squeaky clean, let him do his investigations. You have nothing to worry about. I find the hypocrisy astonishing that you guys only want Trump investigated. Really? Why is that? Don't all members in DC work for us?

[Unregistered]

*get these (not this) idiots outta here.

Need an edit button added....Mr. Admin?

[Unregistered]

As a liberal, you have a serious problem with everything Trump. I don't recall seeing your deep concern when the Obama administration weaponized the IRS to target conservative groups. Gee, is that the job of the IRS? For fook sake, would you stop with the hypocrisy already? The AG is the highest LEO in the land and there are serious concerns and accusations that laws were broken on both sides. If you guys are squeaky clean, let him do his investigations. You have nothing to worry about. I find the hypocrisy astonishing that you guys only want Trump investigated. Really? Why is that? Don't all members in DC work for us?

Exactly, read post #211 as well. If there is wrongdoing, then ALL of it needs to be investigated, both sides.

[Unregistered]

Somebody appreciates facts and the truth.

Feel free to worship that red map Trump tweeted. You know. The one that:

* erroneously shows multiple counties won by Clinton as red, including Orange County, California; Washoe County, Nevada; Lake County, Minnesota; Gallatin County, Montana; and Whitman County, Washington.

* shows Trump won more landmass than Clinton as a lot of those red counties have tiny populations -- Last time I checked, land doesn't vote. Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming are 83 times the size of Los Angeles County in area despite having half as many voters for example.

* Showed Alaska as entirely red when an accurate representation is largely blue.

If the map were accurate, it would still be meaningless beyond the distortion caused by relative population density.

Because support for impeachment isn't predicated by previous vote tallies. Nixon won handily and look what happened to him.

Nice pivot away from the false claim that HRC suffered the worst upset in political history with another easily debunked piece of propaganda though. You were talking about the red map indeed. Yeah right. We all believe that.

Does it give you any pause that we're talking about verifiable numbers, not even opinions, and you still can't admit to being wrong? Care to rebut my claim that 2+2=4?

Can't argue with stupid. That whole election loss still burning your ass. You're right the Democratic candidate with a predicted 99% chance to win the election was robbed of the Whitehouse. Unlike her, you win! ;)

[Unregistered]

I don't recall seeing your deep concern when the Obama administration weaponized the IRS to target conservative groups.

You can't recall it because I wasn't communicating with you at that time.

I happen to agree with you. The IRS should not do anything except follow regs in determining which groups are granted tax-exempt status and which are not. Conversely, they should also be doing due diligence to insure that behavior that violates the tax code results in groups losing their tax-exempt status. They don't do that nearly as often as they should.

I'm particularly troubled by the loss of emails related to the scandal. That's unconscionable and the people involved need to be held accountable.

[Unregistered]

Can't argue with stupid. That whole election loss still burning your ass. You're right the Democratic candidate with a predicted 99% chance to win the election was robbed of the Whitehouse. Unlike her, you win! ;)

You're giving up because you cannot argue with numbers. Please reference the post where I said she was robbed of the White House. I'll wait.

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2575970]I just want to make sure I'm reading this right. #1 was "Trump chose to side with Vladimir Putin over his own intelligence agencies on the subject of Russian interference in the 2016 election". This was at the Helsinki summit last summer, and was reported by nearly every major news organization, including Fox News. You are saying you don't believe any of those reports?[/QUOT

The last time you tried to answer my questions, you looked like an idiot trying to justify your hard cold evidence as well-reasoned opinion. It's no wonder why you continue to ignore mine. Cowards do that. I have answered all of your questions. Now its time to step up to the plate. Tick Tock!!! Wanna Xanax first to calm your nerves?

[Unregistered]

Exactly, read post #211 as well. If there is wrongdoing, then ALL of it needs to be investigated, both sides.

Post 211 seems to claim that wrongdoing wasn't investigated by listing a bunch of incidents that were investigated and scrutinized to death. I think the objection is that they don't like it when an investigation exonerates someone on the left rather than putting them in a noose. If the finding wasn't guilty, then the incident wasn't investigated. A rather curious circular logic.

[Unregistered]

You should know by now that Trump loves and manufactures fake maps just as much as he loves and manufactures fake news - ie, the doctored fake map he rolled out at the hurricane news conference.

He's just a petulant and doltish I'm imbecile.

Maybe we should abolish the Electoral College. LOL!

[Unregistered]

My phone just lit up like a Christmas tree with texts from people watching the press conference with the Finnish president. A lot of people telling me he's even worse than usual. That's hard to fathom.

It was really disturbing, like you said more so than usual. He's sent out like 150 twitter-rants in the last few days as well, because, you know, he has nothing better to do with his time.

[Unregistered]

Maybe we should abolish the Electoral College. LOL!

It would be more democratic and representative if we did. As it is, some voters votes count more than others. Suspect it won't go away any time soon though.

[Unregistered]

Post 211 seems to claim that wrongdoing wasn't investigated by listing a bunch of incidents that were investigated and scrutinized to death. I think the objection is that they don't like it when an investigation exonerates someone on the left rather than putting them in a noose. If the finding wasn't guilty, then the incident wasn't investigated. A rather curious circular logic.

It's all cons and Trump have. No wonder he' went after Biden and now Clinton - again. I'm waiting for him to drag Obama into it as well. Most voters don't care about the past. What's he doing for us in the hear and now and in the future?

[Unregistered]

It's telling that the pro-Trump crowd likes to point out wrongdoing by the left and call the anti-Trump crowd hypocrites as if they support that behavior. When the anti-Trump crowd says wrongdoing should be punished regardless of political affiliation, the pro-Trumpers can't process that (I've never seen a comeback to that type of comment). They think everybody sees the world through partisan glasses, just like they do. Scary.

I disagree. What Dems fail to see is for every accusation, concern or scandal that you implicate Trump in, the Dems have at one time stepped into that same pile of crap. What the Liberals try to do is deflect, ignore, and push aside any and all responsibility. When their response is "it doesn't matter she's not the president" or "Yeah, but that happened in 2016" or "that's old news" it just goes to show their unrelenting bias. I never said Trump is perfect, far from it, but which one of your liberal deities is? We'd be better served if we all could admit they are ALL shady!

[Unregistered]

It would be more democratic and representative if we did. As it is, some voters votes count more than others. Suspect it won't go away any time soon though.

Oh, I'd love to hear this one. Please tell me how getting rid of the electoral college would be more democratic and representative.