Trump is going to screw Biden over so hard

[Unregistered]

So I hear “in my mind” and “my guess is” as your proof Trump collided with Russia. Therefore, all your previous slanderous posts were your opinion. Funny how you lecture people on the difference between truth, facts, and opinion. Let me show you how none of your past rants hold any water. You ready? In my mind and my guess, Trump is innocent of all charges and accusations. Boom he is now innocent. See how fûcking ridiculous your rants are. “My guess is” When you say Trump is a child rapist and Russian agent, you’re just pulling shît out of your ass. Of course that’s just “in my mind”.

Ad hominem attacks, what a surprise. You clearly don't understand the difference between well-reasoned opinion based on facts, and opinions based on alt-right delusions and conspiracy theories.

I answered you questions, now answer mine. Se post #759 in the Breaking News thread. My questions are:
1. Do you believe these things actually happened, and
2. Assuming yes (because there's no hope for you if you deny these facts) let's hear your innocent explanations for these behaviors

Whataboutisms don't count as explanations. I'll wait for your intelligent and well reasoned response. Opinions are ok.

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2575487]Ad hominem attacks, what a surprise. You clearly don't understand the difference between well-reasoned opinion based on facts, and opinions based on alt-right delusions and conspiracy theories.

I answered you questions, now answer mine. Se post #759 in the Breaking News thread. My questions are:
1. Do you believe these things actually happened, and
2. Assuming yes (because there's no hope for you if you deny these facts) let's hear your innocent explanations for these behaviors

Whataboutisms don't count as explanations. I'll wait for your intelligent and well reasoned response. Opinions are

Oh I see now! Only the radial left can have well-reasoned opinions. Everything the conservative says is alt-right delusions. Tell me something. Are there any facts that DNC paid for dirt on Trump? Are there any facts that prior to the 2016 election the Clinton campaign colluded with Ukraine in order to get more dirt. Are they any facts that Biden threatened to withhold US aid if the prosecutor who was looking into his sons business dealing was fired. Or are these just delusions and conspiracy theories? Now that we have established all your rants are simply opinion do you really think people give a damn what opinion you or I have. How big of a narcissist are you to think your opinion matters over anybody’s else’s. The amount of ego is your defense of “well-reasoned opinions is astonishing. Not sure who’s head is bigger yours or Trumps. And to your point about “whataboutisms” you might wanna look up that meaning again. You have been using it wrong this whole time I just didn’t have the heart to tell you seeing how it’s your favorite expression

Now to answer your questions:
1). Simply an opinion piece by the NPR author. I read it and again no factual evidence. I will say this however, did you really expect Trump to embrace our own intelligence community when they were the central players in trying to “stop him” with an “insurance policy”. Really? You expect Trump to trust an agency where top-tiered agents wanna him to lose 100,000,000 to 0.

2). I honesty don’t know enough about this topic to have a “well-reasoned opinion. I will say he is not the first president to get his history wrong.

3). This one I have answered before. Trump is a negotiator. That’s what he does. Right or wrong he sees value having them at the negotiating table. Moreover he could do it on the world stage so everyone could see what is being negotiated without being scrutinized for picking up the phone every time he calls a world leader. I see you Australia and Ukraine.

[Unregistered]

Oh I see now! Only the radial left can have well-reasoned opinions. Everything the conservative says is alt-right delusions. Tell me something. Are there any facts that DNC paid for dirt on Trump? Are there any facts that prior to the 2016 election the Clinton campaign colluded with Ukraine in order to get more dirt. Are they any facts that Biden threatened to withhold US aid if the prosecutor who was looking into his sons business dealing was fired. Or are these just delusions and conspiracy theories? Now that we have established all your rants are simply opinion do you really think people give a damn what opinion you or I have. How big of a narcissist are you to think your opinion matters over anybody’s else’s. The amount of ego is your defense of “well-reasoned opinions is astonishing. Not sure who’s head is bigger yours or Trumps. And to your point about “whataboutisms” you might wanna look up that meaning again. You have been using it wrong this whole time I just didn’t have the heart to tell you seeing how it’s your favorite expression

Now to answer your questions:
1). Simply an opinion piece by the NPR author. I read it and again no factual evidence. I will say this however, did you really expect Trump to embrace our own intelligence community when they were the central players in trying to “stop him” with an “insurance policy”. Really? You expect Trump to trust an agency where top-tiered agents wanna him to lose 100,000,000 to 0.

2). I honesty don’t know enough about this topic to have a “well-reasoned opinion. I will say he is not the first president to get his history wrong.

3). This one I have answered before. Trump is a negotiator. That’s what he does. Right or wrong he sees value having them at the negotiating table. Moreover he could do it on the world stage so everyone could see what is being negotiated without being scrutinized for picking up the phone every time he calls a world leader. I see you Australia and Ukraine.

Your answers are a joke. Let me remind you of the events I'm referring to:
1. Trump chose to side with Vladimir Putin over his own intelligence agencies on the subject of Russian interference in the 2016 election
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/17/62960...ering-whats-up

2. Trump defended Soviet Union's 1979 invasion of Afghanistan
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/03/polit...ion/index.html

3. Trump said Russia should be readmitted to the G7
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/20/u...russia-g7.html

4. NATO has felt incapable of taking a hard line with President Vladimir Putin over his weapons program in part because of US President Donald Trump's troublingly friendly approach to Russia.
https://www.businessinsider.com/nato...sources-2019-8

Are you actually suggesting that these things didn't happen? Seriously? You think it's "opinion" that Trump sided with Putin over his own IC? Do I need to show you the video?

#2 isn't Trump getting history wrong - it's him repeating Russian propaganda that had no support among his own IC, his own advisors, or anyone in the right-wing or left-wing media. So where did it come from?

If #3 is him negotiating please explain what the US has to gain by him taking this position. What's the goal?

You forgot to comment on #4.

Please try again to answer my simple, fair, and straightforward questions.

[Unregistered]

Your answers are a joke. Let me remind you of the events I'm referring to:
1. Trump chose to side with Vladimir Putin over his own intelligence agencies on the subject of Russian interference in the 2016 election
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/17/62960...ering-whats-up

2. Trump defended Soviet Union's 1979 invasion of Afghanistan
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/03/polit...ion/index.html

3. Trump said Russia should be readmitted to the G7
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/20/u...russia-g7.html

4. NATO has felt incapable of taking a hard line with President Vladimir Putin over his weapons program in part because of US President Donald Trump's troublingly friendly approach to Russia.
https://www.businessinsider.com/nato...sources-2019-8

Are you actually suggesting that these things didn't happen? Seriously? You think it's "opinion" that Trump sided with Putin over his own IC? Do I need to show you the video?

#2 isn't Trump getting history wrong - it's him repeating Russian propaganda that had no support among his own IC, his own advisors, or anyone in the right-wing or left-wing media. So where did it come from?

If #3 is him negotiating please explain what the US has to gain by him taking this position. What's the goal?

You forgot to comment on #4.

Please try again to answer my simple, fair, and straightforward questions.

Why are u blaming Trump for NATO’s incompetence. Seriously 28 other countries are powerless against Russia? You can’t be serious. Once again you pick an opinion piece to drive your narrative. It doesn’t even make sense . So if let me get this straight, if Russia would attack France or Germany that would defend themselves because of Trump. And you actually believe this shît. Just gives more credence that they need to come back to the negotiation table. Obviously they need Trump to speak for them.

What does he have to gain. Try asking Obama what he had to gain while he whispered he’ll have more flexibility with Putin. Really are u that stupid. Obama had dialogue with Putin throughout his presidency and not one time did you call him a compromised traitor. Where are the transcripts for that flexibility phone call. Trump is the first president to step foot in NK after Obama said it couldn’t be done. That’s what Trump does. He confronts these dictators from other countries and doesn’t bow down to them or right checks for millions of dollars so countries won’t bomb us. Are you that naive to think this stuff doesn’t happen. Of course it does.

[Unregistered]

Pompeo is threatening no cooperation with state department staff and the investigation. Add obstruction and witness tampering/threats to the list of his misdeeds.

[Unregistered]

Why are u blaming Trump for NATO’s incompetence. Seriously 28 other countries are powerless against Russia? You can’t be serious. Once again you pick an opinion piece to drive your narrative. It doesn’t even make sense . So if let me get this straight, if Russia would attack France or Germany that would defend themselves because of Trump. And you actually believe this shît. Just gives more credence that they need to come back to the negotiation table. Obviously they need Trump to speak for them.

What does he have to gain. Try asking Obama what he had to gain while he whispered he’ll have more flexibility with Putin. Really are u that stupid. Obama had dialogue with Putin throughout his presidency and not one time did you call him a compromised traitor. Where are the transcripts for that flexibility phone call. Trump is the first president to step foot in NK after Obama said it couldn’t be done. That’s what Trump does. He confronts these dictators from other countries and doesn’t bow down to them or right checks for millions of dollars so countries won’t bomb us. Are you that naive to think this stuff doesn’t happen. Of course it does.

It really isn't a hard question, yet you tie yourself in knots to avoid answering. One more time: Do you or do you not believe those 4 things actually happened?

[Unregistered]

Pompeo is threatening no cooperation with state department staff and the investigation. Add obstruction and witness tampering/threats to the list of his misdeeds.

Please tell us what he said the reason was. That would put things into context.

[Unregistered]

It really isn't a hard question, yet you tie yourself in knots to avoid answering. One more time: Do you or do you not believe those 4 things actually happened?

You obviously didn't read my response. Or was it a "whataboutism" LOL! But, I did notice you avoided mine, AGAIN. Gee shocker!

[Unregistered]

Please tell us what he said the reason was. That would put things into context.

"In his letter to the chairman, Pompeo characterized the effort to depose the officials as “an attempt to intimidate, bully, and treat improperly, the distinguished professionals of the Department of State.”

Hilarious coming from this administration. Trump wants the WB executed for being a "spy".

[Unregistered]

Just a classic example of you never condemning anything the left does.

Calm down there, Sparky. Didn't mean to trigger you.

Apparently you didn't read down to where I said this: "As far as I'm concerned, let all of these folks be fairly and thoroughly investigated. Democrats, Republicans, Ukrainians, Russians, whatever. And let the chips fall where they may. If it cleans up future elections, I'm perfectly fine with members of both parties paying for their crimes. Can you say that?"

Now let's think about something logically. IF the Ukrainian interference in the election was illegal and in favor of Trump's opponent, why would Trump - a guy who rages at real and perceived political enemies - not have made it a bigger story than one Politico piece (that doesn't substantiate what you think it does) and had his DOJ investigate and prosecute the Clinton campaign immediately and vigorously? If there was something there, they'd have shouted it to the rooftop daily while Mueller was investigating Russian interference. It's their modus operandi. The fact that they didn't is rather telling, don't you think?

[Unregistered]

"In his letter to the chairman, Pompeo characterized the effort to depose the officials as “an attempt to intimidate, bully, and treat improperly, the distinguished professionals of the Department of State.”

Hilarious coming from this administration. Trump wants the WB executed for being a "spy".

Sounds like a legit reason. Certainly Obama, Pelosi, or any other department would want the same for their employees. Hell, Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich just came out saying she felt “enormous pressure” from her own party to change her position. If that’s the case, Imagine how they’re treating this administration. Admit it, you’re just trying to sound your liberal dog whistle. Compared to your other posts, this one is pretty lame.

[Unregistered]

Calm down there, Sparky. Didn't mean to trigger you.

Apparently you didn't read down to where I said this: "As far as I'm concerned, let all of these folks be fairly and thoroughly investigated. Democrats, Republicans, Ukrainians, Russians, whatever. And let the chips fall where they may. If it cleans up future elections, I'm perfectly fine with members of both parties paying for their crimes. Can you say that?"

Now let's think about something logically. IF the Ukrainian interference in the election was illegal and in favor of Trump's opponent, why would Trump - a guy who rages at real and perceived political enemies - not have made it a bigger story than one Politico piece (that doesn't substantiate what you think it does) and had his DOJ investigate and prosecute the Clinton campaign immediately and vigorously? If there was something there, they'd have shouted it to the rooftop daily wMueller was investigating Russian interference. It's their modus operandi. The fact that they didn't is rather telling, don't you think?

I absolutely can say the same. Why do u think I spend the time to point out all the liberal hypocrisy. Glad to see it has started to open some eyes to the shady shît that happens on both sides everyday. If you’re serious about thinking logically, who really controls the political narrative in this country? Here’s a hint: the liberal media. If they don’t want it out there, it is buried. Take the Epstein scandal. That alone would have taken Trump down. Liberals were prepared to go to the ends of the earth Trump to implicate Trump in child sex trafficking. Here’s the problem, Bill Clinton was sitting there somewhere in the mix. That story literally disappeared overnight. Nobody wanted to dig anymore. Liberals went suspiciously quiet with zero uproar after he was dead. All you have to do is change the hats. It’s really that simple. Example: Trump and the RNC pays a Russian operative money to dig up dirt on HRC. 27 investigations and years later We would still be talking about it today. Here’s another: Trump aides delete 30,000 emails and destroy multiple phones used by Trump. Again, we would still be talking about that today. The liberal media would be in 24 hour-a-day meltdown. How bout that Politico story: Trump colluded with Ukraine for intel on HRC prior to the 2016 elections. You wanna know why I’m right, because the radial left wanted to impeach him for taking a sharpie to a weather map and I suppose that’s logical thinking. Can u honestly say Trump gets a fair shake from the liberal media. How often do they report any of his accomplishments? I know, I know he hasn’t had any, right?

A lot of these investigations are still under investigation or currently being reopened. The roaches are starting to scatter on bth sides. There are a bunch of uneasy folks in DC who never thought would be exposed. This will be fun to watch!

[Unregistered]

Calm down there, Sparky. Didn't mean to trigger you.

Apparently you didn't read down to where I said this: "As far as I'm concerned, let all of these folks be fairly and thoroughly investigated. Democrats, Republicans, Ukrainians, Russians, whatever. And let the chips fall where they may. If it cleans up future elections, I'm perfectly fine with members of both parties paying for their crimes. Can you say that?"

Now let's think about something logically. IF the Ukrainian interference in the election was illegal and in favor of Trump's opponent, why would Trump - a guy who rages at real and perceived political enemies - not have made it a bigger story than one Politico piece (that doesn't substantiate what you think it does) and had his DOJ investigate and prosecute the Clinton campaign immediately and vigorously? If there was something there, they'd have shouted it to the rooftop daily while Mueller was investigating Russian interference. It's their modus operandi. The fact that they didn't is rather telling, don't you think?

Trump has had nearly 3 years to investigate Clinton but didn't do a thing. Biden too. Once Biden entered the race the race was on to dig up dirt in him. Investigating HRC is a nice touch for added distraction

[Unregistered]

Sounds like a legit reason. Certainly Obama, Pelosi, or any other department would want the same for their employees. Hell, Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich just came out saying she felt “enormous pressure” from her own party to change her position. If that’s the case, Imagine how they’re treating this administration. Admit it, you’re just trying to sound your liberal dog whistle. Compared to your other posts, this one is pretty lame.

Sen Chuck Grassley breaking with the GOP saying the WB acted appropriately and should be protected.

[Unregistered]

Trump has had nearly 3 years to investigate Clinton but didn't do a thing. Biden too. Once Biden entered the race the race was on to dig up dirt in him. Investigating HRC is a nice touch for added distraction

Let me ask you this simple question? Who picked the fight? Who started the dirt digging? Trump just ante’d up and decided to take a seat at this political take down table. This will be awesome to watch.