He's dangerous and people are going to get hurt.

[Unregistered]

https://sf.eater.com/2019/7/19/20701...acific-heights

Don't forget to include the socialist commie restaurateur who viciously allowed employees to decline from serving Don Jr. and aggressively donated the proceeds from the dinner to charity. The horrors the left subjects Republicans to while just trying to dine in peace is brutal and heart-wrenching. For shame!

Answer the question in post #27 please

[Unregistered]

Answer the question in post #27 please

Alas, satire is also a casualty of this administration. I'm not the poster claiming liberals are equally as violent. I am the one who rebutted his list of misrepresented examples. I was trying to make fun of him including the Red Hen and Mexican restaurant incidents. These folks are so far out there, it is impossible to poke fun of their gullibility and hyperbole. My apologies.

[Unregistered]

Hey Mr. Troll,
Since this thread is about dangerous behavior by the president, I have an on-topic question for you.

If it's proven that Donald Trump raped an underage teen, would you still support him?

You asked the same question about supporting Trump when you were so sure he colluded with Russia. Remember that? How'd that turn out for ya? So now he is a convicted rapist? You clowns are the best! I love reading your post because it shows how pathetic the liberal mind is. Trump goes from Russain agent to rapist. What's next? Maybe he's the Hamburglar. Oh I know, check his safe, I bet Jimmy Hoffa is in there. You should be more concerned with your Liberal deity Billyboy Clinton. I hear he was quite the island traveler. When you have concrete proof like you did for collusion, asked me again. You're reaching Captain. I gotta say it sounds a little desperate.

[Unregistered]

You asked the same question about supporting Trump when you were so sure he colluded with Russia. Remember that? How'd that turn out for ya? So now he is a convicted rapist? You clowns are the best! I love reading your post because it shows how pathetic the liberal mind is. Trump goes from Russain agent to rapist. What's next? Maybe he's the Hamburglar. Oh I know, check his safe, I bet Jimmy Hoffa is in there. You should be more concerned with your Liberal deity Billyboy Clinton. I hear he was quite the island traveler. When you have concrete proof like you did for collusion, asked me again. You're reaching Captain. I gotta say it sounds a little desperate.

Try to keep up here. It is possible for Trump to be both a Russian asset and a rapist. No one said he's been convicted of rape, but he has been plausibly accused of it and has admitted committing sexual assault on tape. An admission from his own mouth recorded for posterity.

Someone can be an unwitting asset and not actively colluding. However, the Mueller report makes it quite clear the Trump campaign was indeed engaging in collusive activity with the Russians. Any idiot with a fifth grade reading comprehension level can see that with their own eyes if they bother to read the report. And that doesn't include the redacted bits that may very well reveal more.

So the question remains. What exactly would Trump have to do for him to lose your support? Because clearly mistreating women, welcoming foreign interference in our elections and doing nothing to prevent it from happening again in the future, making fun of the disabled, disparaging veterans, worshiping dictators while ******* off our democratic allies, using blatantly racist language, violating the emoluments clause, and asserting sitting congresswomen do not have the right to criticize him thereby failing to uphold the First Amendment isn't quite enough to do it for you. What is the line he would have to cross before you'd consider him unfit for the presidency? And why do you continue to avoid answering the question?

[Unregistered]

If you are going to use examples, then be accurate. Rand Paul was assaulted in a neighbor dispute, not by a liberal who disagreed with his politics.

Laurence Tribe's comment was a metaphor about impeachment. He was saying if you're going to initiate impeachment proceedings, make sure you can get a conviction in the senate.

Kathy Griffin's disgusting photo was soundly denounced by most people on the left and decried as being in poor taste. Liberals did not rush to her defense en masse. CNN fired her over it. https://www.lifezette.com/2017/05/ev...s-trump-photo/

As for, Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, are you talking about being heckled out of a Mexican restaurant? Despite Fox News' portrayal of the incident, it wasn't Democratic Socialists (but who cares if it was). The protestors were shaming her policies of supporting family separation, losing track of children, and the incarceration conditions of our fellow human beings. If you're okay with concentration camps, that's on your soul. Frankly, disturbing someone's dinner in a trendy restaurant doesn't quite rise to the level of violence for me.

The "spitting" on Bondi when protestors confronted her about her stance on immigration is a matter of some debate. https://www.tampabay.com/florida-pol...-rogers-movie/

Here's where you really stepped in an altered version of reality. My brother is a professor at VMI and my eldest is a cadet there. I know Lexington very well and happened to be there when the Red Hen incident happened. You are so full of s**t on this one. Stephanie was very civil when asking Sanders to leave. Sanders did so without incident. There was no subsequent mob. The community was actually surprised by the media reaction because it was such a calm event.

Susan Rice's son John David Rice-Cameron, dropped the charges against his assailant. According to Stanford’s Department of Public Safety, Rice-Cameron alleged “the female suspect shoved him in his chest with her hand during a verbal disagreement. There was no obvious physical injury to the victim and he declined to be evaluated by paramedics. ”

Peter Fonda's tweet horrified the left and he quickly apologized and took it down. Like Fonda and Griffin, Emalee was soundly criticized by her own side as going way too far with that. Where was the GOP horror and condemnation of images and tweets that *****ed Obama in effigy? https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...effigy-outrage

See, there's a difference here. The left will denounce horrific behavior. Look at how they handle politicians who mistreat women verses the way the GOP does. Democrats disavow and dismiss their own from office, while Republicans protect them - at the very least the one in the White House.

Democrats didn't applaud shooting a Republican politician. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...senate/530277/

https://time.com/4817859/steve-scali...-prayer-photo/

Are you capable of stating that violence is unacceptable regardless of which group of people is committing it against another group? Can you just say that Trump's incitement is wrong without deflecting to it's wrong when others do it. Of course it is, I've already said that. But still, you can't bring yourself to say that what Trump and his supporters are doing is dangerous and has the potential for real violence. Why is that I wonder.

GET YOUR FREE PASSES HERE: I really don't know where to begin. You want others to admit violence against others is wrong yet you call these liberal acts of violence and hate as misrepresentations. You don't "denounce" any of these acts. There's no reasoning with an idiot. You don't mention Maxine stoking the fire of hate speech by encouraging mobs to harass others. Then you go on to give free passes to the rest:

Shoot to kill is just a "metaphor"? Oh really, why not just say impeachment? Why drum up that narrative when some idiot just might act. What if Trump or a Fox News analyst said "shoot to kill" referring to voting Omar out of office. Complete snowflake meltdown! No denouncement from you. "Free pass"

Kathy Griffin poses with a severed head to POTUS. No denouncement from you. If a Fox News personality did that to Obama, you would have lost your mind. "Free pass"

Kirstjen Nielsen gets harassed with her family for her policies? Really? That makes it ok? Do you think maybe these morons are reacting to US congresswoman Maxine Watters plea for public harassment? You just regurgitated everything AOC said. Do you not have any thoughts on your own. Had that been an Obama cabinet member what happens? Yep, you guessed it. No denouncement from you. You actually encourage it. "Free pass"

Spitting on Bondi "debatable"? Bondi said she was but you don't believe her. Big surprise there! What is more troubling is that you shrug it off without acknowledging another mob responded to liberal pleas for public harassment. In this age of political unrest, anyone knows how dangerous this can be. Absolutely no denouncement from you. "free pass"

I read the same Washington Post article too about the Red Hen. We can agree to disagree on this one. Just one question for you. Why is it OK for someone not to serve a Trump cabinet member but liberals lose their minds over a business owner "choice" not to make a cake for someone? More hypocrisy! "free pass"

This one is my favorite. There were no signs of physical injury. Oh, so this where the liberals are now. Physical assault is OK now as long as there is no physical injury. Once again if Susan Rice's son was the head of the university young Liberal party and someone put their hands on them CNN would have run 24-hour news about escalating right-wing violence. Kind of like the same violence ANTIFA does on a regular basis. No denouncement from you. "free pass"

Are you capable of stating that violence is unacceptable regardless of which group of people is committing it against another group? Can you just say that Left-wing incitement is wrong without deflecting to it's wrong when others do it.

See, there is a difference here. You want to point out right-wing violence and the stoking of hate while completely ignoring left-wing pleas for open harassment against Trump officials. You denounce Trump comments as hateful incitement to violence yet give free passes to mobs that spit, shove (no signs of physical injury) and yell vulgarities at families peacefully trying to watch a play or eat at a local restaurant. You are a walking contradiction. You should be careful that you don't trip on those puppet strings. Come on Captian, I know you can be better than this!

[Unregistered]

GET YOUR FREE PASSES HERE: I really don't know where to begin. You want others to admit violence against others is wrong yet you call these liberal acts of violence and hate as misrepresentations. You don't "denounce" any of these acts. There's no reasoning with an idiot. You don't mention Maxine stoking the fire of hate speech by encouraging mobs to harass others. Then you go on to give free passes to the rest:

Shoot to kill is just a "metaphor"? Oh really, why not just say impeachment? Why drum up that narrative when some idiot just might act. What if Trump or a Fox News analyst said "shoot to kill" referring to voting Omar out of office. Complete snowflake meltdown! No denouncement from you. "Free pass"

Kathy Griffin poses with a severed head to POTUS. No denouncement from you. If a Fox News personality did that to Obama, you would have lost your mind. "Free pass"

Kirstjen Nielsen gets harassed with her family for her policies? Really? That makes it ok? Do you think maybe these morons are reacting to US congresswoman Maxine Watters plea for public harassment? You just regurgitated everything AOC said. Do you not have any thoughts on your own. Had that been an Obama cabinet member what happens? Yep, you guessed it. No denouncement from you. You actually encourage it. "Free pass"

Spitting on Bondi "debatable"? Bondi said she was but you don't believe her. Big surprise there! What is more troubling is that you shrug it off without acknowledging another mob responded to liberal pleas for public harassment. In this age of political unrest, anyone knows how dangerous this can be. Absolutely no denouncement from you. "free pass"

I read the same Washington Post article too about the Red Hen. We can agree to disagree on this one. Just one question for you. Why is it OK for someone not to serve a Trump cabinet member but liberals lose their minds over a business owner "choice" not to make a cake for someone? More hypocrisy! "free pass"

This one is my favorite. There were no signs of physical injury. Oh, so this where the liberals are now. Physical assault is OK now as long as there is no physical injury. Once again if Susan Rice's son was the head of the university young Liberal party and someone put their hands on them CNN would have run 24-hour news about escalating right-wing violence. Kind of like the same violence ANTIFA does on a regular basis. No denouncement from you. "free pass"

Are you capable of stating that violence is unacceptable regardless of which group of people is committing it against another group? Can you just say that Left-wing incitement is wrong without deflecting to it's wrong when others do it.

See, there is a difference here. You want to point out right-wing violence and the stoking of hate while completely ignoring left-wing pleas for open harassment against Trump officials. You denounce Trump comments as hateful incitement to violence yet give free passes to mobs that spit, shove (no signs of physical injury) and yell vulgarities at families peacefully trying to watch a play or eat at a local restaurant. You are a walking contradiction. You should be careful that you don't trip on those puppet strings. Come on Captian, I know you can be better than this!

So, your answer is nothing. There is nothing Trump could do that would lose your support. Got it.

[Unregistered]

Try to keep up here. It is possible for Trump to be both a Russian asset and a rapist. No one said he's been convicted of rape, but he has been plausibly accused of it and has admitted committing sexual assault on tape. An admission from his own mouth recorded for posterity.

Someone can be an unwitting asset and not actively colluding. However, the Mueller report makes it quite clear the Trump campaign was indeed engaging in collusive activity with the Russians. Any idiot with a fifth grade reading comprehension level can see that with their own eyes if they bother to read the report. And that doesn't include the redacted bits that may very well reveal more.

So the question remains. What exactly would Trump have to do for him to lose your support? Because clearly mistreating women, welcoming foreign interference in our elections and doing nothing to prevent it from happening again in the future, making fun of the disabled, disparaging veterans, worshiping dictators while ******* off our democratic allies, using blatantly racist language, violating the emoluments clause, and asserting sitting congresswomen do not have the right to criticize him thereby failing to uphold the First Amendment isn't quite enough to do it for you. What is the line he would have to cross before you'd consider him unfit for the presidency? And why do you continue to avoid answering the question?

I have never met anybody who lives in Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda land as much as you do. Trump should be, could be, would be...guess what he's not. There is no reason for me not to support the guy. Most everything you accuse him of is either not true, conjecture, or your opinion. He wasn't found guilty of collusion despite what a liberal TS poster thinks. He never "accepted" foreign interference (another opinion). Mistreats women? He employs more women than any other President and has a large support of women voters. I think they would be the authority on this. Worshipping dictators? Once again, liberal opinion. Disparaging veterans? Look at the facts. Look at what he has done for veterans vs Obama. These US congresswomen have called the POTUS every name imaginable. "Mother ****er", Nazi, white supremacists, and on and on. He defends himself. Boo Hoo if their feeling are hurt. They are in the big leagues now. He's grabbed a woman's ******. So have I. I would say you have too but now I'm not sure. My line is far different than a tree-hugging liberal. Any fifth-grader knows the difference between facts and opinion. There's your answer, Captian.

[Unregistered]

So, your answer is nothing. There is nothing Trump could do that would lose your support. Got it.

Come on Captin. Don't give up. We all know you've convinced yourself. The hard part is convincing others. Don't quit

[Unregistered]

I have never met anybody who lives in Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda land as much as you do. Trump should be, could be, would be...guess what he's not. There is no reason for me not to support the guy. Most everything you accuse him of is either not true, conjecture, or your opinion. He wasn't found guilty of collusion despite what a liberal TS poster thinks. He never "accepted" foreign interference (another opinion). Mistreats women? He employs more women than any other President and has a large support of women voters. I think they would be the authority on this. Worshipping dictators? Once again, liberal opinion. Disparaging veterans? Look at the facts. Look at what he has done for veterans vs Obama. These US congresswomen have called the POTUS every name imaginable. "Mother ****er", Nazi, white supremacists, and on and on. He defends himself. Boo Hoo if their feeling are hurt. They are in the big leagues now. He's grabbed a woman's ******. So have I. I would say you have too but now I'm not sure. My line is far different than a tree-hugging liberal. Any fifth-grader knows the difference between facts and opinion. There's your answer, Captian.

Sadly, we're all living in a land where people like you have an off the chart confirmation bias. You may know the difference between opinions and facts, but you will ignore facts that are inconvenient for you.

37 percent of the first 512 appointees in the Bill Clinton administration were women.
43 percent of Barack Obama’s appointments were women. Some departments, such as Health and Human Services, Education, Labor, and Housing and Urban Development had 50 percent or more female appointments under Obama.
27 percent of Trump administration hires through March of 2017 were female.

So no, Trump has not hired more women then any other president. But even though that data is available for you to check for accuracy, you won't. You'll just brush it aside as "fake news" because you don't want it to be true. The info is there for you, but you won't care since it violates your desired narrative.

Bottom line is you hate liberals so much, you'll let Trump get away with anything and believe anything just to "own" them. And avoid asking yourself tough questions about loyalty.

[Unregistered]

Sadly, we're all living in a land where people like you have an off the chart confirmation bias. You may know the difference between opinions and facts, but you will ignore facts that are inconvenient for you.

37 percent of the first 512 appointees in the Bill Clinton administration were women.
43 percent of Barack Obama’s appointments were women. Some departments, such as Health and Human Services, Education, Labor, and Housing and Urban Development had 50 percent or more female appointments under Obama.
27 percent of Trump administration hires through March of 2017 were female.

So no, Trump has not hired more women then any other president. But even though that data is available for you to check for accuracy, you won't. You'll just brush it aside as "fake news" because you don't want it to be true. The info is there for you, but you won't care since it violates your desired narrative.

Bottom line is you hate liberals so much, you'll let Trump get away with anything and believe anything just to "own" them. And avoid asking yourself tough questions about loyalty.

I don't hate Liberals and It's not about trying to own anybody. I hate when keyboard warriors post opinions disguised as facts. It's petty and just adds to the division of this country. You don't like Trump. Shocker! You believe he's a rapist, I don't. You believe he's a Russian agent, I don't. You believe he worships dictators, I don't. You believe he used Russia to get elected, I don't. You think the Mueller report has all these dark deep secrets, I don't. Who really gives a crap what you or I think? I just enjoy calling people out when they make unfounded, outlandish, unproven accusations. It's fun for me to listen to people bellyache about Trump especially when they have no clue what they're are talking about. For years you peddled that Russain agent crap and look where that got ya. You have to admit you looked like an idiot. If Trump is ever "convicted" of a crime, I will be the first to call him out. Until then I don't give a damn about your opinions of Trump. News flash, most people don't either.

[Unregistered]

Come on Captin. Don't give up. We all know you've convinced yourself. The hard part is convincing others. Don't quit

You know you're arguing with more than one person, right?

[Unregistered]

I have never met anybody who lives in Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda land as much as you do. Trump should be, could be, would be...guess what he's not. There is no reason for me not to support the guy. Most everything you accuse him of is either not true, conjecture, or your opinion. He wasn't found guilty of collusion despite what a liberal TS poster thinks. He never "accepted" foreign interference (another opinion). Mistreats women? He employs more women than any other President and has a large support of women voters. I think they would be the authority on this. Worshipping dictators? Once again, liberal opinion. Disparaging veterans? Look at the facts. Look at what he has done for veterans vs Obama. These US congresswomen have called the POTUS every name imaginable. "Mother ****er", Nazi, white supremacists, and on and on. He defends himself. Boo Hoo if their feeling are hurt. They are in the big leagues now. He's grabbed a woman's ******. So have I. I would say you have too but now I'm not sure. My line is far different than a tree-hugging liberal. Any fifth-grader knows the difference between facts and opinion. There's your answer, Captian.

You're going to look awfully foolish after Mueller testifies on Wednesday. I look forward to hearing how you explain away The Truth.

[Unregistered]

You're going to look awfully foolish after Mueller testifies on Wednesday. I look forward to hearing how you explain away The Truth.

I doubt Mueller will drop the bombshells the anti-Trump crowd is hoping for, but at least he'll put an end to this "no collusion, no obstruction, total exoneration" horsesh!t.

[Unregistered]

You're going to look awfully foolish after Mueller testifies on Wednesday. I look forward to hearing how you explain away The Truth.

We’ve been waiting to look foolish for years now. You’re the one who looked like an idiot prior the release of the investigation. You still haven’t explained why your Russian agent collusion theories never panned out. I’m still waiting for you to explain what happened to your slam dunk “Trump is going to prison” conspiracy. Just another clown show.

[Unregistered]

I have never met anybody who lives in Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda land as much as you do.

[...]

Any fifth-grader knows the difference between facts and opinion. There's your answer, Captian.

We will find out on Wednesday whether you're smarter than a fifth grader. BTW, my fifth grader knows how to spell Captain.