He's dangerous and people are going to get hurt.

[Unregistered]

Get used to it or go back to the ****hole you came from.President Trump is very popular & putting the country back on track.

The highest approval rating he's had in office has never broken 50%. In fact, his personal best was 46% back in April. So no, he's not "very popular." Just with white nationalists.

And when his idiotic trade war brings about a global recession within 9 months and the price of your consumer goods skyrocket, get back to us on how great he is at putting the country back on track. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/05/morg...is-coming.html

Jesus, you @$$holes are stupid. It is going to take generations to clean up his f****ing mess.

[Unregistered]

The highest approval rating he's had in office has never broken 50%. In fact, his personal best was 46% back in April. So no, he's not "very popular." Just with white nationalists.

And when his idiotic trade war brings about a global recession within 9 months and the price of your consumer goods skyrocket, get back to us on how great he is at putting the country back on track. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/05/morg...is-coming.html

Jesus, you @$$holes are stupid. It is going to take generations to clean up his f****ing mess.

Holy gosh dern, you libtards are stupid. June 2011 Obama 43% approval rating. June 2019 Trump 43% approval rating. He is as popular as Obama at the same time in their presidencies. If you had a clue about trade wars, you’d understand we’ve been kicked in the teeth and priced out of competition for decades. Even liberals concede that much. So Trump is gonna dig his heels in and not let these other foreign powers push us around anymore and you don’t like it. And Sherlock here seems to think a democratic socialist is the answer. Not sure if I should laugh or cry!

[Unregistered]

Holy gosh dern, you libtards are stupid. June 2011 Obama 43% approval rating. June 2019 Trump 43% approval rating. He is as popular as Obama at the same time in their presidencies. If you had a clue about trade wars, you’d understand we’ve been kicked in the teeth and priced out of competition for decades. Even liberals concede that much. So Trump is gonna dig his heels in and not let these other foreign powers push us around anymore and you don’t like it. And Sherlock here seems to think a democratic socialist is the answer. Not sure if I should laugh or cry!

1. Obama's lowest approval rating was 38%. Trump's was 35%.
2. Obama's highest approval rating was 69%. Trump's was 46%.

If you know anything about math, you'll be able to grasp that never having an approval rating above 50% completely destroys your "very popular" claim. But kudos to you for bringing Obama into a discussion about Trump when the original conversation had absolutely nothing to do with him. Hillary's emails in 3, 2, ...

If you knew anything about trade wars (crack open a history book once in awhile), you'd know they never end well and we will be paying the price. While you're at it, take a gander at the market performance today. Then go ask a grown up to explain it to you.

[Unregistered]

1. Obama's lowest approval rating was 38%. Trump's was 35%.
2. Obama's highest approval rating was 69%. Trump's was 46%.

If you know anything about math, you'll be able to grasp that never having an approval rating above 50% completely destroys your "very popular" claim. But kudos to you for bringing Obama into a discussion about Trump when the original conversation had absolutely nothing to do with him. Hillary's emails in 3, 2, ...

If you knew anything about trade wars (crack open a history book once in awhile), you'd know they never end well and we will be paying the price. While you're at it, take a gander at the market performance today. Then go ask a grown up to explain it to you.

Trump been in office 2.5 years. Obama had 8. Nice try. Plus, Obama didnt have a leftist mainstream media attempting to undermine him with a propaganda coup-d'etat.

But even if Trump never breaks 50% it only proves that either Conservatives are more open-minded and accommodating than the hateful left, or we dont like talking to pollsters.
Keep in mind the media had Trump at well under 50% prior to his election with roughly 50% of the vote.

[Unregistered]

Not saying Trump should receive 100% of the blame, but when the perpetrators are full of divisive hate-filled rhetoric you have to wonder if the divisive hate-filled rhetoric from the president contributed somehow. Remember the MAGA bomber's van decorated as a shrine to Trump?

And yes, there is divisive hate-filed rhetoric on the left too. And violence that's perhaps inspired by it. That's just as wrong. It's all a symptom of the discord that Trump and his Russian handlers so desperately want. They have an army of trolls stirring up that discord online every day.

You know, like you're doing.

Stating that illegal aliens are invading the country is not hate-filled. Its factual. They are breaking the law. Come here legally and it is a different story, you are welcomed.

Stating that it would be economically preferable to take European immigrants over Latin American because they are more educated is not hate-filled. Its factual. They will contribute more meaningfully to the future technology based economy, and virtually every other developed nation on earth has clear preferences for educated immigrants over uneducated. Even with a college degree you couldnt immigrate to (socialist) New Zealand, Australia or Europe unless you were loaded.

Stating that many among those coming across the border are rapists and criminals is not hate-filled. Its factual. They are. Most Mexican immigrants are law abiding and good people, and you can twist statistics anyway you want, but many of those coming across are connected with the drug cartels and urban gangs, which kill FAR more each year than the occasional white supremacist does, and for which the border is a revolving door of (American) injustice.

Im white, my wife is Mexican and even she would tell you these things are true. She has more common sense than any of you liberals here. But then again, she did not grow up in an environment like we do here where there is a constant drum beat of social justice Marxism coming from our "unbiased" and "objective" media. You liberals are just so brainwashed you cant even see how you are being used and whipped up by them.

[Unregistered]

Stating that illegal aliens are invading the country is not hate-filled. Its factual. They are breaking the law. Come here legally and it is a different story, you are welcomed.

Stating that it would be economically preferable to take European immigrants over Latin American because they are more educated is not hate-filled. Its factual. They will contribute more meaningfully to the future technology based economy, and virtually every other developed nation on earth has clear preferences for educated immigrants over uneducated. Even with a college degree you couldnt immigrate to (socialist) New Zealand, Australia or Europe unless you were loaded.

Stating that many among those coming across the border are rapists and criminals is not hate-filled. Its factual. They are. Most Mexican immigrants are law abiding and good people, and you can twist statistics anyway you want, but many of those coming across are connected with the drug cartels and urban gangs, which kill FAR more each year than the occasional white supremacist does, and for which the border is a revolving door of (American) injustice.

Im white, my wife is Mexican and even she would tell you these things are true. She has more common sense than any of you liberals here. But then again, she did not grow up in an environment like we do here where there is a constant drum beat of social justice Marxism coming from our "unbiased" and "objective" media. You liberals are just so brainwashed you cant even see how you are being used and whipped up by them.

Well said. Don’t take the hypocrite bait. This tool wouldn’t want MS13 on their street anymore than you or I. Oh, I know that’s racist right. Comparing illegals to MS13. What the hell do u think would happen with open boarders? Liberals want to fundamentally change America until it shows up on their doorstep. Glass houses don’t offer the same protection as big walls and guns. You know the same things that protect the Pelosi compound. Liberals love ideology not reality. Why do u think they spank off to Socialism so much? Because somebody else told them it was awesome. That’s a lot of sheep.

[Unregistered]

Trump been in office 2.5 years. Obama had 8. Nice try. Plus, Obama didnt have a leftist mainstream media attempting to undermine him with a propaganda coup-d'etat.

But even if Trump never breaks 50% it only proves that either Conservatives are more open-minded and accommodating than the hateful left, or we dont like talking to pollsters.
Keep in mind the media had Trump at well under 50% prior to his election with roughly 50% of the vote.

Bottom line, less than 50% approval does not mean he's "very popular." You want facts? It's factual. He's not very popular. Too bad if you find it offensive to be in a minority on this, but you are.

Squirming around ridiculous excuses like conservatives are more open-minded (HAH!!!! That's one thing they claim to hate about liberals, so kudos to you for an outrageously funny example of cognitive dissonance) and don't like talking to pollsters (give us a break already) will not make the reality go away. Other than his debased base, he's not well liked. He's just not.

And his popularity will never go up, only down. In a decade, we'll be hard pressed to find someone who'll admit to voting for him. He's toxic in so many ways.

[Unregistered]

Bottom line, less than 50% approval does not mean he's "very popular." You want facts? It's factual. He's not very popular. Too bad if you find it offensive to be in a minority on this, but you are.

Squirming around ridiculous excuses like conservatives are more open-minded (HAH!!!! That's one thing they claim to hate about liberals, so kudos to you for an outrageously funny example of cognitive dissonance) and don't like talking to pollsters (give us a break already) will not make the reality go away. Other than his debased base, he's not well liked. He's just not.

And his popularity will never go up, only down. In a decade, we'll be hard pressed to find someone who'll admit to voting for him. He's toxic in so many ways.

Holy man, the Captain is angry today! Liberals don't like Trump. Wow, there's a shocker. Thanks for stating the obvious.

[Unregistered]

Holy man, the Captain is angry today! Liberals don't like Trump. Wow, there's a shocker. Thanks for stating the obvious.

I'm curious. Why do you call posters Captain? What's the backstory to that. I don't get it.

[Unregistered]

Bottom line, less than 50% approval does not mean he's "very popular." You want facts? It's factual. He's not very popular. Too bad if you find it offensive to be in a minority on this, but you are.

Squirming around ridiculous excuses like conservatives are more open-minded (HAH!!!! That's one thing they claim to hate about liberals, so kudos to you for an outrageously funny example of cognitive dissonance) and don't like talking to pollsters (give us a break already) will not make the reality go away. Other than his debased base, he's not well liked. He's just not.

And his popularity will never go up, only down. In a decade, we'll be hard pressed to find someone who'll admit to voting for him. He's toxic in so many ways.

I agree on your last point. I do think the media tends to understate his popularity. But you are also correct it is not more than 50%. There are many americans that do not approve of trump yet are not enthusiastic about the slate of democratic candidates and are weighing the "lesser evil." I think that's where the election will be decided. the president will make points with this swing electorate by calling his opponent a socialist (if his opponent is sanders or warren). I do not think attacking kamala as "sleeping her way to the top" will be very useful. I think attacks against biden as old and out of touch may gain some traction, unless he proves everyone wrong. politics is about public perceptions, something the democrats don't seem to understand very well.

while i agree this is a dangerous president for some many different reasons, and I also agree he is not competent for the office of president, he is politically savvy and his savvy is underestimated by his opponents.

[Unregistered]

Bottom line, less than 50% approval does not mean he's "very popular." You want facts? It's factual. He's not very popular. Too bad if you find it offensive to be in a minority on this, but you are.

Squirming around ridiculous excuses like conservatives are more open-minded (HAH!!!! That's one thing they claim to hate about liberals, so kudos to you for an outrageously funny example of cognitive dissonance) and don't like talking to pollsters (give us a break already) will not make the reality go away. Other than his debased base, he's not well liked. He's just not.

And his popularity will never go up, only down. In a decade, we'll be hard pressed to find someone who'll admit to voting for him. He's toxic in so many ways.

while everyone is debating gun control, world financial markets are not exactly humming along. 50/50 risk of recession over the next year. fed will not be cutting rates aggressively. this could hugely impact 2020 election.

[Unregistered]

I'm curious. Why do you call posters Captain? What's the backstory to that. I don't get it.

He uses the term Captain Collusion (he finally learned how to spell Captain) for posters who point out documented evidence of ties between Russia and the Trump campaign. He still denies that evidence exists, despite the proof in the Mueller report which he swore he would accept.

And he still doesn't understand that there are multiple people here calling out his BS, so he acts as if we are all the same person, LOL.

[Unregistered]

He uses the term Captain Collusion (he finally learned how to spell Captain) for posters who point out documented evidence of ties between Russia and the Trump campaign. He still denies that evidence exists, despite the proof in the Mueller report which he swore he would accept.

And he still doesn't understand that there are multiple people here calling out his BS, so he acts as if we are all the same person, LOL.

Thanks!

Yeah, I'm baffled by the pivot from "I'll believe it if it's in Mueller's report." to "The Mueller report doesn't prove anything." Even if they choose to ignore the numerous instances of obstruction of justice and dismiss the evidence of Trump's campaign willfully accepting help from the Russians (and Trump on camera saying he'd do it again), surely they can grasp that the Russians absolutely did interfere in the election on an alarming scale with or without collusion with Americans. Even Republicans in public office aren't disputing that point anymore.

[Unregistered]

Thanks!

Yeah, I'm baffled by the pivot from "I'll believe it if it's in Mueller's report." to "The Mueller report doesn't prove anything." Even if they choose to ignore the numerous instances of obstruction of justice and dismiss the evidence of Trump's campaign willfully accepting help from the Russians (and Trump on camera saying he'd do it again), surely they can grasp that the Russians absolutely did interfere in the election on an alarming scale with or without collusion with Americans. Even Republicans in public office aren't disputing that point anymore.

the mueller investigation was entirely justified and did a good job in uncovering proof of russian interference. we need to understand and stop it in the future. it is a direct attack on america. hard to believe all the patriotic republicans dont understand this. did CNN engage in wishful thinking about trump and/ his family being involved directly? oh yes. but dont take your eye off the ball. the main issue is russian interference and how to stop it, nor what CNN writes. our president should have a duty to support mueller's investigation, as his goals are much more important to national security than an "invasion" of central american refugees.

[Unregistered]

I agree on your last point. I do think the media tends to understate his popularity. But you are also correct it is not more than 50%. There are many americans that do not approve of trump yet are not enthusiastic about the slate of democratic candidates and are weighing the "lesser evil." I think that's where the election will be decided. the president will make points with this swing electorate by calling his opponent a socialist (if his opponent is sanders or warren). I do not think attacking kamala as "sleeping her way to the top" will be very useful. I think attacks against biden as old and out of touch may gain some traction, unless he proves everyone wrong. politics is about public perceptions, something the democrats don't seem to understand very well.

while i agree this is a dangerous president for some many different reasons, and I also agree he is not competent for the office of president, he is politically savvy and his savvy is underestimated by his opponents.

Whoever the GOP nominee is (I'm not 100% convinced Trump will be mentally and physically able to complete the campaign - he's clearly got severe neurological impairment at a rapidly progressing rate that will become increasingly harder to disguise), that individual will go after any Democratic nominee as a socialist. The GOP is 100% in lock step on that. Won't matter if it's a centrist candidate, they'll still paint the person as just this side of Trotsky.

If Trump, it would be hard to go after Biden on age. Yes, he's 3.5 years younger than Biden but it would call too much attention to his condition. And if Trump, I don't think he has the impulse control to refrain from blatant misogynist attacks this go round. If the Democrats nominate a female candidate, I expect a lot of gender-related ugliness. It won't be in dog whistles this time, it will be a bullhorn.