Breaking News: Fox News reporting Trump colluded with Russia

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2311172]If true it's sad that Ohio places a lot more soccer players into college than Florida does

Ohio, the middle melting pot of American genes.

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2311173]You obviously don't know how Special Prosecutors work. Mueller's team is airtight. No leaks. This is a man who operates on his own schedule, relying on facts and logic, not the daily news cycle. Nobody knows what he has.

How delicious and ironic that a man who's the polar opposite of Donald Trump might be the one to take him down. Unfortunately for Trump, facts usually triumph over bullsh!t in the American legal system

Wait, what?

http://wjla.com/news/nation-world/25...they-may-cause

https://www.washingtonpost.com/ampht...83d_story.html

https://nypost.com/2017/11/06/robert...k-problem/amp/

https://www.newsweek.com/mueller-lea...i-755748?amp=1

http://www.latimes.com/la-ol-enter-t...htmlstory.html

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/0...tions-and-why/

No leaks huh? I could call u a complete dumbass but I think you took care of that for me. Just more unfounded libtard fake rhetoric. Is that wolf cry I hear?

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2311202]

You obviously don't know how Special Prosecutors work. Mueller's team is airtight. No leaks. This is a man who operates on his own schedule, relying on facts and logic, not the daily news cycle. Nobody knows what he has.

How delicious and ironic that a man who's the polar opposite of Donald Trump might be the one to take him down. Unfortunately for Trump, facts usually triumph over bullsh!t in the American legal system

Wait, what?

http://wjla.com/news/nation-world/25...they-may-cause

https://www.washingtonpost.com/ampht...83d_story.html

https://nypost.com/2017/11/06/robert...k-problem/amp/

https://www.newsweek.com/mueller-lea...i-755748?amp=1

http://www.latimes.com/la-ol-enter-t...htmlstory.html

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/0...tions-and-why/

No leaks huh? I could call u a complete dumbass but I think you took care of that for me. Just more unfounded libtard fake rhetoric. Is that wolf cry I hear?

Russian paid troll, time to go night night.

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2311205]

Russian paid troll, time to go night night.

Come on man, no reply? I thought you said Mueller was airtight. I didn't know the New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, and the rest were paid Russian trolls. They reported it not me. You get called out for you BS and you resort to Russian troll? That's why you guys keep losing. No substance, no original thoughts, no ideas, and no solutions. Signed Russian troll

[Unregistered]

Come on man, no reply? I thought you said Mueller was airtight. I didn't know the New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, and the rest were paid Russian trolls. They reported it not me. You get called out for you BS and you resort to Russian troll? That's why you guys keep losing. No substance, no original thoughts, no ideas, and no solutions. Signed Russian troll

Most of these so called "leaks" are coming from Trump's people not Mueller's. They continue to speculate based on who get's subpoenaed, what information is requested, etc. And that speculation is designed to lie and misinform to suit Trump's case.

Engage your brain and read past the headline, please. Can you link to an article that sources Robert Mueller or a member of his team as the source of any leak? I didn't think so.

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2311205]

Russian paid troll, time to go night night.

It's only midnight in Moscow. The troll night shift just took over.

[Unregistered]

E

Most of these so called "leaks" are coming from Trump's people not Mueller's. They continue to speculate based on who get's subpoenaed, what information is requested, etc. And that speculation is designed to lie and misinform to suit Trump's case.

Engage your brain and read past the headline, please. Can you link to an article that sources Robert Mueller or a member of his team as the source of any leak? I didn't think so.

You obviously didn’t read the New York Post article. If you had, you would have read the following: Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, says he specifically warned Mueller about “the importance of cutting out the leaks.”
Indeed, he added on “Fox News Sunday,” “it’s kind of ironic that the people charged with investigating the law and the violations of the law would violate the law.”

“Actually, it’s more than ironic. It raises serious questions about the integrity and impartiality of the whole investigation.”e

“Mueller, after all, has been criticized for staffing his probe overwhelmingly with prosecutors who are Democratic contributors.”

[Unregistered]

You obviously didn’t read the New York Post article. If you had, you would have read the following: Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, says he specifically warned Mueller about “the importance of cutting out the leaks.”
Indeed, he added on “Fox News Sunday,” “it’s kind of ironic that the people charged with investigating the law and the violations of the law would violate the law.”

“Actually, it’s more than ironic. It raises serious questions about the integrity and impartiality of the whole investigation.”e

“Mueller, after all, has been criticized for staffing his probe overwhelmingly with prosecutors who are Democratic contributors.”

You obviously didn’t read your own link. It also says, "True, the leaks may not necessarily have come from Mueller’s office". The source is described as being "someone familiar with the investigation"

An unfounded accusation of leaks by a pro-Trump shill doesn't count as proof. You should stop taking propaganda lessons from a pathological liar.

And since you brought up the Post article, I guess you admit the other leak accusations were bullsh!t. You'd be right, because they are.

[Unregistered]

You obviously didn’t read your own link. It also says, "True, the leaks may not necessarily have come from Mueller’s office". The source is described as being "someone familiar with the investigation"

An unfounded accusation of leaks by a pro-Trump shill doesn't count as proof. You should stop taking propaganda lessons from a pathological liar.

And since you brought up the Post article, I guess you admit the other leak accusations were bullsh!t. You'd be right, because they are.

Come on man, the dude was warned by the House Oversight Committee to stop the leaks. Obviously they aren’t talking about Trump leaking. How convenient that you wanna breeze over that part and the part questioning the integrity of the investigation. Not to mention it was just released yesterday that basis for the investigation was indeed related to the fake dossier paid for by the Clinton Campaign. That’s right the DOJ confirmed it was fake and funded by Hillary. Wait and see, this may not be the slam dunk you’re hoping for. So much shady shït going on the Dem side too!

[Unregistered]

Come on man, the dude was warned by the House Oversight Committee to stop the leaks. Obviously they aren’t talking about Trump leaking. How convenient that you wanna breeze over that part and the part questioning the integrity of the investigation. Not to mention it was just released yesterday that basis for the investigation was indeed related to the fake dossier paid for by the Clinton Campaign. That’s right the DOJ confirmed it was fake and funded by Hillary. Wait and see, this may not be the slam dunk you’re hoping for. So much shady shït going on the Dem side too!

Dude, you should turn off Trump's twitter feed and Fox News and turn on your brain. Since when do accusations without evidence count as proof, especially when they come from a pro-Trump mouthpiece like Trey Gowdy? If I question your integrity and accuse you of selling drugs can you be arrested and convicted based on that?

Here's the deal: If the leaks originated with Mueller's office or the grand jury, that would be a criminal violation. Trump's people must not be as smart as you, or they would have charged Mueller with that crime already. So, since you are so certain of these Mueller leaks, you should gather your evidence and file a lawsuit immediately. You will be the hero of the Trump organization and the alt-right.

Let us know how that goes, OK?

[Unregistered]

Manafort got a delay on his trial, but only for a week. Five or six witnesses were given immunity; two from Manafort's accounting firm, two from the bank he defrauded for a massive loan, promising a bank exec a high level government position. That won't please Trump at all. Expect more 6am tweetstorms to come as info starts coming out of the trial

[Unregistered]

Expect more 6am tweetstorms to come as info starts coming out of the trial

Don't you mean tweetstorms in ALL CAPS?

NEVER, EVER THREATEN MY BITCH BOY PAUL MANAFORT AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW COURT OFFICERS THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. YOU WILL NEVER WORK IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AGAIN! I AM NOT A PERSON THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR INTIMIDATION OF MY BITCHBOYS IN AN ATTEMPT TO UNCOVER MY COVERUPS! BE CAUTIOUS!

[Unregistered]

You obviously didn’t read the New York Post article. If you had, you would have read the following: Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, says he specifically warned Mueller about “the importance of cutting out the leaks.”
Indeed, he added on “Fox News Sunday,” “it’s kind of ironic that the people charged with investigating the law and the violations of the law would violate the law.”

“Actually, it’s more than ironic. It raises serious questions about the integrity and impartiality of the whole investigation.”e

“Mueller, after all, has been criticized for staffing his probe overwhelmingly with prosecutors who are Democratic contributors.”

The New York Post & Fox News Sunday - two benchmarks of journalistic integrity <insert rolleyes emoticon here>

[Unregistered]

Don't you mean tweetstorms in ALL CAPS?

NEVER, EVER THREATEN MY BITCH BOY PAUL MANAFORT AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW COURT OFFICERS THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. YOU WILL NEVER WORK IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AGAIN! I AM NOT A PERSON THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR INTIMIDATION OF MY BITCHBOYS IN AN ATTEMPT TO UNCOVER MY COVERUPS! BE CAUTIOUS!

All caps means you're dead serious in your bullying. Lower case letters are for puzzies.

[Unregistered]

Don't you mean tweetstorms in ALL CAPS?

NEVER, EVER THREATEN MY BITCH BOY PAUL MANAFORT AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW COURT OFFICERS THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. YOU WILL NEVER WORK IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AGAIN! I AM NOT A PERSON THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR INTIMIDATION OF MY BITCHBOYS IN AN ATTEMPT TO UNCOVER MY COVERUPS! BE CAUTIOUS!

Clear and evident pattern. Iran, if you threaten America again you will suffer like you've never suffered before. It worked with N Korea to get a meeting.