Trump/DeSantis Ticket would be like if ECNL/GA merged

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373430][QUOTE=Guest;n4373409][QUOTE=Guest;n4373398]

I read every bit of all 5 pieces you linked. Did YOU actually read them, or did you just paste the top links after a sloppy brainless google search? I'm guessing the latter, because they don't help your case.

The censortrack piece attempted to throw shade on factcheck.org. Censortrack was founded by a man who served a stint in the Patrick Buchanan campaign (yes the well-known nazi sympathizer) with the purpose of attacking left-wing media.
Here's an example of their "proof" that factcheck is biased": "FactCheck focuses far more on President Donald Trump than other politicians" Um, maybe because he was the president and kept doing sketchy things? Sorry, I'm going to trust factcheck.org, especially when multiple other outlets reported the same thing.

The archive.org link went to a description of the presidential records act. No argument with that. How exactly does that back up anything you said?

I'm guessing you didn't actually read the jimbovard.com article because it says. "The Presidential Records act is critical to our democracy, in which the government is held accountable by the people", followed by a weak argument that it's not always enforced. None of which excuses what trump did.

The trending politics piece is a right-wing shoot-the-messenger hack job. It argues the because the DOJ official that met with the trump team before the raid previously worked for Robert Mueller, that somehow the raid was unjustified. Huh? Your fourth grade debate coach would have given that a D-minus

The last link asks the question, "Is this proof the Mar-a-Lago raid was a fishing expedition?" You must have not read past the headline, because the clear answer in NO. The FBI found exactly what they were looking for - how exactly is that a fishing expedition?

Next time don't be such a lazy POS and make sure your links actually say what you claim.

This is the second time I've asked you to back up your BS and the second time you've failed. One would think a person claiming to have two advanced degrees would engage some critical thinking and begin to wonder if they're being lied to.




Fact Check.org fake and fraudulent website https://stateofthenation.co/?p=67947

Fishing expedition
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2...nt-fishing-ex/

As I said, your reading comprehension is atrocious. You read but can’t absorb and when you see something in ink that you disagree with it gets deemed a right wing hack job.

If you think a raid on a presidents home is okay, just wait until congress flips and they go after Obama, Pelosi, Biden and his crack head son because if the only thing they can find on Trump after every single government agency, MSM and the democrats investigating him for 6 years is some documents which may or may not been classified, I can’t wait to what they uncover on the Biden’s!
Look up Crossfire Hurricane & Whitner Kidnap plot and tell me if you think what was done justified.

https://nypost.com/2022/08/18/inside...he-trump-raid/
https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-f...eard-mar-lago/

You are clearly too stupid to understand what is going on.
You vote for someone that if I asked you off the cuff what he has done to improve your life after 50 years in government, you won’t be able to answer. Instead you are just like Sam Harris a prominent Democrat Podcaster who said and I quote” Hunter Biden literally could have had the corpses of dead children in his basement. I would not have cared and still voted for senile Biden because Trump bad. You people are disgusting and make me sick. I’m so glad you will lose big in November and we can be done with the party once and for all!

[Guest]

Fact Check.org fake and fraudulent website https://stateofthenation.co/?p=67947

Fishing expedition
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2...nt-fishing-ex/

As I said, your reading comprehension is atrocious. You read but can’t absorb and when you see something in ink that you disagree with it gets deemed a right wing hack job.

If you think a raid on a presidents home is okay, just wait until congress flips and they go after Obama, Pelosi, Biden and his crack head son because if the only thing they can find on Trump after every single government agency, MSM and the democrats investigating him for 6 years is some documents which may or may not been classified, I can’t wait to what they uncover on the Biden’s!
Look up Crossfire Hurricane & Whitner Kidnap plot and tell me if you think what was done justified.

https://nypost.com/2022/08/18/inside...he-trump-raid/
https://www.westernjournal.com/fbi-f...eard-mar-lago/

You are clearly too stupid to understand what is going on.
You vote for someone that if I asked you off the cuff what he has done to improve your life after 50 years in government, you won’t be able to answer. Instead you are just like Sam Harris a prominent Democrat Podcaster who said and I quote” Hunter Biden literally could have had the corpses of dead children in his basement. I would not have cared and still voted for senile Biden because Trump bad. You people are disgusting and make me sick. I’m so glad you will lose big in November and we can be done with the party once and for all!

The only thing you've proven is how far below the bottom of the barrel you have to reach in order to scrape up references that support your twisted views.

Since The Truth is devastating to right-wing propaganda, they've waged a well-documented war against fact-checking sites. In support of that cause, you've chosen stateofhtenation.com in an attempt to disparage fact-checking site factcheck.com, who correctly points out that the president doesn't have the authority to issue standing orders to declassify. Here's the Media Bias report on stateofthenation.com:

"We rate State of the Nation (SOTN) extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience and the use of poor sources, a complete lack of transparency, and false claims. A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis."

I could do the same for your other junk sources, but you get the idea.

You continue to pledge full support for traitorous acts by an ex-president that willfully endangered U.S. national security. You offer no explanation for those acts, and instead choose to insult, deflect, and spew whataboutisms.

Why did trump take those classified docs to Mar-a-Lago, what did he intend to do with them, and why did he have his lawyers lie about having returned them?

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373561]

The only thing you've proven is how far below the bottom of the barrel you have to reach in order to scrape up references that support your twisted views.

Since The Truth is devastating to right-wing propaganda, they've waged a well-documented war against fact-checking sites. In support of that cause, you've chosen stateofhtenation.com in an attempt to disparage fact-checking site factcheck.com, who correctly points out that the president doesn't have the authority to issue standing orders to declassify. Here's the Media Bias report on stateofthenation.com:

"We rate State of the Nation (SOTN) extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience and the use of poor sources, a complete lack of transparency, and false claims. A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis."

I could do the same for your other junk sources, but you get the idea.

You continue to pledge full support for traitorous acts by an ex-president that willfully endangered U.S. national security. You offer no explanation for those acts, and instead choose to insult, deflect, and spew whataboutisms.

Why did trump take those classified docs to Mar-a-Lago, what did he intend to do with them, and why did he have his lawyers lie about having returned them?


Nobody believes your BS, only other idiot democrats like yourself!
READ scum!!
fishing expedition


http://davidbrivkin.com/trump-cant-b...ver-documents/

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373784]

The only thing you've proven is how far below the bottom of the barrel you have to reach in order to scrape up references that support your twisted views.

Since The Truth is devastating to right-wing propaganda, they've waged a well-documented war against fact-checking sites. In support of that cause, you've chosen stateofhtenation.com in an attempt to disparage fact-checking site factcheck.com, who correctly points out that the president doesn't have the authority to issue standing orders to declassify. Here's the Media Bias report on stateofthenation.com:

"We rate State of the Nation (SOTN) extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience and the use of poor sources, a complete lack of transparency, and false claims. A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis."

I could do the same for your other junk sources, but you get the idea.

You continue to pledge full support for traitorous acts by an ex-president that willfully endangered U.S. national security. You offer no explanation for those acts, and instead choose to insult, deflect, and spew whataboutisms.

Why did trump take those classified docs to Mar-a-Lago, what did he intend to do with them, and why did he have his lawyers lie about having returned them?


Nobody believes your BS, only other idiot democrats like yourself!
READ scum!!
fishing expedition


http://davidbrivkin.com/trump-cant-b...ver-documents/

http://davidbrivkin.com/the-trump-wa...-legal-basis/P