Women players are ruining the beautiful game

[Unregistered]

I have a proposal. Guaranteed world peach in just two generations.
UNIVERSAL MALE CASTRATION AT BIRTH.

Seriously, think about. No war was ever started by a woman or a eunuch. Science has advanced to a point where we do not need the male gender anymore.

I know the fellas are a attached (literally) to their ping-pongs, but they will get over. Small price to pay for World Peace.

Look, Butch, we get it you have no need for or interest in men. But world peach, er, peach, with all women? Have you ever been to school, the workplace, or any place with two or more women (other than trolling for snatch that is) gathered? Yeah, real peaceful--you know, cause women never argue and fight.

For someone who spend so much time trying to hook up with them you sure don't know much about women. You should go ask some men to help educate you about dealing with women.

[Unregistered]

I dare you to tell me there isn't more entertainment in this 1 minute than the most exciting WCC game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KPzX8RXems

That turtle rocks! It's fast, it bites, I'd name it Luis Suarez. Loved it!

But seriously, is your point that women aren't "suited" for soccer or that you find women's soccer boring? Because, God Bless America, women have a right to play, you have a right to call it boring, and you and I have the right to spout our BS on this board.

Now, I dare you to watch/read this story, not from the distant bygone past, but from last week...
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/ir...soccer-n372091

Where should we draw the line on what women can do?

[Unregistered]

Your right I prefer to watch idiots go out on the field and flop around for fake fouls. Women have brought respect to the game to make up for the ignorance the men have made it.

really--Abbey and the entire Brazilian WNT ..... go a-flopping like fish out of water. do you actually pay attention to the games or is it just a buffet of buzz cuts and thick thighs that you dream of scissoring with?

[Unregistered]

really--Abbey and the entire Brazilian WNT ..... go a-flopping like fish out of water. do you actually pay attention to the games or is it just a buffet of buzz cuts and thick thighs that you dream of scissoring with?

This is what we do at every practice..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl2F6P8bw9w

[Unregistered]

Your right I prefer to watch idiots go out on the field and flop around for fake fouls. Women have brought respect to the game to make up for the ignorance the men have made it.

Think the male troll made this for it is a pretty stupid comment to make.

[Unregistered]

http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs29/i/20..._louisemcc.jpg

[img]http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://a1.s6img.com/cdn/0024/p/9747507_11860675_lz.jpg&imgrefurl=http://society6.com/product/cute-pink-pig-oink_print&h=600&w=600&tbnid=c9MFrT-btK_8SM:&zoom=1&docid=MT6aeQ0K3-l4pM&hl=en&ei=9CWAVbrzCYGusQX2g4GgBw&tbm=isch&clie nt=safari&ved=0CE4QMygmMCZqFQoTCLq9g5mqlMYCFQFXrAo d9kEAdA

[Unregistered]

http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs29/i/20..._louisemcc.jpg

http://th05.deviantart.net/fs71/200H...89-d4qqz2s.jpg

[Unregistered]

Much of what is being said on this thread - and the other Misogynist ant-women threads on this site are NOT covered by free speech.

The NTAI Act of 1993 defined "hate-speech" as anything speech designed to create feelings of inferiority or subjugation on a protected class, which includes gender.

Much of the criticisms of women soccer being posted on this thread and others are not serious critique of the game, but rather purely an attempt to incite people and to create feelings of inferiority. If any of you knew anything about 1st Amendment Law, you would know that this thread is full of examples that are clearly not protected by free speech. There are text book examples of gender related hate-speech on this thread, and other threads on this side.

If the moderators of this site had any sense, with would know that these anti-women threads are crossing the line into hate-speech, and they would be removed. But there are no moderators here, and misogyny is still alive and well in America.

[Unregistered]

Much of what is being said on this thread - and the other Misogynist ant-women threads on this site are NOT covered by free speech.

The NTAI Act of 1993 defined "hate-speech" as anything speech designed to create feelings of inferiority or subjugation on a protected class, which includes gender.

Much of the criticisms of women soccer being posted on this thread and others are not serious critique of the game, but rather purely an attempt to incite people and to create feelings of inferiority. If any of you knew anything about 1st Amendment Law, you would know that this thread is full of examples that are clearly not protected by free speech. There are text book examples of gender related hate-speech on this thread, and other threads on this side.

If the moderators of this site had any sense, with would know that these anti-women threads are crossing the line into hate-speech, and they would be removed. But there are no moderators here, and misogyny is still alive and well in America.

If you are the same person with no knowledge of history who is now displaying her lack of First Amendment jurisprudence, would you PLEASE know what you're talking about before posting (or PLEASE go do some reading!!!). You are just flat out wrong on both topics.

You are a living breathing example of Pope's famous line "A little learning is a dangerous thing;" Do yourself an enormous favor and spend less time butchering subjects of TS and spending more time at the library.

[Unregistered]

Free Speech:

1. I love women's soccer.
2. I hate women's soccer.
3. I am for.....
4. I am against...

Being a hateful jerk who has issues is the person or persons posting the garbage thinking it is funny. I do not like women's soccer but am happy that girls can play the sport and support them. This thread should be shut down for the jerk or jerks that are polluting the website with hate.

[Unregistered]

Much of what is being said on this thread - and the other Misogynist ant-women threads on this site are NOT covered by free speech.

The NTAI Act of 1993 defined "hate-speech" as anything speech designed to create feelings of inferiority or subjugation on a protected class, which includes gender.

Much of the criticisms of women soccer being posted on this thread and others are not serious critique of the game, but rather purely an attempt to incite people and to create feelings of inferiority. If any of you knew anything about 1st Amendment Law, you would know that this thread is full of examples that are clearly not protected by free speech. There are text book examples of gender related hate-speech on this thread, and other threads on this side.

If the moderators of this site had any sense, with would know that these anti-women threads are crossing the line into hate-speech, and they would be removed. But there are no moderators here, and misogyny is still alive and well in America.

Here let me help you get started in your education of First Amendment law. BTW--when statues, federal or state, conflict with the U.S. Constitution including the Amendments the latter takes primacy. And you hate all men. Here I am giving you a free basic legal education. Your welcome.


Which types of speech are not protected by the First Amendment?
Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (includes libel, slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

[Unregistered]

Founding Fathers

Here let me help you get started in your education of First Amendment law. BTW--when statues, federal or state, conflict with the U.S. Constitution including the Amendments the latter takes primacy. And you hate all men. Here I am giving you a free basic legal education. Your welcome.


Which types of speech are not protected by the First Amendment?
Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (includes libel, slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

The Irony is too sweet, as our founding fathers committed several of these types of unprotected speech against the King and others in our revolutionary days......

[Unregistered]

The Irony is too sweet, as our founding fathers committed several of these types of unprotected speech against the King and others in our revolutionary days......

Nevertheless, that is the current state of First Amendment law. You want to change it to suit a particular agenda get yourself appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

[Unregistered]

Here let me help you get started in your education of First Amendment law. BTW--when statues, federal or state, conflict with the U.S. Constitution including the Amendments the latter takes primacy. And you hate all men. Here I am giving you a free basic legal education. Your welcome.


Which types of speech are not protected by the First Amendment?
Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (includes libel, slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

Hate speech is considered a form of fighting words, Bozo.
Read the law.

[Unregistered]

Here let me help you get started in your education of First Amendment law. BTW--when statues, federal or state, conflict with the U.S. Constitution including the Amendments the latter takes primacy. And you hate all men. Here I am giving you a free basic legal education. Your welcome.


Which types of speech are not protected by the First Amendment?
Although different scholars view unprotected speech in different ways, there are basically nine categories:

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (includes libel, slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

Them's fighting words if I ever did hear

Honestly ladies, why are we feeding the trolls. Let's stop posting and let this thread fade into TS oblivion. The trolls might keep it alive for a little while by talking to each other and pretending to be women responding, but then, that's no fun and this thread will die. This is my last post here. Peace out.