Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Valencia CF Academy vs. FC Barcelona Academy - Pros & Cons

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Valencia has a lot less teams but have similar ratios.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Absolutely not true. 20 may be a stretch because some did go back, but 15 sounds about right if you include the two directors.
      why does this matter? who cares? shall we compare richards in the shower?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        why does this matter? who cares? shall we compare richards in the shower?
        Of course it matters, just like the size of your richard. I know you wife tells you otherwise, but she's lying.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Valencia has a lot less teams but have similar ratios.
          So every one of Valencia's top teams in every age group is coached by someone from Valencia?

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Hey Keith, I’m guessing you replaced your son as community manager. Since you got some time on your hands in between writing post maybe you can review your company’s upcoming court case.

            http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/iscr...No=650647-2018
            I have been reading about this lawsuit for what feels like months; the implication was always that Barca or Prospect did something wrong and were being sued and "boy were they going to pay". All fantasy. Prospect brings an action against the landlord to protect their rights for either breach of their lease, or at least having been mislead in lease negotiations, and anti-barca people are using that as a basis for trashing them; amazing.

            This is not a situation where a tenant is not paying and landlord hasn't heard from them (typical non-payment situation where tenant has no money), this is actually a situation where tenant probably had to pay good money to engage lawyers to bring a suit (tenant has money).

            Who knows what the truth is, but it certainly feels like anti-barca people (I would make an "antiba" joke, but this site has had to dumb political discussion already) are overstating the situation, and makes me question everything else I am reading that is anti-barca as well.

            Comment


              I’m pretty sure all the older teams do. Some of the younger teams don’t but I thinks that’s more of a team choice then anything else because some of the Spanish trainers are hard to understand especially when they are mad.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                why does this matter? who cares? shall we compare richards in the shower?
                It matters because if people wanted their kids trained by the typical Long Island coach to play the typical Long Island style of kick and run, they would have stayed at their last club. It matters because this area is dominated by second rate British coaches who have done absolutely nothing to improve the game for our young players.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  I have been reading about this lawsuit for what feels like months; the implication was always that Barca or Prospect did something wrong and were being sued and "boy were they going to pay". All fantasy. Prospect brings an action against the landlord to protect their rights for either breach of their lease, or at least having been mislead in lease negotiations, and anti-barca people are using that as a basis for trashing them; amazing.

                  This is not a situation where a tenant is not paying and landlord hasn't heard from them (typical non-payment situation where tenant has no money), this is actually a situation where tenant probably had to pay good money to engage lawyers to bring a suit (tenant has money).

                  Who knows what the truth is, but it certainly feels like anti-barca people (I would make an "antiba" joke, but this site has had to dumb political discussion already) are overstating the situation, and makes me question everything else I am reading that is anti-barca as well.
                  I’m not sure it’s as simple as that. When a tenant sues a landlord it’s typically to break the lease. According to everything on here we got fields being built so I am not sure if the fields are being built at all. If anyone here know’s Keith D’s track record then they know he made his money suing people. He use to find big companies that utilized relatively small technologies in their operations, quickly file a patent on that technology after the fact and then claim The company owes him money. That’s Keith MO.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Absolutely not true. 20 may be a stretch because some did go back, but 15 sounds about right if you include the two directors.
                    This is simple to figure out. Barca has two houses for the coaches they brought here from Spain. Each house has 5-6 coaches living there. Both tech directors live separate from the rest of the coaches. So that's 12-14 coaches total that are here from Spain. Then you have a couple of guys who pass through from time to time that are pretty high up on the Barca coaching ladder. They give the coaches here classes and updates on the Barca methodology and review the coaching sessions.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      I’m not sure it’s as simple as that. When a tenant sues a landlord it’s typically to break the lease. According to everything on here we got fields being built so I am not sure if the fields are being built at all. If anyone here know’s Keith D’s track record then they know he made his money suing people. He use to find big companies that utilized relatively small technologies in their operations, quickly file a patent on that technology after the fact and then claim The company owes him money. That’s Keith MO.
                      Well there is plenty of evidence from multiple sources that the fields are indeed being built as we speak. So why would Keith be building them if he intended on leaving?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Well there is plenty of evidence from multiple sources that the fields are indeed being built as we speak. So why would Keith be building them if he intended on leaving?

                        He will sell at the first opportunity. Keith will sell the franchise.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          He will sell at the first opportunity. Keith will sell the franchise.
                          Okay, so now that is bad (or good?), because in America that is called capitalism.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            I’m not sure it’s as simple as that. When a tenant sues a landlord it’s typically to break the lease. According to everything on here we got fields being built so I am not sure if the fields are being built at all. If anyone here know’s Keith D’s track record then they know he made his money suing people. He use to find big companies that utilized relatively small technologies in their operations, quickly file a patent on that technology after the fact and then claim The company owes him money. That’s Keith MO.
                            What are you talking about? So now all of the pictures on this site are also fakes? You are overplaying your hand a little bit on this.

                            What are you trying to communicate with your third sentence? And I totally disagree with your second sentence, just not true.

                            A tenant that wants to break a lease just vacates. If landlord can't fill space, then landlord sues, noone wants to pay lawyers if party is generally left even or a little in the hole, just not worth it. Tenants sue to make sure that landlord lives up to its obligations in a lease, for whatever services or other obligations that landlord is required to perform; this case seems special to me since a rent adjustment was built into lease with respect to fill to be excavated from site - somebody lied, or somebody wasn't paying attention when they toured the site.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              I have been reading about this lawsuit for what feels like months; the implication was always that Barca or Prospect did something wrong and were being sued and "boy were they going to pay". All fantasy. Prospect brings an action against the landlord to protect their rights for either breach of their lease, or at least having been mislead in lease negotiations, and anti-barca people are using that as a basis for trashing them; amazing.

                              This is not a situation where a tenant is not paying and landlord hasn't heard from them (typical non-payment situation where tenant has no money), this is actually a situation where tenant probably had to pay good money to engage lawyers to bring a suit (tenant has money).

                              Who knows what the truth is, but it certainly feels like anti-barca people (I would make an "antiba" joke, but this site has had to dumb political discussion already) are overstating the situation, and makes me question everything else I am reading that is anti-barca as well.
                              Antiba - that's a good one! No, I'm just a troll that likes to fire up the very, very insecure Barca parents on this fine (and free) website.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Of course it matters, just like the size of your richard. I know you wife tells you otherwise, but she's lying.
                                your confusing what your wife tells me. thanks for playing!

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X