Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What is happening to this country?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Because people like you do not know a difference between "federal and state" and where the separation exists. If you want it to become a federal law, make sure you get enough states on board (lets see which states resist).

    Also, your analogies are lame.
    - lots of packages from amazon are stolen and lost
    - signature verification is just an invitation for fraud through vote harvesting
    - many countries already adopted e-voting or i-voting

    Keep wondering with your 19th century thoughts.
    So glad we are following Venezuela's lead in e-voting and technology as we all know how above board they are!

    Amazon my lose some packages and yes some are stolen but that has nothing to do with their ability to issue bar codes for 3+ billion packages so when a lost package is found they know who it goes to.....and by your logic perhaps we should get rid of signing any contracts or loans or wills????

    You do know we are in the 21st century now ?
    During the 19th century (1800s) we starting using paper ballots just like we used in Nov 2020.....

    Comment


      #77
      Just remember - ballot fraud only occurred in Trump's case. It doesn't matter that down ballot candidates that were Republicans won. If it did, I guess that would make their victories fraudulent as well, right? :D

      The logic of the dumber-than-dirt Trumpers...

      Comment


        #78
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Just remember - ballot fraud only occurred in Trump's case. It doesn't matter that down ballot candidates that were Republicans won. If it did, I guess that would make their victories fraudulent as well, right? :D

        The logic of the dumber-than-dirt Trumpers...
        you must never have cheated on a test you don't get 100%! LOL

        It is possible to make it look good..and still gain control of all 3.....

        Comment


          #79
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          you must never have cheated on a test you don't get 100%! LOL

          It is possible to make it look good..and still gain control of all 3.....
          Uhmmm, okey dokey....

          Hey, if you hurry, you can still buy some "Q" garb on Amazon!

          Comment


            #80
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            you must never have cheated on a test you don't get 100%! LOL

            It is possible to make it look good..and still gain control of all 3.....
            I heard the Q Congress women answer the same way when she was yelling fraud and was asked wether her election was legitimate she answered she was only questioning the Presidential election. What Hawley was questioning was the PA election rules. What he neglected to mention is that the Commonwealth of PA is controlled by a Republican majority in both State houses. They were the ones who re-wrote the election rules for this election primarily to suppress the votes of Democrats especially in the Philadelphia area. These rules were to favor Republican candidates. What they were not counting on was all the people who voted ahead of time (in the millions) and thought they could suppress those numbers on Election Day. That is why they are so pissed off. Hawley didn’t talk about that nor the Democrat who won a state legislative seat and the Republicans refuse to acknowledge his victory. That is the Trump-Republican way!

            Comment


              #81
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              you must never have cheated on a test you don't get 100%! LOL

              It is possible to make it look good..and still gain control of all 3.....
              This is the logic you get with Trumpers. They mindlessly regurgitate what FOX and Trump says to try to rationalize an argument to fit their own world view.. Lets call these people stupid and move on. This is not a time for civility when dealing with these morons, This a time a time to peacefully call out their nonsense and shut down their deflection and stupidity.
              Anytime Ii get into a political conversation with a Trumper, the first question, I ask them is if they think the election was stolen. If the answer yes, i know they are not rooted here on planet earth. No need to continue the discussion. I also know to cut ties and never trust their judgement about anything

              Comment


                #82
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Just something to think about....Amazon delivered 3.5 billion packages in 2019 all with a different bar code associated with a person, most cell phones have finger print readers, all grammer school kids have photo id with bar codes..etc....yet we in US have zero voter id ! and any attempt to have it is fought tooth and nail.....so 2020 we have paper ballots that once separated from its envelope has nothing on it to differentiate it from any other one...not even special paper ....then add some states not doing any signature verification at all....

                And you wonder why some may question ?????
                It is because most politicians don’t want accurate counts for elections. They don’t trust the public. They think they know better then the people they are supposed to represent. They are the elites and we are peons. They manipulate the election results to meet their needs. It happens with both parties, I not picking on one or the other.
                We need voter ID, improved systems for voting and a national minimum standard for the national elections.
                Can we get term limits for congress while we are at it.

                Comment


                  #83
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  It is because most politicians don’t want accurate counts for elections. They don’t trust the public. They think they know better then the people they are supposed to represent. They are the elites and we are peons. They manipulate the election results to meet their needs. It happens with both parties, I not picking on one or the other.
                  We need voter ID, improved systems for voting and a national minimum standard for the national elections.
                  Can we get term limits for congress while we are at it.
                  So Do you think the election was stolen from Trump?

                  Comment


                    #84
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    It is because most politicians don’t want accurate counts for elections. They don’t trust the public. They think they know better then the people they are supposed to represent. They are the elites and we are peons. They manipulate the election results to meet their needs. It happens with both parties, I not picking on one or the other.
                    We need voter ID, improved systems for voting and a national minimum standard for the national elections.
                    Can we get term limits for congress while we are at it.
                    There are green beans that are smarter than you...

                    Comment


                      #85
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      It is because most politicians don’t want accurate counts for elections. They don’t trust the public. They think they know better then the people they are supposed to represent. They are the elites and we are peons. They manipulate the election results to meet their needs. It happens with both parties, I not picking on one or the other.
                      We need voter ID, improved systems for voting and a national minimum standard for the national elections.
                      Can we get term limits for congress while we are at it.
                      Cons bristle at Federal-anything. They're all about "state's rights" but they want a Federal voting program lol

                      Comment


                        #86
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Cons bristle at Federal-anything. They're all about "state's rights" but they want a Federal voting program lol
                        Umm...when you are voting for a FEDERAL office, wouldn't that make sense?

                        lol

                        Comment


                          #87
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Umm...when you are voting for a FEDERAL office, wouldn't that make sense?

                          lol
                          You sir need to read the federalist papers, you can’t possibly offer an educated opinion without understanding the importance of state sovereignty. It makes you appear dumb as you try to reach for simple logic in managing the federal election. It is why opinions are like buttholes everyone has one , including the poorly educated. And remember Donald Trump loves the poorly educated.

                          Comment


                            #88
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            You sir need to read the federalist papers, you can’t possibly offer an educated opinion without understanding the importance of state sovereignty. It makes you appear dumb as you try to reach for simple logic in managing the federal election. It is why opinions are like buttholes everyone has one , including the poorly educated. And remember Donald Trump loves the poorly educated.
                            POTUS is a representative of the states. Popular vote is meaningless. That is why we have electoral college. Now, given that states have sovereign control of their elections, what do we do if 1, or 2 or more states create a system that only 1 party can win. Is that fair to the other states in the union? It must be balanced. While states are sovereign they are all part of the union. Why would a state stay in the union if the system is rigged against them? Both parties are guilty of try to manipulate or rig the system to their advantage. What do we do when this goes too far?

                            BTW - you are also probably one putting the Rona blame on the federal response instead of the sovereign states you preach about.

                            Comment


                              #89
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              POTUS is a representative of the states. Popular vote is meaningless. That is why we have electoral college. Now, given that states have sovereign control of their elections, what do we do if 1, or 2 or more states create a system that only 1 party can win. Is that fair to the other states in the union? It must be balanced. While states are sovereign they are all part of the union. Why would a state stay in the union if the system is rigged against them? Both parties are guilty of try to manipulate or rig the system to their advantage. What do we do when this goes too far?

                              BTW - you are also probably one putting the Rona blame on the federal response instead of the sovereign states you preach about.
                              Your logic is circular based on your education level on the matter.

                              If there is conflict in any way a particular state is holding an election, these matters will be settled by the courts, not the federal govt. This is explicitly stated in the constitution. It may be appealed up through the state courts all the way to the supreme court- and that is exactly what happened. Trump lost those cases in Republic run states and to a conservative majority on The US supreme court. This of course is why we have 3 separate but equal branches of govt. The ole "checks and balances.

                              As I stated before, Trump loves the poorly educated, They tend demonstrate piece meal logic without understanding the constitution.

                              Comment


                                #90
                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Your logic is circular based on your education level on the matter.

                                If there is conflict in any way a particular state is holding an election, these matters will be settled by the courts, not the federal govt. This is explicitly stated in the constitution. It may be appealed up through the state courts all the way to the supreme court- and that is exactly what happened. Trump lost those cases in Republic run states and to a conservative majority on The US supreme court. This of course is why we have 3 separate but equal branches of govt. The ole "checks and balances.

                                As I stated before, Trump loves the poorly educated, They tend demonstrate piece meal logic without understanding the constitution.
                                Sound like an Ivy League wannabe....

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X