Has anyone experimented with automatic cameras to film games such as Veo or Trace?
Just wondering if its worth it and which is best
Just wondering if its worth it and which is best
-
-
Used Trace at a tournament 2 years ago. Wasn't particularly happy with the video quality. It's a high-def 360 camera, but because it produces a video that tries to track the ball, the output ends up being very low-resolution. Also, at least 2 years ago the AI used to track the ball and the play wasn't great, so it ends up with the ball out of frame for a significant amount fo time, even worse if there are other balls or games in view (like at a tournament; not as much of an issue if at an isolated field). Of course, maybe things have improved over 2 years, but that was my impression.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
That said, the player stats on Trace were pretty cool since all players wear a sensor and that stuff is pretty accurate. -
Our club uses Veo and like it. It's easy to highlight plays, and the screen stitching enables for a big portion of the field to be shown.Comment
-
Very, its easy, and does a great job.Comment
-
What is the cost of Veo?
Do they have team subscriptions if entire club doesn’t use?Comment
-
We have a group Veo subscription. $50 bucks per kid. Decent quality considering it's all done without human intervention once the filming starts. Great to be able to watch games back.Comment
-
Pooling resources is a great idea for teams, assuming most want to pony up the bucks. Dumb to have multiple parents taping at games.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
Comment