Jefferson Cup 2022

[Guest]

They make no mention of any actual person as part of the definition of "ECNL Member Club" because you would have to be an idiot or a scam artist to argue that the definition doesn't include the club's employees.

You must not work in the real world if you're redefining the definitions in a document.

[Guest]

ECNL Member Club is literally the second definition on the first page of the competition rules.

"ECNL Member Club" is not the definition of "ECNL Club" ... See how words matter.

[Guest]

You must not work in the real world if you're redefining the definitions in a document.

If it doesn’t mention coaches it must mean the kids can’t practice or train on pda complex at all. It doesn’t mention coaches. ECNL knows all these coaches can’t make enough money through coaching these teams and must allow outside training.

[Guest]

"ECNL Member Club" is not the definition of "ECNL Club" ... See how words matter.

Reading is fundamental.

1.2 "ECNL Member Club" means a member club of the ECNL, as provided in the bylaws of the ECNL, participating in ECNL Club Competition for the ECNL Season. For purposes of these Regulations, an "ECNL Club" includes both ECNL Member Clubs and clubs participating in the ECNL Regional League.

[Guest]

Reading is fundamental.

1.2 "ECNL Member Club" means a member club of the ECNL, as provided in the bylaws of the ECNL, participating in ECNL Club Competition for the ECNL Season. For purposes of these Regulations, an "ECNL Club" includes both ECNL Member Clubs and clubs participating in the ECNL Regional League.

Yes, I guess general understanding isn't a strong suit of yours. An "ECNL Member Club" is not an "ECNL Club" as the "ECNL Club" INCLUDES "ECNL Member Clubs. See the "ECNL Club encompasses everything within while "ECNL Member Club" means a member club of the ECNL, as provided in the bylaws of the ECNL, participating in ECNL Club Competition for the ECNL Season.

[Guest]

If it doesn’t mention coaches it must mean the kids can’t practice or train on pda complex at all. It doesn’t mention coaches. ECNL knows all these coaches can’t make enough money through coaching these teams and must allow outside training.

Employment law is extensive in these situations because it's common to have coaches in any sport provide outside training at non-club affiliated fields and facilities. MF coaches do the same exact thing that PDA coaches do to help make extra money.

There's no way the PDA coaches would train kids from another ECNL club at their fields in a team setting because they know that's against the rules and this situation with a private training at a private facility is not against the rules. That's why MF isn't using that as an argument for dismissing the four girls.

[Guest]

Don’t understand how a club continues to employ individuals whose actions continue to bring negative attention to its organization. One leveraged the claim of having the #1 U12 girls team in the country and the other recruited the coach leveraging the claim of having the #1 U12 girls team in the country. Seems like all these parties were living in fantasy land.

Matchfit needs to take a probiotic and flush these two turds from its system.

[Guest]

"ECNL Member Club" is not the definition of "ECNL Club" ... See how words matter.

If words matter, they would have explicitly included the word COACH. Buy words do matter and they left it OUT.

[Guest]

You must not work in the real world if you're redefining the definitions in a document.

First, there is such thing as customary law. Since a club must be made up of volunteers or employees, it would be customary to include them in the definition of club. Second, it is common sense. Finally, you're a POS that makes NJ youth soccer the cesspool that it is a higher levels.

[Guest]

First, there is such thing as customary law. Since a club must be made up of volunteers or employees, it would be customary to include them in the definition of club. Second, it is common sense. Finally, you're a POS that makes NJ youth soccer the cesspool that it is a higher levels.

Most coaches are neither volunteers nor employees.

[Guest]

Most coaches are neither volunteers nor employees.

Lol. Do you really want to go with the "contractor" argument? They're still representatives of the club. You can add coaches as customary under the definition of a team.

[Guest]

Lol. Do you really want to go with the "contractor" argument? They're still representatives of the club. You can add coaches as customary under the definition of a team.

How about parents? Are they representatives of the club? How about team managers?

There's a reason why the rules have definitions.

[Guest]

How about parents? Are they representatives of the club? How about team managers?

There's a reason why the rules have definitions.

Do they host training sessions without any of the club coaches? The logic and rationale here is indicative of the education system in this country. Most of you are idiots

[Guest]

They make no mention of any actual person as part of the definition of "ECNL Member Club" because you would have to be an idiot or a scam artist to argue that the definition doesn't include the club's employees.

You can't make this claim because in other places the rules are very specific. The reason ECNL rules doesn't specify coaches is because they would open themselves up to being sued by coaches. If they include in their rules that players can't train with certain coaches they would be vulnerable to an antitrust law suit. A bigger company with control of the market denying small businesses customers is a good way to get sued.

[Guest]

Do they host training sessions without any of the club coaches? The logic and rationale here is indicative of the education system in this country. Most of you are idiots

If the office admin at FC Stars wants to get a few ECNL girls together to play in a beach soccer tournament is she breaking the ECNL rules?