Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PDA North Sucks

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Guest View Post
    Geography / market size and distance is such a big part of how ECNL & GA determien whether clubs can participate that it would be a pretty big deal if the league just let MFA spread teams across multiple locations at such big distances. The biggest reason many clubs get turned down when trying to enter is proximity to another member, so Match Fit just walking theiur clubs down to the shore so much closer to PDAS & Philly teams seems like it would get denied. They have to at least pretend those ecnl teams are out of the main location.
    The MF Shore 09 team is based out of North. That's their home fields. They just happen to practice out of Tinton Falls. Tetro knows how to work around every single obstacle to his advantage. Got to give the guy credit, he can't coach a team to save his life but the guy has a golden touch when it comes to getting what he wants.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Guest View Post
      Not even close. 2010 North Team is a league ahead from MFS 2010.
      They’ve played 3 times. 0-0. 2-0 North. 1-0 North (goal with about 2 mins left in game). They aren’t much ahead. And shore team is only 5 months old. Just wait.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Guest View Post

        The MF Shore 09 team is based out of North. That's their home fields. They just happen to practice out of Tinton Falls. Tetro knows how to work around every single obstacle to his advantage. Got to give the guy credit, he can't coach a team to save his life but the guy has a golden touch when it comes to getting what he wants.
        They only play games up north because ECNL dictates that...as that is only approved ECNL location for MF...everywhere else is not at all ECNL...they have used the same marking crap
        with all location starting with Montclair using the carrot of ECNL to get parents to pay into their system when in fact there is almost no chance/hope that even any ECRL players will get to the actual ECNL teams....but does allow them to get away with having 25+ on lower team rosters!! All business and very little soccer...
        ss

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Guest View Post

          They’ve played 3 times. 0-0. 2-0 North. 1-0 North (goal with about 2 mins left in game). They aren’t much ahead. And shore team is only 5 months old. Just wait.

          I was told the shore coach already told the shore team they are the ECNL team. I believe he told the 11’s that too. Either it’s true or it’s not. If it’s true, MF as a whole is being deceptive. If it’s not true, the shore coach is being deceptive. Either way this is very dirty.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Guest View Post

            They’ve played 3 times. 0-0. 2-0 North. 1-0 North (goal with about 2 mins left in game). They aren’t much ahead. And shore team is only 5 months old. Just wait.
            What? Not much ahead... North won the league undefeated (8-0-0) ...Meanwhile Shore is in 7th place with a record of 2-5-0.

            Comment


              #36
              He did not tell the 10s or 11s. Facts!

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Guest View Post

                They only play games up north because ECNL dictates that...as that is only approved ECNL location for MF...everywhere else is not at all ECNL...they have used the same marking crap
                with all location starting with Montclair using the carrot of ECNL to get parents to pay into their system when in fact there is almost no chance/hope that even any ECRL players will get to the actual ECNL teams....but does allow them to get away with having 25+ on lower team rosters!! All business and very little soccer...
                ss
                ECNL dictates that all fixture matches need to be played out if the same location but they don’t dictate where that needs to be.

                MF could run ECNL/RL matches out of Monmouth HS which has three turf fields and is an hour closer for every team in the conference other than PDA Blue.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Guest View Post

                  ECNL dictates that all fixture matches need to be played out if the same location but they don’t dictate where that needs to be.

                  MF could run ECNL/RL matches out of Monmouth HS which has three turf fields and is an hour closer for every team in the conference other than PDA Blue.
                  Except none of the other Shore teams have ever played any of their games at Monmouth. They only practice there. Most games are played on the grass at Sycamore.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Guest View Post

                    Except none of the other Shore teams have ever played any of their games at Monmouth. They only practice there. Most games are played on the grass at Sycamore.
                    You're obviously focused on the younger ages where 9v9 and 7v7 fields are needed. I'm talking about ECNL and ECRL games which are 11v11.

                    Comment

                    Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                    Auto-Saved
                    x
                    Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                    x
                    Working...
                    X