Derry Socccerclub

[Guest]

YES - These tryouts will be run by the NEW England Revs.

I don’t think that is correct.

[Guest]

Haven’t you been keeping up? His son is now a football star. Google it. How’s your kid doing?

Thats the word on the street. And no college soccer, looks like for all the time spent with soccer - mom and dad payed no attention to classes and study. What an absolute disgrace.

[Guest]

Some changes at Derry. Pres and Vp just stepped down.

[Guest]

Some changes at Derry. Pres and Vp just stepped down.

Good news. Those jerks made SC and ML look as harmless as Bert and Ernie.

[Guest]

Good news. Those jerks made SC and ML look as harmless as Bert and Ernie.

They are still listed.

[Guest]

They are still listed.

Because they can’t figure out how to update the website. If they could they’d distance themselves from those dirtbags immediately.

[Guest]

Who does DSC got running their social media page? Have they never seen a veo before? Every other post is about it. We get it. You used the club fees to buy a camera to benefit your own kids. You added an umbrella. Cool!

[Guest]

Who does DSC got running their social media page? Have they never seen a veo before? Every other post is about it. We get it. You used the club fees to buy a camera to benefit your own kids. You added an umbrella. Cool!

Ouch. But true.

[Guest]

If the Derry Soccer Club is a 501(c)(3), they should provide their budget for examination. Charging rec kids increased fees to cover cameras for the benefit of the board members’ children should be a red flag. As a nonprofit benefiting the kids in a very working class town, the primary goal should be the lowest fees possible for rec soccer and travel for all children, not just the teams the board has children on. Purchasing a veo with club funds and then flaunting videos of their own kids via social media is borderline immoral. A town soccer club doesn’t need to own a veo. Camera should be returned and fees should be lowered for fall.

[Guest]

If the Derry Soccer Club is a 501(c)(3), they should provide their budget for examination. Charging rec kids increased fees to cover cameras for the benefit of the board members’ children should be a red flag. As a nonprofit benefiting the kids in a very working class town, the primary goal should be the lowest fees possible for rec soccer and travel for all children, not just the teams the board has children on. Purchasing a veo with club funds and then flaunting videos of their own kids via social media is borderline immoral. A town soccer club doesn’t need to own a veo. Camera should be returned and fees should be lowered for fall.

This club has been mismanaged for years. Shouldn’t be a surprise people use the club for their own benefit! After all - all these kids will be cut from Pinkerton eventually if they are ever actually make the roster! None will ever play in college that stay there past u11. There is NO development of players and almost all the coaches have never played the game. Arrogance and incompetence abound there.