Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
-
There are bound to be issues of potential conflicts and I'm sure the republican congressmen and women will address those as they see fit. I mean they were fine with Ivanka working in the Oval Office and getting trademarks from communist China without bothering to open up an investigation or even acknowledge that conflict. They were fine with EPA anti-environment lobbyist being put in charge of the EPA. Politics. -
Why is it that anytime someone brings up something about biden the libs have no answers, and can't defend him. All they do is keeping bringing up Trump.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Biden appoints anti-Israel, pro-Hamas man to key Middle East post
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...-east-post.phpComment
-
Comment
-
Incompetent Dem donor to help lead Biden’s economic response to pandemic
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...o-pandemic.phpComment
-
As I said, there are bound to be conflicts with politicians. Dems don't need to agree with 100% of what Biden does. Not knowing all the facts and the reason for the pick (and you don't either), I would prefer someone else. But I don't see it as a big issue. There is no way to be perfect no matter what you do as president. This to me is a very minor issue.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
As to why we keep bring up Trump, that's because he set the precedent on this very topic so why should we not bring it up? Sort of like why not pass this 1.9 trillion legislative the exact same way republicans passed their wasteful tax cut when the economy was humming. A party who turned a blind eye to the graft and nepotism oozing from the Trump administration doesn't deserve any deference when it comes to these issues. I would be far more upset, far more, if Biden anointed his daughter as senior adviser and gave her an office in the White House.
Did you have any concerns about Ivanka and Jared being given those roles while they were making tens of millions on their private businesses? I suspect you won't answer and will deflect.Comment
-
Show me how they made money illegally. It's funny because you have no problem with the bidens making billions from Ukraine and China.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
I knew you wouldn't answer. I never said they made money illegally. But it is nepotism and is surely a conflict. I asked if you were ok with that nepotism and you couldn't even bring yourself to answer. You deflect while accusing me of deflection.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
The problem with trying to have a conversation on this topic is that you believe Trump is god and never did any wrong. You also believe he won the election.
The democrats will be using Trump's administration and the republicans' conduct as the benchmark. Remember Merrick Garland? Your response to this very minor issue of an appointee in the justice department makes me think that you are royally pissed about everything Biden is doing. And I enjoy that very much. An awful lot. Carry on.Comment
-
We Libs don’t have much patience for Cons’ “Look, Squirrel!”! posts when an insurrection just took place. Not surprising at all that Cons want us to focus on squirrels.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Ok, show me how they made money via nepotism and then I can answer your question.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
As for the rest of your post you don't know me or what I believe and you're assumptions are way off base, but I guess that's what happens when you're so sanctimonious.Comment
-
Cons are petrified of Garland as the new attorney general. As well they should be. Qbwahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Well, the RAT president must be worried about his RAT influence-peddling and money-laundering son. He appointed a head of the criminal division who is friends with his RAT son's lawyer. Can you imagine the uproar if a Republican pulled a low-down corrupt RAT stunt like that.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
I know you well. You have no problem with Trump's nepotism but you have a problem if a political appointee may somehow by some chance potentially favor Hunter Biden rather than recuse himself to make sure that doesn't occur. You think that Biden's justice department will be as filthy as Trump's -- the one that tried to intervene in Trump's lawsuit where he is accused of rape so that Barr could defend him with my tax dollars. You were fine with that too I'm sure.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
You call me sanctimonious because in your mind all of that nepotism, graft and appointment of unqualified cabinet members was perfectly fine with you under Trump and it sucks admitting that you're a hypocrite. It also pains you that Biden is shredding Trump's horrendous legacy. And I love it!Comment
-
Talk about deflection. You couldn't answer my question and as I stated in my original post every time we criticize biden you bring up Trump, which is exactly what you did. Thanks for making my point!Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Hey Rat Boy! We give you, Jared and Ivanka. Then there's the children of Rudy Colludy, Barr and Pompeo who also worked for the administration. Then the dozens of friends and big donors whoTrump gave plum positions to.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
To date the right has never provided one shred of evidence of Biden family corruption - all accusations. A GOP led committee found no legal wrongdoing by the Biden's (but did call Hunter's position "problematic" and many on the left agree). Why would Trump sit on information that could have guaranteed he would win in 2020? Well, there wasn't anything to sit on.Comment
Comment