Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
OP here again. The size argument is as futile as the ECNL vs. DA argument. Everyone has an opinion. No one is likely to change that opinion, and the only truth goes back to my mantra---which you can conveniently use to answer many questions in soccer---if you're good, you're good!!
THAT being said, I will share my opinion based on my experience in D1 soccer: Generally speaking, size is a factor. Before everyone loses their minds and starts citing Messi and company, let me also say that one of the very best, toughest, most impactful soccer players I ever saw was Diana Matheson. Listed officially at 5'0, she's probably 4'11 in bare feet. She was a stud on the Canadian National team, Ivy League rooking of the year, Ivy League Player of the year, and led Princeton to an NCAA final four in 2004. She's an absolute beast, if you want google you can find some highlights. And, the tiniest thing you've ever seen. She alone blows the doors off the size argument.
However, she is the exception, not the norm, and I've seen many crazy good players that are top dogs in D3 simply because they would get crushed physically in D1. For most, NOT ALL, it is an issue. With the throngs of young girls playing soccer, the talent pool is huge, and humans have progressively gotten bigger so now instead of just finding the skilled, athletic, and fast players, we can find lots of skilled, athletic, and fast players, who, by the way are also big. All things being equal, any coach would go for the bigger body.
One poster referenced the physicality and it's totally true. I was also at the ICC Futures tourney and would 100% agree with the American style vs. the European style. Its true for our USWNT as well. The rest of the world had caught up and surpassed our Women's game in terms of technical ability.....we do not play the prettiest soccer, but we are good enough and are just way better athletes. We can argue all day about that, but we did win 2 World Cups.
THAT being said, I will share my opinion based on my experience in D1 soccer: Generally speaking, size is a factor. Before everyone loses their minds and starts citing Messi and company, let me also say that one of the very best, toughest, most impactful soccer players I ever saw was Diana Matheson. Listed officially at 5'0, she's probably 4'11 in bare feet. She was a stud on the Canadian National team, Ivy League rooking of the year, Ivy League Player of the year, and led Princeton to an NCAA final four in 2004. She's an absolute beast, if you want google you can find some highlights. And, the tiniest thing you've ever seen. She alone blows the doors off the size argument.
However, she is the exception, not the norm, and I've seen many crazy good players that are top dogs in D3 simply because they would get crushed physically in D1. For most, NOT ALL, it is an issue. With the throngs of young girls playing soccer, the talent pool is huge, and humans have progressively gotten bigger so now instead of just finding the skilled, athletic, and fast players, we can find lots of skilled, athletic, and fast players, who, by the way are also big. All things being equal, any coach would go for the bigger body.
One poster referenced the physicality and it's totally true. I was also at the ICC Futures tourney and would 100% agree with the American style vs. the European style. Its true for our USWNT as well. The rest of the world had caught up and surpassed our Women's game in terms of technical ability.....we do not play the prettiest soccer, but we are good enough and are just way better athletes. We can argue all day about that, but we did win 2 World Cups.
Comment