Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2003 vs 2004

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    2003 vs 2004

    Out of curiosity, I noticed that the boys 2003 age group (U17) looks a lot more talented and a lot more physical than the 2004 (U16) age group? Not only in Mass, but perhaps the entire nation, too? Just a thought

    #2
    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Out of curiosity, I noticed that the boys 2003 age group (U17) looks a lot more talented and a lot more physical than the 2004 (U16) age group? Not only in Mass, but perhaps the entire nation, too? Just a thought
    How many 15- and 16- year old boys have you been watching?

    Comment


      #3
      my guy, theres 17 year olds too

      Comment


        #4
        Looks like parents started buying "organic" crap from places like Whole Foods starting with the 2004 kids. All the 2003 kids rolled around in the dirt and ate foods full of hormones.

        Comment


          #5
          Gee, maybe the age difference and the fact that boys and finish puberty later than girls (hence are still putting on muscle mass well throughout high school), has something to do with it?

          Duh.

          Comment

          Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
          Auto-Saved
          x
          Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
          x
          Working...
          X