Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

England should revoke Geoff Cameron work permit

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Let us boycott Nordstrom. Do you know why? Because Trump just tweeted that they treated his daughter unfairly. BTW, from his governmental phone paid with my tax $.
    Your 0.0003 contribution doesn't get you a vote on how he communicates with us. Go protest inst ad and contribute to the millions of dollars lost for this nonsense.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Is it illegal? What's your point?
      If you can't see wrong in that, who am I to convince you?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Your 0.0003 contribution doesn't get you a vote on how he communicates with us. Go protest inst ad and contribute to the millions of dollars lost for this nonsense.
        Tweeting something to promote his daughter's business or to bash who demoted her product from Presidential phone is communicating with us? Seriously, you are definitely part of the ones he said that he can shoot someone and you will still vote for him.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          If you can't see wrong in that, who am I to convince you?
          I get your point, if you mean he's using his authority for a private business matter for his family.

          If he used it to rail against different private business matter, would that be OK?

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            I get your point, if you mean he's using his authority for a private business matter for his family.

            If he used it to rail against different private business matter, would that be OK?
            You won: everything Trump does is right and ok.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              You won: everything Trump does is right and ok.
              Stop being so butthurt all the time. I said I see your point.

              I am just curious if you think the point applies to all private businesses, or just his. Philosophically, is it that fact that it's a business matter, or that it involves his family, that has your thong wound too tight?

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                I get your point, if you mean he's using his authority for a private business matter for his family.

                If he used it to rail against different private business matter, would that be OK?
                The president has massive conflicts of interest and they are going to pollute every decision he makes as was predicted many times.

                What are companies to do? Rather than focus on their business and all the jobs they provide they are now stuck trying to navigate this toxic political environment and there is no escape.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  The president has massive conflicts of interest and they are going to pollute every decision he makes as was predicted many times.

                  What are companies to do? Rather than focus on their business and all the jobs they provide they are now stuck trying to navigate this toxic political environment and there is no escape.
                  I think that's going to come with the territory, no matter who the President is if they come from the private sector. It's unavoidable.

                  What have to decide if we only want to be led by life-long politicians, or if we want to entertain an outsider's perspective.

                  It puts other businesses in a tight spot, if they can't run a business for fear of protesting. Where does it stop though? What's to stop anyone from protesting anything because they are (loosely or directly) tied to an official?

                  See Oranjina with a can of Coke? Protest.
                  See him eating a slice of pizza from Pizza Hut? Protest.
                  Gets out of a Cadillac? Protest.

                  Shoot...people are seriously no longer Patriots fans over this.

                  Where does it end?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    I think that's going to come with the territory, no matter who the President is if they come from the private sector. It's unavoidable.

                    What have to decide if we only want to be led by life-long politicians, or if we want to entertain an outsider's perspective.

                    It puts other businesses in a tight spot, if they can't run a business for fear of protesting. Where does it stop though? What's to stop anyone from protesting anything because they are (loosely or directly) tied to an official?

                    See Oranjina with a can of Coke? Protest.
                    See him eating a slice of pizza from Pizza Hut? Protest.
                    Gets out of a Cadillac? Protest.

                    Shoot...people are seriously no longer Patriots fans over this.

                    Where does it end?
                    It would calm the waters immensely if he would publish the returns and put his finances into a blind trust.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      It would calm the waters immensely if he would publish the returns and put his finances into a blind trust.
                      On the surface, I agree. It certainly has "bad optics", and he has to understand that this is to be expected, as you mentioned.

                      The cynic in me thinks there will always be something else to whine about though.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        I think that's going to come with the territory, no matter who the President is if they come from the private sector. It's unavoidable.

                        What have to decide if we only want to be led by life-long politicians, or if we want to entertain an outsider's perspective.

                        It puts other businesses in a tight spot, if they can't run a business for fear of protesting. Where does it stop though? What's to stop anyone from protesting anything because they are (loosely or directly) tied to an official?

                        See Oranjina with a can of Coke? Protest.
                        See him eating a slice of pizza from Pizza Hut? Protest.
                        Gets out of a Cadillac? Protest.

                        Shoot...people are seriously no longer Patriots fans over this.

                        Where does it end?
                        DT was almost not a fan anymore after that first half. Good thing TB turned it around or he might have lost his fair weather bestie.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          On the surface, I agree. It certainly has "bad optics", and he has to understand that this is to be expected, as you mentioned.

                          The cynic in me thinks there will always be something else to whine about though.
                          Not too worried about Dt and what he did or not expect. The poor slobs employed by Nordstroms or whatever company is next up in the cross hairs, probably struggle enough without this stress.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Not too worried about Dt and what he did or not expect. The poor slobs employed by Nordstroms or whatever company is next up in the cross hairs, probably struggle enough without this stress.
                            Are you encouraging or discouraging the activity from those boycotting, causing said stress?

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Are you encouraging or discouraging the activity from those boycotting, causing said stress?
                              I would encourage putting up candidates without such extreme and unknown conflicts of interest.

                              The environment is toxic. Are we going to end up with red retailers and blue retailers?

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                I would encourage putting up candidates without such extreme and unknown conflicts of interest.

                                The environment is toxic. Are we going to end up with red retailers and blue retailers?
                                I think any private candidate is going to have those issues, as I mentioned.

                                So, I guess the theory is that only lifelong government employees should run for office, for fear of a conflict of interest (real or imagined)?

                                Should Red people start to protest Nancy Pelosi's vineyard, since she rode that wave to becoming amongst the top 1% of earners in America? Is that the direction we want to take this?

                                Elizabeth Warren has made over a million bucks from Harvard for a part-time teaching job. Should Red people protest that?

                                Unless people can separate an office-holder from their past business dealings, yes...I do fear we are going to start to have Red and Blue retailers.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X