Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hope solo suspended
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYup, basketball used to allow 4 corners too but they changed the rule to a shot clock because that's not how the game is supposed to be played. Packing 10 in the box is awful soccer. Kudos for doing what you need do to win but playing for pks or a breakaway is horrible for the greater good of the game. US soccer needs an enemia.
FWIW - I don't blame Sweden for playing that style. It wasn't pretty, but it worked. An overmatched team got the result they needed.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYup, basketball used to allow 4 corners too but they changed the rule to a shot clock because that's not how the game is supposed to be played. Packing 10 in the box is awful soccer. Kudos for doing what you need do to win but playing for pks or a breakaway is horrible for the greater good of the game. US soccer needs an enemia.
you want to penalize a team for playing good defense
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostRight! Then, of course who do they call first when they need something?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postbad example- 4 corners was an Offensive stall - thats why they changed the rule
you want to penalize a team for playing good defense
From Wikipedia:
A defensive three-second violation, also known as illegal defense, is a basketball rules infraction in the National Basketball Association (NBA) introduced in the 2001–2002 season. It is assessed when a member of the defending team spends more than three seconds in the free throw lane (also known as the 16-foot lane, or colloquially as "in the paint") while not actively guarding an opponent....
The team committing a defensive three-second violation is assessed a team technical foul. The offense will receive one free throw and retain possession of the ball.[4]
Prior to the 2001–2002 NBA season, any form of zone defense was considered an illegal defense violation and resulted in a warning on the first violation and then a technical foul for any subsequent violations.[5] However, the defensive three-second violation makes it difficult for NBA defenses to play zone, since zone defenses usually position a player in the middle of the key to stop penetration.[6]
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYup, basketball used to allow 4 corners too but they changed the rule to a shot clock because that's not how the game is supposed to be played. Packing 10 in the box is awful soccer. Kudos for doing what you need do to win but playing for pks or a breakaway is horrible for the greater good of the game. US soccer needs an enemia.
Holland rode this style to the 2010 WC Final. The Special One becomes special this way. Atletico goes to the CL final this way; Portugal in the Euros.
It's a problem all over football right now.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBack when I was growing up ( I'm 55), America was loved by almost everyone in the world....Now, not so much....probably more hated than loved....and wait til KKK guy becomes president...
Hate us all you want, but without fail, when there's a problem, America is asked to deliver and we always do. Even if the hypocrite wins. (you made it political)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYet, when there is a national disaster, first number called is always us.
Hate us all you want, but without fail, when there's a problem, America is asked to deliver and we always do. Even if the hypocrite wins. (you made it political)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThing is ,Solo was right. Sweden played like cowards. This country's so sensitive. You should hear what European players and managers say about their opponents in post game remarks. What's the big deal? Sweden did not come out to play that day. Pussies!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostPlease turn of the Ailes propaganda channel or get your news updated from WWII. Obviously you have an Internet connection, but you're living in an extreme delusion.
Not a Trump fan, nor a Fox fan. Just stating that when there is a disaster, America is always first in line to help out.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSolution then? Or, just a gripe? That's fine if it's the latter, but this can't be presented a recent issue. Negative football has been around for a while. Some rules were changed that helped a while back (back-passing to goalies, for example), but the end result is system football is taking over from creative football.
Holland rode this style to the 2010 WC Final. The Special One becomes special this way. Atletico goes to the CL final this way; Portugal in the Euros.
It's a problem all over football right now.
For a country that doesn't have soccer hard-wired into its culture, we sure sound like "beautiful soccer" snobs when we complain about others not playing the game "properly." It's as if we'd be happier with a system of judges who would award subjective scores based on which team was prettier. Very silly, IMO.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt is curious to me that we're hearing all these complaints about how an undermanned team took down the best team in the world. Where were all these complaints when the US men used a similar strategy to survive their group in the last World Cup?
For a country that doesn't have soccer hard-wired into its culture, we sure sound like "beautiful soccer" snobs when we complain about others not playing the game "properly." It's as if we'd be happier with a system of judges who would award subjective scores based on which team was prettier. Very silly, IMO.
I meant it's a "problem" in only that in nirvana, everyone would play aesthetically pleasing soccer. And puppies...there'd be puppies on the sidelines, too. But, winning comes first.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIn a relevant sense, the four corners comparison wasn't a "bad example" and packing the box hardly counts as playing "good defense." The sports ignorance among some soccer parents is embarrassing.
From Wikipedia:
A defensive three-second violation, also known as illegal defense, is a basketball rules infraction in the National Basketball Association (NBA) introduced in the 2001–2002 season. It is assessed when a member of the defending team spends more than three seconds in the free throw lane (also known as the 16-foot lane, or colloquially as "in the paint") while not actively guarding an opponent....
The team committing a defensive three-second violation is assessed a team technical foul. The offense will receive one free throw and retain possession of the ball.[4]
Prior to the 2001–2002 NBA season, any form of zone defense was considered an illegal defense violation and resulted in a warning on the first violation and then a technical foul for any subsequent violations.[5] However, the defensive three-second violation makes it difficult for NBA defenses to play zone, since zone defenses usually position a player in the middle of the key to stop penetration.[6]
thats why they don't allow zones-increase the scoring and entertainment value-fannies in the seats
go watch how the game is taught ,at the youth level-90% of teams play zone
ever notice that rule changes in professional sports always benefit the offense?
- Quote
Comment
Comment