I might be wrong, but I think for PG's they have to be 18 or younger heading into their PG year under NEPSAC rules.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ISL boys soccer
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAgree. ISL should pull out of NEPSAC. ISL schools cannot compete in the best school soccer league in the country.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The nepsac rule for a PG is as long as you are 19 on or by the first of September your good to play. So yes you can turn 20 on sept 2nd...
Teams I here have loaded up are:
Worcester after missing out last year for the first time in a while.
Choate under its new coach in his 2nd year
Loomis more PG's
Deerfield with new coach and the 20 mil to improve athletics
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
I think the isl will be more balanced this year. Milton last year were pretty much all seniors who had played club and high school together for a long time. Hope to see a good balance and great competition this year. From what I've heard there is a lot of good talent and high level players this year spread throughout the league.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNEPSAC is an organization with more than 100 schools. To suggest that ISL drop out is ridiculous. A more appropriate approach would be for the soccer factories like SK to withdraw.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Last time I checked Milton and Lawrence both won NE titles within the last two years. ISL is doing just fine even without PG's. Top ISL teams can definitely play with anyone in NE. How many titles has Worcester won?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Yeah, stop the ISL moaning. Instead of taking PGs, the ISLs routinely have new incoming players repeat their junior year so it's roughly equivalent (not sure it's a rule, but it doesn't seem like most take kids only for senior year). Besides, the ISL schools compete just fine.
If the ISL schools cared about everyone matching up perfectly, why would they play in a league composed of some Class A and some Class B schools, and some boarding schools and some day schools? Some say the boarding schools have an advantage (especially the rich ones, who can bring in studs from overseas) and some say the day schools (since they can basically bring in a club team that plays together year round). But like it or not NEPSAC, the ISL schools care more about the ISL league than the NEPSAC tourney (I'd expect some of the other "good" leagues feel the same way, while the independents have only NEPSAC to shoot for as far as winning titles goes).
All that being said, schools like PA, Exeter and Deerfield could kick everyone's butt (except maybe the old Berkshire or SK or schools loaded up with the Right to Dream players) if they wanted to- they have money, size, academic and other reputations that span the globe, ability to grant athletic scholarships, etc.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYeah, stop the ISL moaning. Instead of taking PGs, the ISLs routinely have new incoming players repeat their junior year so it's roughly equivalent (not sure it's a rule, but it doesn't seem like most take kids only for senior year). Besides, the ISL schools compete just fine.
If the ISL schools cared about everyone matching up perfectly, why would they play in a league composed of some Class A and some Class B schools, and some boarding schools and some day schools? Some say the boarding schools have an advantage (especially the rich ones, who can bring in studs from overseas) and some say the day schools (since they can basically bring in a club team that plays together year round). But like it or not NEPSAC, the ISL schools care more about the ISL league than the NEPSAC tourney (I'd expect some of the other "good" leagues feel the same way, while the independents have only NEPSAC to shoot for as far as winning titles goes).
All that being said, schools like PA, Exeter and Deerfield could kick everyone's butt (except maybe the old Berkshire or SK or schools loaded up with the Right to Dream players) if they wanted to- they have money, size, academic and other reputations that span the globe, ability to grant athletic scholarships, etc.
But I'm not so sure the ISL schools view the ISL tournament as more important than the Nepsac tournament any more. Maybe 10 - 15 years ago but not today. Nepsac soccer has plenty of powerhouse teams outside of ISL now. I'd venture to say that Milton players treasure their Nepsac trophy more than their ISL trophy.
Your point about repeat juniors is spot on, too. Tons of them in every sport all over Nepsac including ISL schools. No difference between those kids and PG's.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Brooks, Belmont Hill, Nobles and Lawrence will be fighting for the top of the league. Milton, Sebs, RL and BBN will be biting at their heels. MR from Nobles, DM from BBN, DS from Brooks and AK from Sebs will compete for player of the year awards. Should be a fun year in the league.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by UnregisteredBrooks, Belmont Hill, Nobles and Lawrence will be fighting for the top of the league. Milton, Sebs, RL and BBN will be biting at their heels. MR from Nobles, DM from BBN, DS from Brooks and AK from Sebs will compete for player of the year awards. Should be a fun year in the league.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBrooks, Belmont Hill, Nobles and Lawrence will be fighting for the top of the league. Milton, Sebs, RL and BBN will be biting at their heels. MR from Nobles, DM from BBN, DS from Brooks and AK from Sebs will compete for player of the year awards. Should be a fun year in the league.
Also, the player of year awards are wide open: Don't want to mention names but players from Middlesex, Lawrence, RL and St. Marks can be added to the mix
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by UnregisteredI think the following teams will be fighting for top of the league- BH, BBN, Lawrence, Milton, Brooks and Nobles.
Also, the player of year awards are wide open: Don't want to mention names but players from Middlesex, Lawrence, RL and St. Marks can be added to the mix
- Quote
Comment
Comment