The Consequences of Verbally Abusive Athletic Coaches

[Unregistered]

Perspective is on track for another epic meltdown today. lol

[Unregistered]

Perspective is on track for another epic meltdown today. lol

It's hard to have a meltdown when you are thoroughly enjoying yourself.

Let's humor BTNT and break down how illogical his claim is that he isn't the majority poster when he is identified. Unfortunately, he never accounts for logic and how ridiculous the denials look.

For starters, his claim hinges on a belief that one or more trolls care more about getting at the P man than making BTNT look bad. Since they provide no support posts for BTNT, what would they be getting out of trolling other than trying to agitate the P man? And what would they get out of agitating someone that no one here cares a thing about? And to do so as obsessively as would be required to track each and every thread and post, and to weave themselves around the posts that BTNT doesn't deny in the very same threads and often simultaneous with BTNT and the P man going back and forth? Not to mention that it is easy to tell when BTNT posts signing in, signs out and posts, and then signs back in again (like this morning).

There is also a huge incentive for BTNT to lie and minimize and suggest that trolls are mimicking him. He doesn't want people to presume he is this insane and this hateful, so it's obvious that all of the incentives are for him on the surface to appear disinterested in his obsessional hate-filled agendas and to insist that his hands are clean.

In short, there is not a single reason to believe that BTNT isn't posting exactly when the P man and others insist that he is. Not one.

[Unregistered]

This response is the definition of Obsession.

[Unregistered]

This response is the definition of Obsession.

To quote someone, aside from whether you think it is obsessed or not, what part of that post isn't true? Is there anything in the content that isn't patently obvious.

[Unregistered]

To quote someone, aside from whether you think it is obsessed or not, what part of that post isn't true? Is there anything in the content that isn't patently obvious.

I should have said that it is the definition of paranoid obsession.

[Unregistered]

I should have said that it is the definition of paranoid obsession.

A bit obsessive/excessive? Perhaps. Paranoid? Absolutely not. You can't make up a narrative where paranoia would even apply.

And of course continued total avoidance of the content.

[Unregistered]

Rant on, Nutjob.