Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
End of Club soccer as we know it in New England
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot really because the assumption that the Stars would automatically get the spot is probably short sighted. NEFC and MPS are both larger and relatively speaking producing equal if not greater results at this point. They would actually warrant equal if not greater consideration.
Unlike the ECNL, a girls DAP would have
-combined age groups
-a 6 day a week training program 10 months out of the year
-no requirement to travel to showcases
That has absolutely zero correlation with inclusion in DAP.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou are half right. NEFC and MPS are larger.
That has absolutely zero correlation with inclusion in DAP.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostReally, why you actually need to make this point? Pretty pathetic. We are talking hypotheticals and you have to ram home why the Stars would probably get the spot. As if you even have any insight at all into how such a decision would be made. What a turkey.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostReally, why you actually need to make this point? Pretty pathetic. We are talking hypotheticals and you have to ram home why the Stars would probably get the spot. As if you even have any insight at all into how such a decision would be made. What a turkey.
"NEFC and MPS are both larger and relatively speaking producing equal if not greater results at this point. They would actually warrant equal if not greater consideration."
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhat was this?
"NEFC and MPS are both larger and relatively speaking producing equal if not greater results at this point. They would actually warrant equal if not greater consideration."
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere really are two element involved in this discussion. The pro participation element and the pro development element. People who want to see a lot of kids just playing soccer for whatever reason they deem want to see things as all inclusive as possible but that really works cross purpose to people who have kids playing soccer with a purpose in mind. One wants to broaden the herd, while the other wants to thin it. The thing is to say that one group is right over the other would be wrong because they are both entitled to their goals. The real issue is how to incorporate both goals into a system. The real problem with the whole issue is we have basically abandoned any attempt to level based upon skill and that is swinging the pendulum towards things being super inclusionary. That is where the dumbing things down comments come from because those super inclusionary themes do negatively impact the super motivated players because it makes it harder for them to stand out. That is why we always end up talking about the top end players because their needs are not really being met.
I agree that promo-relegation is not the be all end all but the present "multi-path" scenario on the girls side really just doesn't work for all the reasons previously discussed. I think the big difference between the boys and girls sides is DAP. Even though DAP is not perfect, it does have an awful lot of things that a serious player wants. I think that if US Soccer put together a DAP on the girls side it would give those top end players a place to shoot for and that would go a long way towards settling down a lot of the discord on the girls side.
The top players aren't getting their needs met? Talk about turkeys. Why don't the rest of us just serve you turkey dinner with all the trimmings and watch you eat.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostReally, why you actually need to make this point? Pretty pathetic. We are talking hypotheticals and you have to ram home why the Stars would probably get the spot. As if you even have any insight at all into how such a decision would be made. What a turkey.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostGreat point. Only you should be allowed to speak and then you can just continue to create and control every single discussion. Yep, that works.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Well I see those two are at again. At least with P not signing in from his "vacation" he won't be able to go full tilt nutty with his 5 paragraph rants with multiple attacking quotes. Or maybe he can't help himself, we'll see and maybe those posts are coming.
Ok, seriously can't we for once keep on topic and debate the topics and ideas being brought up, instead of just talking about who is bringing them up???
Now as for promotion/relegation or no promotion/relegation ... I could probably be swayed either way. But I know I would really prefer a singular line of league hierarchy for all teams instead of the current duplication we have all over the place.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostGood one Perspective. Can you give me a hint how long you are going to be taking over the forum? I really need to take a dump and I know as long as you are here nobody else will get a word in edge wise.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWell I see those two are at again. At least with P not signing in from his "vacation" he won't be able to go full tilt nutty with his 5 paragraph rants with multiple attacking quotes. Or maybe he can't help himself, we'll see and maybe those posts are coming.
Ok, seriously can't we for once keep on topic and debate the topics and ideas being brought up, instead of just talking about who is bringing them up???
- Quote
Comment
Comment