Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2013-2014 Boys U11 Top Teams (MA)
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo who should be in Div 1/Blue in the Spring?
- Quote
Comment
-
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe second and third teams of clubs are usually players whose parents have seen them play on third or fourth level town teams and feel that their kid is not being challenged enough and much better than the rest (so, it's relative). So, they tryout for a club team and are placed on a lower team. These parents probably see the rest of the lower team as subpar compared to their own kid and definitely welcome a guest player or two for games. After all, this guest player emulates what this parent thinks his or her own kid should be executing.
And why, with the same coaches and programs within a club, they are not executing is the question these parents should be facing. It's the lower level teams that improve without the guest players that are actually developing and this reflects good coaching. This is what parents should be looking at. Winning or losing streaks are not reflective of this because you can't control the order of the teams you play. Hence, the scam with club soccer.
Some of these posts over the last couple of pages seem way off to me. Parents want their kids to play, period. Doesn't matter if it's at a regional event, DAP or ECNL, Region 1, a club's C or D team, or in town soccer. 99% of parents are not going to want guest players if that means their kid is going to play significantly less. We're talking U11, right??!!! Most parents would trade a win for an extra 20 minutes of play time for their kids any day. From a business point of view, clubs (and I think this is most of them) screw up by having too many kids on rosters for a few extra dollars while alienating major portions of their customer base. That's part of the reason this entire idea about the club's being huge businesses seems so silly to me. In other words, to use the words apparently love here, club soccer would be more of a "scam" if more of the customers were happy.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by perspective View PostWould you mind explaining how your last sentence follows from the rest of post? I was following you, and then, bam, seems like gratuitously tossed in something unrelated just to get a rise.
Some of these posts over the last couple of pages seem way off to me. Parents want their kids to play, period. Doesn't matter if it's at a regional event, DAP or ECNL, Region 1, a club's C or D team, or in town soccer. 99% of parents are not going to want guest players if that means their kid is going to play significantly less. We're talking U11, right??!!! Most parents would trade a win for an extra 20 minutes of play time for their kids any day. From a business point of view, clubs (and I think this is most of them) screw up by having too many kids on rosters for a few extra dollars while alienating major portions of their customer base. That's part of the reason this entire idea about the club's being huge businesses seems so silly to me. In other words, to use the words apparently love here, club soccer would be more of a "scam" if more of the customers were happy.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOccasional club pass players won't anger parents. Mass influx will cause upheaval. I don't expect, or suspect, that many clubs would try something like that anyway.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOccasional club pass players won't anger parents. Mass influx will cause upheaval. I don't expect, or suspect, that many clubs would try something like that anyway.
Flip the discussion 180, I would definitely not want a player that is below the level of our team to use the club pass unless it prevented a forfeit.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAs a club parent of a level 2 player, I would not mind one or two guys coming down to help with the ball movement. But those players should not play the majority of the minutes.
Flip the discussion 180, I would definitely not want a player that is below the level of our team to use the club pass unless it prevented a forfeit.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBased on current results, looks like Valeo, Strikers, NU, Ocean State, PTUSA and then one other team. Right now that might be Liverpool or FC Mass, based on their performances. I suppose you could make a case for Spartans too and make it an 8 team division, but then you are starting to stretch.
That hardly puts you in MAPLE Division 1.
The rest of the way they play 4 of the bottom 5 teams and Valeo. They'll end up 7-1-1 by default, but they won't have played anyone.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostStrikers beat a team that should be moved to the Purple division. THEN, they beat a team that ACTUALLY got moved, by MAPLE, to the Purple division. They squeaked by Hammer by a goal. Then they tied Spartans.
That hardly puts you in MAPLE Division 1.
The rest of the way they play 4 of the bottom 5 teams and Valeo. They'll end up 7-1-1 by default, but they won't have played anyone.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAnd they lost to WU by one goal, one of the two best teams in the state.
What's your point?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe same point could be made for WUP, which has really only played weak teams as well. I would hardly call them one of the two best teams in the state.
- Quote
Comment
Comment