Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alex Morgan does it again

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Beckham is a man whore but this pig was completely nude and you have NO IDEA who did the painting, so take your "probably" and stuff it.
    Morgan knows she is part of an issue that men ********** on and she did it anyway. She is going to burn in hell.
    You sound like the flamer, actually. But as we keep telling, you can't think with that little thing. That's not what it is for.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Beckham is a man whore but this pig was completely nude and you have NO IDEA who did the painting, so take your "probably" and stuff it.
      Morgan knows she is part of an issue that men ********** on and she did it anyway. She is going to burn in hell.
      You seriously need help

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Would you like your little girl to get naked and have people paint on her? Is Madonna a strong, confident woman too? She has done wonders for the way women are viewed. Cheap little pig is right. Shame on her and her family.
        Shame on you and your family. I find you and those that think like you to be much more replulsive than Morgan, Madona or Beckham.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          You sound like the flamer, actually. But as we keep telling, you can't think with that little thing. That's not what it is for.
          Exactly. Unless, of course, it's not a guy at all, but one of the women who loves the current power grid. If it is a guy, that loser needs to see if he can think with his teeny tiny brain instead. Feel very sorry for any female he thinks he has ownership of.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            oh puleese; shame on you! As the previous poster said, you can't see anything. I'll bet she had one person (probably a woman, do the painting, and in private). You almost sound like a misogynist. You probably think Beckham in only his underwear during Superbowl half time was acceptable.
            You can't see anything. Then why not just wear a bathing suit???

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              You can't see anything. Then why not just wear a bathing suit???
              Because sex sells and Morgan is selling sex. I think prostitution should be legalized too. Don't you?

              Comment


                #37
                Porn - the crack cocaine of the genitals.

                Comment


                  #38
                  I think the answer is...because it's titillating to know that she's not wearing anything.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    You can't see anything. Then why not just wear a bathing suit???
                    Good question, however the current trend in society, especially regarding young people, is self expression using tatoos, piercings, and in this case' " body art ".

                    This is a rather current trend, as in the past the accomplishments and deeds of the person seemed to be enough , but that has changed.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Good question, however the current trend in society, especially regarding young people, is self expression using tatoos, piercings, and in this case' " body art ".

                      This is a rather current trend, as in the past the accomplishments and deeds of the person seemed to be enough , but that has changed.
                      This was not a decision made by youth as part of a "trend". It was a decision made by businessmen trying to sell a product to a predominantly male audience. Don't be so follish to rationalize it any other way.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        * foolish

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          This was not a decision made by youth as part of a "trend". It was a decision made by businessmen trying to sell a product to a predominantly male audience. Don't be so follish to rationalize it any other way.
                          I said, " young people", not youth. If you don't think she had any say regarding what she would be " wearing" , maybe you know more than I do.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            I said, " young people", not youth. If you don't think she had any say regarding what she would be " wearing" , maybe you know more than I do.
                            Young people, youth, strictly semantics. The fact still remains the same. The decision was made by businessmen trying to sell a product to a predominantly male audience. Morgan agreeing to it doesn't change that one iota. In fact, it may just prove that she got sucked in by men wanting to use her body to make them a buck. So I will repeat myself, don't be so foolish to rationalize it any other way.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Young people, youth, strictly semantics. The fact still remains the same. The decision was made by businessmen trying to sell a product to a predominantly male audience. Morgan agreeing to it doesn't change that one iota. In fact, it may just prove that she got sucked in by men wanting to use her body to make them a buck. So I will repeat myself, don't be so foolish to rationalize it any other way.
                              No different than prostitution. The whore makes money and so does the pimp. What's wrong with that?

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Last time I checked prostitution was illegal

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X