Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Coachability

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Coachability

    This is a pretty good article as it addresses some of the topics that appear in this forum. I believe, but haven't yet confirmed, the author to be Gianni Mininni who grew up playing soccer in Italy: http://www.coachgianni.com/about_me.html

    The greatest characteristic of a soccer player is his Coachability


    In reorganizing my soccer material, I have tons of articles and notes, I found an important note. Strangely, even if I’m very organized, this time I don’t have the source of this material.

    So, if a coach in reading this article, recognize his concepts, please don’t be angry at me. If you let me know, I’ll give you all the credit, by publishing your name and references.

    Coachability.

    What a weird word. In my note I wrote:

    Is this player coachable?
    Want to listen and learn?
    Why waste time on an uncooperative individual?

    Very often we give too much importance to talent. Clearly it’s important but, considering that no one is perfect, even the talented players have to get better and be at the service of the team. What can you teach to players who don’t want to listen, don’t want to learn and don’t want to cooperate?

    Every team I have coached in my life, boys or girls, men or women, always have the same constant characteristic. They always have one ‘virus‘. When they have two, I call it a ’cancer’.

    Viruses, are talented players who are always late, very often absent because they prefer to play on other teams, don’t listen to the coaches, never accept constructive criticism or corrections, never try to get better, always look away when you talk with them, never say “Hi, coach.â€￾, coming or going away from the field and, in his or her opinion, never makes mistakes. The others have to win the ball back. The others go back and defend. They are the stars. Even more if he or she are the keepers.

    If you have 1 on your team, you can cure it (the team not the virus), but if you have 2 of them, and you don’t do anything, your team has to die.

    Arrigo Sacchi always said that the greatest characteristic of a champion is ’humility’. How can we not agree with this?

    So, if you have a ‘virus’ or worse, a ‘cancer’ on your team, and you do have it, (if you say no, you’re just pretending not to see it), I strongly suggest to eliminate them before they, he or she, infects the whole team.

    This having been said, lets go back to ’Coachability‘ and see what makes an athlete an individual with whom it’s a pleasure to work.

    In my notes I wrote:

    Athletic ability.
    Technical ability.
    Ability to make teammates better.
    Ability to make an impact on the team.
    Being a winner.

    Athletic ability

    A soccer player, at any age or sex, has to be fit! Continuously going back and forth, in suggesting, defending, supporting, pressing and not being exhausted after 10 minutes of this. How many players like this do we have on our teams? Not too many!

    This means that a ‘Coachable’ player works by himself. Runs every day 20/30 minutes. Does the ’shuttle’ , 5/10/15/20/25 yards (back and forth) in less than 35 seconds. 5 times, with a minute rest each time.

    Sprint 10 yards, 5 times back and forth, in less than 11 seconds. 5 times with 30 seconds rest, every time.

    Speed ladders, the following exercises 4 times each, plus sprinting trough 6 cones set in a zigzag path, 10 yards apart:

    Fast sprint through the steps, raising the knees high.
    Jump with the feet together every step, without flex the legs or touching the heels to the ground.
    Jump inside and outside skipping one step every time, legs straight, without touching the heels on the ground.
    Fast steps from the side. Left in, right in, left out, right out, go next step, repeat.
    As I said, at the end of the latter, put 6 cones 10 yards apart and sprint in a zigzag through them left and right every time after the above exercises. Jog gently back to the letter and restart.

    Technical ability

    Even Ronaldinho, can improve his touch so, all the ‘coachable’ players, have to do foot work for handling the ball with their feet like they are able to do with their hands! 50/60% of the players, if not more, are unable to juggle. You don’t believe me? Try the next practice and see how many of your players are able to juggle 10 times consecutively with both feet. This is unacceptable. I’ve seen hundreds of practices. How much time is dedicated to juggling? None!

    Why? Because the ‘spoiled’ kids get frustrated, not being able to do it! And their parents too! They need to have fun, not get better and try to become soccer players. So let them play, have fun, and never learn anything.

    The Ability to make your teammate better

    Did you ever play tennis with someone that is ‘horrible‘ (that means, never sends a ball back)? If yes, you know that it makes you look ‘horrible’ too. But when we play tennis with someone really good, who send balls with the right power, with the right rebound, we just put the racket there, and the ball goes back as if we were Agassi!

    It’s the same in soccer. A “Coachable’ player makes good passes in the space and makes the teammate’s job, very easy. They almost don’t even need to control the ball but just follow it. Communications like ’man on’, ‘turn’, or ’go’, gives them a confidence like having 2 pairs of eyes. One in front and one behind. We have to be their eyes behind!

    Give them a good assist so they have only to push the ball in the net with their foot or their head.

    Support them in going in to the right spot so they can reach you with an easy pass, instead of forcing them to dribble, because no one is unmarked, and probably loose the ball.

    The ability to make an impact on the team

    The ‘Coachable’ players, when they have the ball, on rotation, are the play makers. They have to be the leaders. On rotation, all the players carry the team on their shoulders. Clearly this depends a lot on their individual characters. For some it’s more natural to do this, but if only 2 or 3 players do this, when they are not there, the team will collapse without their guidance.

    Being a winner

    Please don’t misunderstand me. I don’t want to put a lot of emphasis on winning. To do our best is already a ‘victory’ independent of the score. But this, very often, generates the opposing misunderstanding.

    Because we don’t put the correct emphasis on winning, little by little, it becomes unimportant.

    The meaning of every game, soccer in particular, is to win the game. If we take away the ‘deep meaning’ of a competition, we negate the existence of the competition itself. I repeat: a soccer game, is a competition between 2 teams, that act in order to win the game. Too often, the absence of this attitude is the excuse not to make the maximum effort for reaching the final goal. That goal is to win the game. Not at any cost, but fighting in trying!

    Coachability.

    Lets all try to look more for this aspect, when we have to judge and choose soccer players at the try-outs. We need to talk with them, not only look at them. Do they have good skills? Very good. Now look to see if you can work with him or her.

    In trying to make them REAL soccer players, it’s fundamental for the coaches, that the players are coachable.
    Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment.

    #2
    You might find "Learning through pictures" on Mininni's web site of interest:

    http://www.coachgianni.com/through_pictures.html

    Here's one example. Check out this picture of Abby Wambach going in on Norwegian (?) keeper, Nordby and what he has to say:

    http://www.coachgianni.com/learn_tho...gallery-20.jpg

    "Try to always keep your eyes open........

    ......I’m talking about safety, entering this way against a goalie, could be very bad for him.

    Eyes closed.

    Clearly late on the ball.

    Knee flexed ready to hit.

    Full speed instead of slowing down.

    Can you imagine a more dangerous situation?

    So, eyes open and always jump the goalie when he comes towards you."


    http://www.coachgianni.com/learn_tho...gallery-10.jpg

    "Just a suggestion for the goalie. Never lie on top of the ball on the ground. If someone falls on you, the ball can hurt your ribs or internal organs.

    Respect the goalie’s safety, even if the impact is negative for you."
    Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment.

    Comment


      #3
      Not to defend Wambach's physical play, but you could probably get a photo like this of every top striker in the world, male or female. Also, single photos can deceive, with regard to angle, velocity, situation, even eyes closed (was she caught midblink?).

      That said, I thought Coach Mininni's comments were very interesting -- thanks, FSM.

      Here's another recent article, involving Wambach, on Natasha Kai (link: http://www.womensprosoccer.com/newsitem_ektid2246.aspx).

      Kai comes back strong

      Friday, March 28, 2008
      By: Karyn Lush | womensprosoccer.com

      (March 28, 2008) – This wasn’t the way that Natasha Kai wanted to start 2008.

      Her family traveled to Southern California to celebrate Christmas with her and that was when Kai began experiencing the symptoms: shortness of breath, a bit of fatigue and a cough that she just could not shake. Still she continued to train. National Team camp opened on January 3 and with a new coach in Pia Sundhage at the helm, Kai, like the rest of her teammates, wanted to impress.

      The day camp began Kai visited the doctor and received the bad news: She had bronchitis. Unable to participate with her teammates on the field, Kai returned to her home state of Hawaii when the National Team departed to China for the Four Nations Tournament. She began to feel better, but then had a relapse which pulled her off the field again. For two weeks, Kai didn’t touch a soccer ball, run a sprint or lift a weight.

      Fully healthy, but still lagging in fitness and general comfort on the field, Kai returned to the National Team for its mega-camp at The Home Depot Center in Carson, Calif. in February. It was a jagged p ill to swallow.

      “Training back at home and then coming into California and training are two completely opposite things,â€￾ said the 24-year-old forward. “You’re going 100% with all these girls. You catch up slowly.â€￾

      But catch up, Kai did. She was named to the U.S. roster for the Algarve Cup, held in March in Portugal. After coming off the bench and notching an assist in the USA’s opening 4-0 victory over China, Kai did not see any playing time against Italy. A start and a goal against Norway followed before Kai had a hand in both U.S. goals, registering a goal and an assist, in a 2-1 tournament-winning victory over Denmark.

      “I think I came back strong,â€￾ Kai said. “I played the way I like to play.â€￾

      The games in Portugal were her first under Sundhage. Kai believes she and her teammates thrived at the Algarve Cup under the passionate Swede’s tutelage.

      “Every time we step out on the field, we give 110% and it showed every game,â€￾ said Kai. “It showed that we were there, we were committed under our new coach. She believes in us and that makes us happy and play harder. When we score, she’s excited and that makes us excited. It makes us want to score even more. I think our overall performance was amazing. We had some tough games but we just got through them and continued to trust each other and we knew that we had each others’ backs.â€￾

      Now Kai finds herself in a three-way battle with two of her teammates to win one starting spot, the position up top opposite Abby Wambach in Sundhage’s 4-4-2. With Heather O’Reilly and Lindsay Tarpley both shifting to midfield, Kai’s competi tion figures to consist of a pair of collegians: Amy Rodriguez, who led the University of Southern California to the 2007 NCAA ti tle as a junior, and Lauren Cheney, the runner-up in the 2007 MAC Hermann Trophy voting as a sophomore.

      “If it’s me, that would be great,â€￾ Kai said. “If it’s Amy or Cheney, I would be so happy for them. It’s whoever connects with Abby, whoever connects the best with her and whoever she feels more comfortable with playing beside her. [That player is] going to win that spot. It’s still up for grabs and anyone could take it, but we’re all good for that spot and we’re all here for a reason.â€￾

      Kai offers a hunger for the goal and unpredictability, but with just 39 caps is still a relatively young player. Every time she trains with Wambach, who owns 112 caps and 89 goals, Kai learns something new – how to execute a run more precisely, the effort to exhibit on defense and the way to take a professional foul. This past week in training at The Home Depot center, she has often been paired with Wambach and says the two are connecting well as the U.S. prepares for CONCACAF Olympic Qualifying in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico from April 2-12.

      “These next couple of days are going to be crunch time,â€￾ Kai said. “But at the end of the day, I think we’ve been connecting really well and we’ll just see what happens.â€￾

      Kai hopes her future includes not only helping the U.S. punch its ticket to the Olympics but also traveling to Beijing in August for the Games.

      “It would mean a lot, not just for me, but for the whole team, for all of the young players who haven’t experienced it,â€￾ she said. “It would be great to represent my country and play alongside of these wonderful women here.â€￾

      And competing in the Olympics would make Kai all but forget her unfortunate start to the year.

      Karyn Lush is a regular contributor to womensprosoccer.com and can be reached at karyn.lush@womensprosoccer.com.
      It's hard to argue with 89 goals in 112 caps -- not even Michelle Akers had such a high ratio of goals to games played.

      Comment


        #4
        It's hard to argue with 89 goals in 112 caps -- not even Michelle Akers had such a high ratio of goals to games played.
        Akers would have gotten that many had the team been trained to "Get it to Michelle".

        Comment


          #5
          I didn't mean to direct attention to Abby Wambach. I was thinking more in line with safety issues on the field and the fact that the coach was making more than one point about safety in that link I provided. However, since Abby was brought up, I did a little research.


          Originally posted by Anonymous
          It's hard to argue with 89 goals in 112 caps -- not even Michelle Akers had such a high ratio of goals to games played.
          Akers would have gotten that many had the team been trained to "Get it to Michelle".
          Akers is currently the second highest goal scorer for the US (Mia Hamm is #1).

          http://www.soccertimes.com/usteams/rost ... /akers.htm

          1991, was her biggest year. She was playing center forward and earned the Golden Boot Award at the 91 WWC. She scored 39 goals in 26 games that year. In 1996 she was moved to center mid where her goal output diminished to just 20 goals over the remainder of her career, retiring in 2000, but her stats at retirement were 105 goals in 153 games.

          To put this in some perspective, Hamm scored 127 goals in 215 games before her retirement. Her assist record is 104 for a total of 358 points. Akers was 105 goals, 37 assists for a total of 247 points. I can't seem to find the number of assists and points Abby currently has, but I believe her assist record is going up under Sundhage.
          Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by FSM
            I didn't mean to direct attention to Abby Wambach. I was thinking more in line with safety issues on the field and the fact that the coach was making more than one point about safety in that link I provided.
            Sorry FSM, I didn't mean to hijack the thread by posting the article about Natasha Kai. The safety issues are so important -- many of us have witnessed, or heard stories about, horrific collisions between strikers and keepers. As a soccer parent, it's something that has often worried me.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by FSM
              I didn't mean to direct attention to Abby Wambach. I was thinking more in line with safety issues on the field and the fact that the coach was making more than one point about safety in that link I provided. However, since Abby was brought up, I did a little research.


              Originally posted by Anonymous
              It's hard to argue with 89 goals in 112 caps -- not even Michelle Akers had such a high ratio of goals to games played.
              Akers would have gotten that many had the team been trained to "Get it to Michelle".
              Akers is currently the second highest goal scorer for the US (Mia Hamm is #1).

              http://www.soccertimes.com/usteams/rost ... /akers.htm

              1991, was her biggest year. She was playing center forward and earned the Golden Boot Award at the 91 WWC. She scored 39 goals in 26 games that year. In 1996 she was moved to center mid where her goal output diminished to just 20 goals over the remainder of her career, retiring in 2000, but her stats at retirement were 105 goals in 153 games.

              To put this in some perspective, Hamm scored 127 goals in 215 games before her retirement. Her assist record is 104 for a total of 358 points. Akers was 105 goals, 37 assists for a total of 247 points. I can't seem to find the number of assists and points Abby currently has, but I believe her assist record is going up under Sundhage.
              CM is equivalent to QB - the CM has (depending on formation) typically 8 players available to her when in possession of the ball. No other player has access typically to even half that amount. They are critical in transition, attack, counter attack, in controlling all three zones of the field. Your best all around player should be your CM. Without a dominant CM you have little chance of sustained success during a match or a season.

              Comment


                #8
                "CM is equivalent to QB - the CM has (depending on formation) typically 8 players available to her when in possession of the ball. No other player has access typically to even half that amount. They are critical in transition, attack, counter attack, in controlling all three zones of the field. Your best all around player should be your CM. Without a dominant CM you have little chance of sustained success during a match or a season."

                CM is usually the coach's kid.

                Comment


                  #9
                  A coach once told me that young players who play with their heads up, or for this discussion, their eyes open, tend to avoid contact because they see the contact coming. This can be interpreted as being afraid of the contact when it's actually pretty good field awareness.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Anonymous
                    A coach once told me that young players who play with their heads up, or for this discussion, their eyes open, tend to avoid contact because they see the contact coming. This can be interpreted as being afraid of the contact when it's actually pretty good field awareness.
                    As opposed to the player that never lifts their head and bulls their way through the opposition?

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I wonder if some coaches look at coachability in different ways? Certainly different personalities have different expectations? I ask because my U15 daughter has a new coach this year and has been struggling to "get" him, and I think vice versa. This is the first coach in 8 years that has not seemed to think that she is "coachable." (It was always one of the first comments on past evaluations - highly rated in this category). Is it maybe just a different style of play that he thinks she isn't getting (but she thinks she is and doesn't know how to connect with him)? Not really trying to get too specific, just wondering if others think coaches might have different standards for their players' coachability.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        P.S. She is a CM! But a real team player and I am sure would move around willingly if asked.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Anonymous
                          I wonder if some coaches look at coachability in different ways? Certainly different personalities have different expectations? I ask because my U15 daughter has a new coach this year and has been struggling to "get" him, and I think vice versa. This is the first coach in 8 years that has not seemed to think that she is "coachable." (It was always one of the first comments on past evaluations - highly rated in this category). Is it maybe just a different style of play that he thinks she isn't getting (but she thinks she is and doesn't know how to connect with him)? Not really trying to get too specific, just wondering if others think coaches might have different standards for their players' coachability.
                          Your kid is not as good as you think, get over it.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Anonymous
                            Originally posted by Anonymous
                            I wonder if some coaches look at coachability in different ways? Certainly different personalities have different expectations? I ask because my U15 daughter has a new coach this year and has been struggling to "get" him, and I think vice versa.
                            Your kid is not as good as you think, get over it.
                            Who said coaches don't post? ;)

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Anonymous
                              [Your kid is not as good as you think, get over it.
                              That is so rude, and so typical of this forum. A person asks an honest question about an interesting subject, interjecting their own kid's recent experience, and this is the response.

                              Why not offer some thoughts about how that coach's style might be different from other coaches, ask whether the kid "looks the coach in the eye" and some of the other items mentioned in the original post? Maybe the coach doesn't see the leadership skills in this player that other coaches did, and why might that be? Change in her demeanor, her relationships with other players, her overall attitude?

                              This is why parents don't dare ask questions and hope for meaningful advice on this forum, it's strictly a sh t-slinging fest.

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X