U12 Girls

There are many good players on all of the teams but the teams who have the depth are the top teams. What seperates WU, Fuller, and the Stars is depth on the bench. The Stars have the better quality players when it comes to Subs and that's why they've been succussful. As far as starting lineups I would give it to Western then Stars followed by Fuller. This why Western can play top teams closely when others cannot. They simply play their starters more than usual.

There are many good players on all of the teams but the teams who have the depth are the top teams. What seperates WU, Fuller, and the Stars is depth on the bench. The Stars have the better quality players when it comes to Subs and that's why they've been succussful. As far as starting lineups I would give it to Western then Stars followed by Fuller. This why Western can play top teams closely when others cannot. They simply play their starters more than usual.

Is this development? what about having 1 top player and they play the whole game. Does this help the team/coach or individual.

9 top players on the Stars? You wouldn't happen to be a Stars parent would you? If so, then perhaps you can tell me how many players currently on the #1 Nationally Ranked Stars United team were on the roster at U12.

Thursday was WU day.Friday was "lets jump on the Blachwatch player day". Today is "lets create Stars parents as targets".
TROLLS REALLY ARE STIRRING THE HORNETS NEST.
I hope the sane coaches and parents show common sense and don't make a big deal of any of this. The girls should just go out play,learn and enjoy themselves. I really hope this happen's.

This topic has more pages than the u15 Topic. If this age group can full fill half of what the u15's have, then the age group should be talked about. Right now "none" of the u12 teams have accomplished anything.

9 top players on the Stars? You wouldn't happen to be a Stars parent would you? If so, then perhaps you can tell me how many players currently on the #1 Nationally Ranked Stars United team were on the roster at U12.

"WAS" a Stars parent, couldn't tell you. Who cares?

Probably the parents of players who got cut.

This topic has more pages than the u15 Topic. If this age group can full fill half of what the u15's have, then the age group should be talked about. Right now "none" of the u12 teams have accomplished anything.

Not to mention none can stack up when they play beyond the borders of Mass. Overall the 12s in Mass are weak compared to years past.....

As of right now,


Stars have 9 top players
Western have 5
Fuller has 3
Scorpians have 3
Puma have 2
Explosion have 1
Blackwatch has 2
Berkshire has 1

This kind of mirror's the division table and is an indicator of where the balance of power is as of today(with the exception of BW). Its all about the rest of the players on each roster, on some teams there is a major drop of when substitions are made and this has a huge impact on results at this age. Also some starting 11's are stronger than others. Each team has stand out players for their age but to consistantly compete you need a solid roster.Each team is capable of beating each other, but if Stars start to lose some games that would be classed as a shock but if WU/Fuller/Scorps lose to each other it wouldn't be. Thats the recent history. So it doesn't matter who is the best individual because individuals can win games but sometimes they can't handle having to carry a team every week.

What team has the worst player based on your analysis?

As of right now,


Stars have 9 top players
Western have 5
Fuller has 3
Scorpians have 3
Puma have 2
Explosion have 1
Blackwatch has 2
Berkshire has 1

This kind of mirror's the division table and is an indicator of where the balance of power is as of today(with the exception of BW). Its all about the rest of the players on each roster, on some teams there is a major drop of when substitions are made and this has a huge impact on results at this age. Also some starting 11's are stronger than others. Each team has stand out players for their age but to consistantly compete you need a solid roster.Each team is capable of beating each other, but if Stars start to lose some games that would be classed as a shock but if WU/Fuller/Scorps lose to each other it wouldn't be. Thats the recent history. So it doesn't matter who is the best individual because individuals can win games but sometimes they can't handle having to carry a team every week.

But WU has more ODP players than that, shouldn't they all be in your top players list? The state coaches think they're the best, and they play up too! And why didn't all 9 of the Stars players go for ODP? Don't they know they're the best? Their coach knows he's the best! And Blackwatch actually has more than 1 player? Who would've thunk it! I can't believe that Scorpions and Fuller actually are getting any credit for having any players at all. Aren't they just big lugs who just kick the ball? And by the way who said that Puma, Explosion and Berkshire could get in on this thread?

Well, that about sums up this idiotic, superficial, self serving, piece of crap thread. Good Day!

As of right now,


Stars have 9 top players
Western have 5
Fuller has 3
Scorpians have 3
Puma have 2
Explosion have 1
Blackwatch has 2
Berkshire has 1

This kind of mirror's the division table and is an indicator of where the balance of power is as of today(with the exception of BW). Its all about the rest of the players on each roster, on some teams there is a major drop of when substitions are made and this has a huge impact on results at this age. Also some starting 11's are stronger than others. Each team has stand out players for their age but to consistantly compete you need a solid roster.Each team is capable of beating each other, but if Stars start to lose some games that would be classed as a shock but if WU/Fuller/Scorps lose to each other it wouldn't be. Thats the recent history. So it doesn't matter who is the best individual because individuals can win games but sometimes they can't handle having to carry a team every week.

But WU has more ODP players than that, shouldn't they all be in your top players list? The state coaches think they're the best, and they play up too! And why didn't all 9 of the Stars players go for ODP? Don't they know they're the best? Their coach knows he's the best! And Blackwatch actually has more than 1 player? Who would've thunk it! I can't believe that Scorpions and Fuller actually are getting any credit for having any players at all. Aren't they just big lugs who just kick the ball? And by the way who said that Puma, Explosion and Berkshire could get in on this thread?

Well, that about sums up this idiotic, superficial, self serving, piece of crap thread. Good Day!

Its just a troll that takes pleasure in causing troblesome situations between coaches/players and parents. Just ignore them.

As of right now,


Stars have 9 top players
Western have 5
Fuller has 3
Scorpians have 3
Puma have 2
Explosion have 1
Blackwatch has 2
Berkshire has 1

This kind of mirror's the division table and is an indicator of where the balance of power is as of today(with the exception of BW). Its all about the rest of the players on each roster, on some teams there is a major drop of when substitions are made and this has a huge impact on results at this age. Also some starting 11's are stronger than others. Each team has stand out players for their age but to consistantly compete you need a solid roster.Each team is capable of beating each other, but if Stars start to lose some games that would be classed as a shock but if WU/Fuller/Scorps lose to each other it wouldn't be. Thats the recent history. So it doesn't matter who is the best individual because individuals can win games but sometimes they can't handle having to carry a team every week.

But WU has more ODP players than that, shouldn't they all be in your top players list? The state coaches think they're the best, and they play up too! And why didn't all 9 of the Stars players go for ODP? Don't they know they're the best? Their coach knows he's the best! And Blackwatch actually has more than 1 player? Who would've thunk it! I can't believe that Scorpions and Fuller actually are getting any credit for having any players at all. Aren't they just big lugs who just kick the ball? And by the way who said that Puma, Explosion and Berkshire could get in on this thread?

Well, that about sums up this idiotic, superficial, self serving, piece of crap thread. Good Day!

Its just a troll that takes pleasure in causing troblesome situations between coaches/players and parents. Just ignore them.

Ahhhh, hello, I believe the poster was being sarcastic! Lighten up!

Does anyone have a child from this age group in the ODP pool. This age is playing up so I have questions.

How many u13's made the pool?
Do the u12's hold their own?
Have the State Coaches been at the sessions?
What has the session content been?
Does your child enjoy the sessions?
Are they comparable to you club sessions?

Does anyone have a child from this age group in the ODP pool. This age is playing up so I have questions.

How many u13's made the pool?
Do the u12's hold their own?
Have the State Coaches been at the sessions?
What has the session content been?
Does your child enjoy the sessions?
Are they comparable to you club sessions?

Why are you assuming that these U-12's are "playing up"? Fall of 95 birthdays are age approprite to be in the 95 ODP pool. I've heard this before on the board and I just don't get it. For example are all the Western United girls 96 birthdays? If not please stop telling us how they are all playing up on ODP.

Does anyone have a child from this age group in the ODP pool. This age is playing up so I have questions.

How many u13's made the pool?
Do the u12's hold their own?
Have the State Coaches been at the sessions?
What has the session content been?
Does your child enjoy the sessions?
Are they comparable to you club sessions?

They may not be playing up. It is a Jan. 1 date. NOT the MAPLE date.

I'm curious, I notice that there are 9 teams in the u12 Blue division. Does that mean there will be 8 games? Or, will each team not play someone? It could make a difference in the standings if that is what happens.

I'm curious, I notice that there are 9 teams in the u12 Blue division. Does that mean there will be 8 games? Or, will each team not play someone? It could make a difference in the standings if that is what happens.

Thats exactly what's going to happen. It will have a bearing because the top 4 in Blue don't play the first weekend of round robin.