Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do the KKK & White Supremacists vote Republican?
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostA leader- not THE leader
do you deny he is very powerful and influential ? i made no disparaging comment about the mans history - you simply took offense to facts
He's done more for Civil Rights than Scvvvvvmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for Black and Brown People than Scvvvmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for low income/proverty stricken community people than Scvvvvmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for the advancement of Colored people than Scvvvvmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for standing up for police BRUTALITY than sCVVVVMBAG Trump or Hammity.
And Yes he's waaaaaay more honest and Religious than Scvvvvmbag Trump or Hammity.
So yeah so i dont have a problem with the guy because he feels like America termed his class of people as 2nd class citizens, so if what he said is " NO No No not God Bless a America, God Damn America" then he has his 1st amendment right to be frustrated after seeing his race and Color for decades hanged by rope, raped , bought and sold into slavery and been abused by law Enforcement.
Have a good Sunday, you need it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHe's done more for America by defending it in the Military than Scvvvmmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for Civil Rights than Scvvvvvmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for Black and Brown People than Scvvvmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for low income/proverty stricken community people than Scvvvvmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for the advancement of Colored people than Scvvvvmbag Trump or Hammity
He's done more for standing up for police BRUTALITY than sCVVVVMBAG Trump or Hammity.
And Yes he's waaaaaay more honest and Religious than Scvvvvmbag Trump or Hammity.
So yeah so i dont have a problem with the guy because he feels like America termed his class of people as 2nd class citizens, so if what he said is " NO No No not God Bless a America, God Damn America" then he has his 1st amendment right to be frustrated after seeing his race and Color for decades hanged by rope, raped , bought and sold into slavery and been abused by law Enforcement.
Have a good Sunday, you need it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Clown Trump now “warning” television networks that a Biden presidency will be “boring” and “bad for their ratings.”
How much lower does this go?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Jared Kushner in April, when the death toll was 59,000: We’re on the “other side of the medical aspect” and it’s all been a huge success.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostClown Trump now “warning” television networks that a Biden presidency will be “boring” and “bad for their ratings.”
How much lower does this go?
Right now Americans would appreciate some presidential boredom - someone who just gets the job done, doesn't rage tweet all day long. That would be nice.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTrump would know about ratings - he only ran to boost his own sagging ratings and get a better deal from NBC
Right now Americans would appreciate some presidential boredom - someone who just gets the job done, doesn't rage tweet all day long. That would be nice.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThey had thoughtful independent decisions....exactly what I want. Not a rubber stamp liberal like Ginsburg. Don’t you feel like an idiot now decrying how trumps picks were the devil and the world would end if they were approved?
Kavanaugh has pretty much voted like his history.
While they voted technically 'against Trump' on the tax issue, read the decision instead of relying on the media's knee jerk reaction. It was a no brainer that the President isn't "above the law", but all the justices gave wiggle room for either a GOP or DEM president by essentially saying the lower courts have to review each reason for their own merits (no broad fishing expedition even if there is some smoke) and especially related to congress that it needs to be well supported by other evidence to justify getting into any President's personal stuff in order to keep a balance of power.
In other words, yes, the President isn't above the law, but relative to most of us he (or she) kind of is so don't take this as (1) it's a slam dunk he'll have to release his tax records and (2) congress can't just cook up an investigation under its broad oversight and say it gives them the right to ask for stuff not protected under executive privilege.
Trump was kind of right when it said it was a win because the SCOTUS could have said yep, release the records - basically they said "it's possible, but it's a pretty high standard so go back and fight it out in the lower court again or try again Congress with a better case." Trump is going to run out the clock at least before Nov.
The OP is right - the Dem justices are more lockstep (like Thomas and Alito on the right) - Roberts is way more political - maybe being Chief Justice and knowing the court's legacy is named for you during your period makes them all that way..
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The Logical Voice
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIDK, I can't speak for others but.
can you explain why Biden supported segregation?
can you explain why Biden called a mayor a nigger while he was addressing congress?
Why did a democrat kill Lincoln?
Why did a democrat kill JFK?
Why did a democrat kill MLK?
Why did a democrat kill Malcome X?
Why did democrats support Slavery?
Why did democrats creat Jim Crow laws?
Why did the democrats create the KKK?
Why did the democrats create the confederacy?
And why do democrats label republicans as racist?
Why do you continue to ignore the evolution of the principles of the Democrat and Republican parties in the last 154 years?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The Logical Voice
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postof course they blame president Trump
the southern poverty law center is a far left leaning organization which hasnt backed any republican in the last 25 years
So when others make the same claim about far right leaning organizations, we should disregard them as you do the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Are you saying because an organization has a conservative or liberal perspective that they have no credibility?
What organizations does that leave?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo when others make the same claim about far right leaning organizations, we should disregard them as you do the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Are you saying because an organization has a conservative or liberal perspective that they have no credibility?
What organizations does that leave?
the go to for your side is the SPLC and they seem to have a political bent
i really wish we can get away from the politics all the time - and just get real useful info
the news business has the same issue- no real news- just politics BS
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The Logical Voice
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postno - there are organizations on both sides that i think we can agree are not great
the go to for your side is the SPLC and they seem to have a political bent
i really wish we can get away from the politics all the time - and just get real useful info
the news business has the same issue- no real news- just politics BS
But this is caused principally by the rise of cable news and the need to fill it with 24 hours of programming. These organizations cannot fill that time by reporting news. The do it by discussing, analyzing and tearing at every news item with all their pundits. That fills hours of air time and gets millions of advertising dollars.
Ted Turner was a visionary with his first step in cable news. I don't think he envisioned how this would morph over the last 30 years.
PIck your network...all of them are filled with self-appointed experts who do little other than pontificate their ideology through news events. From MSNBC, CNN, FNC, FBC, to OANN, it's all the same. They pick and choose their experts to ensure the slant they want and when it goes wrong, they simply cut away. Tons of three minute experts out there....lol.
There are some people in there worth listening to and watching. I think Maddow is a smart person. Mike Wallace on Fox. Sam Shepard. I hear a real thought coming most times from Dana Perino and poor Juan stuck on The Five.
My current laugh is reserved for the morning show Fox and Friends. I love how they all site in their separate studios and rant about how kids should all be in school together.
I think the best chances we have for real news now is BBC America, NPR and foreign news services.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOn this we agree.
But this is caused principally by the rise of cable news and the need to fill it with 24 hours of programming. These organizations cannot fill that time by reporting news. The do it by discussing, analyzing and tearing at every news item with all their pundits. That fills hours of air time and gets millions of advertising dollars.
Ted Turner was a visionary with his first step in cable news. I don't think he envisioned how this would morph over the last 30 years.
PIck your network...all of them are filled with self-appointed experts who do little other than pontificate their ideology through news events. From MSNBC, CNN, FNC, FBC, to OANN, it's all the same. They pick and choose their experts to ensure the slant they want and when it goes wrong, they simply cut away. Tons of three minute experts out there....lol.
There are some people in there worth listening to and watching. I think Maddow is a smart person. Mike Wallace on Fox. Sam Shepard. I hear a real thought coming most times from Dana Perino and poor Juan stuck on The Five.
My current laugh is reserved for the morning show Fox and Friends. I love how they all site in their separate studios and rant about how kids should all be in school together.
I think the best chances we have for real news now is BBC America, NPR and foreign news services.
i just want straight news
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postpoor juan has a job at Fox because he was fired for not towing the company line at another network
i just want straight news
You'll have to probably toss in Bloomberg, Politico, and the other similar organizations, conservative or liberal.
That pretty much leaves you with BBC, NPR and the basic news hows on the CBC, NBC and ABC networks. More straight news, but nothing in depth.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWell, then you have to stop watching Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, OANN for starters. None of those cable networks provide straight news.
You'll have to probably toss in Bloomberg, Politico, and the other similar organizations, conservative or liberal.
That pretty much leaves you with BBC, NPR and the basic news hows on the CBC, NBC and ABC networks. More straight news, but nothing in depth.
the best is to watch a Trump speech then watch how CNN describes what you just watched live
- Quote
Comment
Comment