Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

[Guest]

Not the OP

don’t forget Tucker’s employers told the courts he is unworthy of actually being believed

OUCH!

Even Tucker himself admitted he lies from time to time

[Guest]

again ,he didnt write the text, his wife did
he is not adjudicating a case involving Mark meadows or Ginny Thomas
didnt seem to be a problem for CT at all- he heard the case,he dissented and that was that

Yet...There will be multiple future cases around Jan 6th. As it is he was the only dissenting vote in the PA election case, but I'm sure it was just a coincidence right?

What's more pathetic is their claim the two of them keep their "professional lives" completely separate (what exactly is her "job" anyway?). Spouses talk. Think he didn't know she was helping organize rides to Jan 6th or that she was there? Think she wasn't distraught the night of Jan 6th? How was your day dear? Lol

[Guest]

Even Tucker himself admitted he lies from time to time

CT vet doing good -
US Army veteran who has volunteered to fight in Ukraine says he amps himself up for battle by thinking about 'punchable' Tucker Carlson


https://www.businessinsider.com/ukra...-battle-2022-3

[Guest]

CT vet doing good -
US Army veteran who has volunteered to fight in Ukraine says he amps himself up for battle by thinking about 'punchable' Tucker Carlson


https://www.businessinsider.com/ukra...-battle-2022-3

Now that's funny

Slava Ukraina

[Guest]

Yet...There will be multiple future cases around Jan 6th. As it is he was the only dissenting vote in the PA election case, but I'm sure it was just a coincidence right?

What's more pathetic is their claim the two of them keep their "professional lives" completely separate (what exactly is her "job" anyway?). Spouses talk. Think he didn't know she was helping organize rides to Jan 6th or that she was there? Think she wasn't distraught the night of Jan 6th? How was your day dear? Lol

the Penn case was not about Jan 6th but about the Gov of Penn changing election laws against the constitution of the state that only allows election laws to be changed by the legislature
this was all done BEFORE the election even took place in OCT 2020
texts after the election had no bearing

[Guest]

<<the qualifications for the job are written in the Constitution>> which constitution are you talking about ? It certainly isn't the US Constitution, Boris

exactly- there are no real qualifications written into our founding documents- so again how could one be less qualified than another?

thanks for proven the point

[Guest]

I think having a former right-wing president who lied and lied and lied and lied and.... etc --->∞. is the most dangerous... the wrongy Righty Method

i have not discussed my sons business dealings with him ever- is that true?
i have not met with any of my sons business partners - is that true ?
there is not one scintilla of evidence in the laptop, is that true?

i wonder if Joe is still getting his payments ?

[Guest]

Yet...There will be multiple future cases around Jan 6th. As it is he was the only dissenting vote in the PA election case, but I'm sure it was just a coincidence right?

What's more pathetic is their claim the two of them keep their "professional lives" completely separate (what exactly is her "job" anyway?). Spouses talk. Think he didn't know she was helping organize rides to Jan 6th or that she was there? Think she wasn't distraught the night of Jan 6th? How was your day dear? Lol

it takes a lot for a case to go to the Supreme court never mind one that gets accepted
so far there are no cases- but one I can definitely see getting there is the 6th amendment cases for the people who are still locked up
some of them will definitely push that angle

[Guest]

it takes a lot for a case to go to the Supreme court never mind one that gets accepted
so far there are no cases- but one I can definitely see getting there is the 6th amendment cases for the people who are still locked up
some of them will definitely push that angle

Hmmm... so in January SCOTUS delivered an opinion on a 6th Amendment case .... 8-1 decision .... try to guess who the one dissenter was?

[Guest]

Hmmm... so in January SCOTUS delivered an opinion on a 6th Amendment case .... 8-1 decision .... try to guess who the one dissenter was?

There was another regarding thr PA GOP trying to get a recount and he also dissented

Regardless of cases, Their marriage calls into question his impartiality on an already divided court. Americans already think less and less of SCOTUS but having an unhinged spouse who tried to overturn a free and fair election knocks it does several more notches.

[Guest]

There was another regarding thr PA GOP trying to get a recount and he also dissented

Regardless of cases, Their marriage calls into question his impartiality on an already divided court. Americans already think less and less of SCOTUS but having an unhinged spouse who tried to overturn a free and fair election knocks it does several more notches.

so exactly how did she (not a member of congress, nor an elected official of the Govt) try to overturn a free and fair election
do you even have a clue of what Congress was meeting for on Jan 6th? and the process by which they certify the electors?
before you answer, go back and look at a little research on this matter in the not so distant past- it may surprise you
just giving you a chance to not embarrass yourself

[Guest]

i have not discussed my sons business dealings with him ever- is that true?
i have not met with any of my sons business partners - is that true ?
there is not one scintilla of evidence in the laptop, is that true?

i wonder if Joe is still getting his payments ?

Brandon just told you that you did not hear what he said, that he didnt say what you heard him say
that he is not backtracking on anything he said, but that he didnt say what you heard him say

thats what 50 years of being a politician gets you-total and complete BS

[Guest]

so exactly how did she (not a member of congress, nor an elected official of the Govt) try to overturn a free and fair election
do you even have a clue of what Congress was meeting for on Jan 6th? and the process by which they certify the electors?
before you answer, go back and look at a little research on this matter in the not so distant past- it may surprise you
just giving you a chance to not embarrass yourself

The Thomas' are an embarrassment to the nation.

[Guest]

it takes a lot for a case to go to the Supreme court never mind one that gets accepted
so far there are no cases- but one I can definitely see getting there is the 6th amendment cases for the people who are still locked up
some of them will definitely push that angle

Now show us you under the “shadow docket” by explaining it. Then tell us again “it takes a lot” while also acknowledging that they don’t even sign their names to those cases.

lack of transparency and lack of accountability rolled into one.

I would also opine that despite the appropriateness of impeaching Thomas, it’s not the best approach. We can avoid an ugly impeachment battle by expanding the court and Thomas’s antics give Biden an angle to do so.

Biden should then name Anita Hill as a nominee. I would PAY to watch those hearings.

but maybe Joe should nominate the black woman from SC. After all, lindesey PROMISED to vote for her and her get additional votes from the GQP.

he should take him up on it :)

[Guest]

the Penn case was not about Jan 6th but about the Gov of Penn changing election laws against the constitution of the state that only allows election laws to be changed by the legislature
this was all done BEFORE the election even took place in OCT 2020
texts after the election had no bearing

You couldn’t be more wrong.

wasn’t the gov, it was the GOP majority legislature that passed ACT 77, the governor then signed it.

so very wrong in the facts. Look up Act 77 and tell us what I get wrong (we won’t be hearing anything on that indont think :) )

Then a LOWER PA court balked but it seems the higher courts in PA disagreed. And of course we all know the SC didn’t want that stinker.

the brouhaha on this started In earnest AFTER the Jan 6 coup attempt and as part of election theft efforts by the GQP.

sorry but just the facts -

Pennsylvania expanded mail voting with a 2019 law that was heralded as a bipartisan compromise since it was passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature and signed by Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf. It later became a target for Republican criticism when then-President Donald Trump falsely criticized mail voting as a source of widespread fraud.

its Tuesday and TC was wrong on the facts again ….so nothing new under the sun today !