Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

[Unregistered]

Come on Snowflake. Does the treasurer of Keg City Club really hurt your feelings so badly you cant see such a vile man on the Supreme Court? Are Kavanagh's high school year book words are so outrageous to you? Do they hurt your virgin ears?

Snowjob,

looking forward to O'Kav's public admission on Thursday about underage drinking, puking in cars etc...but will he be honest (ps that is an important criteria for a SCOTUS judge). I know that the GOP has been having a hard time recently with honesty and likes to lionize liars. Thank God we have a Democratic party to hold them to account :)

[Unregistered]

Good morning Snowflakes. What new accusation will the left cook up today? That's see, we went from unclothing, to penis touches the head, to the Avenatti specialty, gang rape. All with zero corroborating witnesses. This is all sounding pretty ridiculous even for liberals, after 6 FBI background checks.

Martha MacCallum did an excellent job last night with Mr. and Mrs. Kavanaugh. The Thursday hearing will be bad news for democrats. If it even happens. As predicted, it's all backfiring that's why you see a pull back from MSM this morning especially after the Martha interview. The optics are looking real bad for the left.

Yes she did and I’m more convinced he’s a liar and a very bad one at that.
Kavanaugh career is on the line he took this interview to convince people like me , polls from Fox says 56% Republicans don’t believe this privileged little nerd, it’s not a good sign when Fox shows this numbers. After he gets the thumbs down on the Senate he’ll probably retire from the bench instead of being thrown off.


Tom...! You should read “ Everything Trump touch’s it dies” by Republican strategist Rick Wilson.

And yes I am a Republican , watch Fox failthfully and did vote for the Trump but definitely won’t do it again.

Have a nice day.

[Unregistered]

Inherent? That qualifies as a disability
So dems are now against people with disabilities?wheres your empathy?

What a pathetic response...

In legal terms 'inherent' means .... vested in (someone) as a right or privilege...

I can understand why you might want to consider the GOP as being mentally disabled... clearly shows empathy on your part .... :)

[Unregistered]

There is nothing to investigate. All witnesses have giving written testimony that they have no idea what Ford is talking about. What is the FBI going to do, try to find someone that may have saw Ford walking home that day 36 years ago to see if they remember her emotions. Be real.


Besides this shouldn't be allowed to happen on principle. You should not be allowed to lop an 11th hour uncorroborated accusation, without evidence, and alter a nomination process. The republicans are only doing this to be sensitive on the optics.

Sounds like you are calling for the matter to be investigated by the FBI... congrats on your progress :)

[Unregistered]

Ahh the admission that this is simply payback. At least you admit it.

Merrick Garland
Robert Bork
Clarence Thomas

All subjected to the games that the Senate plays.

Unfortunately this will be the new normal. Each side destroying any potential appointee or simply gumming up the works. That will only thin the candidate pool.

Not quite.
Dems hammered Bork and Thomas. Especially the killer Ted , who shows how he felt about women's rights by running away.
Repubs just did not " advise and consent" for Garland, which is Constitutionally proper.
Dems now using mob tactics, suspension of due process and denying presumption of innocence. Clowns like Blumenthal now in the MSNBC center ring. Do our tax dollars ever get anything out of him besides coddling illegals and supporting Lefty twists on Justice ?

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2347105]Yes she did and I’m more convinced he’s a liar and a very bad one at that.
Kavanaugh career is on the line he took this interview to convince people like me , polls from Fox says 56% Republicans don’t believe this privileged little nerd, it’s not a good sign when Fox shows this numbers. After he gets the thumbs down on the Senate he’ll probably retire from the bench instead of being thrown off.


Tom...! You should read “ Everything Trump touch’s it dies” by Republican strategist Rick Wilson.

And yes I am a Republican , watch Fox failthfully and did vote for the Trump but definitely won’t do it again.

Have a nice day.[/QUOTE

Led by Blumenthal, liberals commandeer the mob against due process of law

By Chris Powell
Sep 24, 2018 Updated Sep 24, 2018


Judges, elected officials, and even the most angry political controversies come and go but our liberties and procedural safeguards of justice, fitfully established and nurtured over the centuries, remain more important. The controversy over the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court suggests that those liberties and safeguards are seriously threatened.

The resentful chant against Kavanaugh is that women's accusations of sexual misconduct by men are not believed. This is nonsense, as the Kavanaugh case and a dozen other recent cases have shown that such accusations now are instantly believed by most people prior to any hearing or rebuttal, without any need for evidence. Connecticut's own senior U.S. senator, Richard Blumenthal, has been a leader in demonstrating this, adapting for use against Kavanaugh the maxim from the Queen in "Alice in Wonderland": "Sentence first, verdict afterwards."

No more presumption of innocence.






The accusation against Kavanaugh involves a purported incident so old that it cannot be specified in time or place. Ordinarily a statute of limitations would dismiss it. Statutes of limitations are of long standing and recognize that time erodes evidence and witnesses and makes a defense impossible.

But statutes of limitations for accusations of sexual assault are already being lengthened or repealed throughout the country on the premise that facilitating convictions for underreported crimes is more important than getting convictions right.

Negotiating conditions for her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Kavanaugh's accuser wanted him excluded from the hearing room while she spoke.

So much for the constitutional right to confront one's accusers.

Many people lately have been advocating judicial favoritism for accusers in sexual misconduct cases, allowing accusers to testify anonymously so their testimony cannot be fully evaluated by the public. This is already happening in Connecticut, whose courts allow accusers to testify under pseudonyms even as defendants are identified.

So much for the constitutional right to public trials.

Indeed, the woman who falsely accused James Tillman of East Hartford of raping her in Hartford in 1988, resulting in his conviction and imprisonment for 18 years before DNA evidence exonerated him and caused state government to award him $5 million in damages, has never been identified publicly.



Kavanaugh's accuser also wanted the Judiciary Committee to require him to testify in his defense first, even before she made her accusation formally. Thus he would be less able to rebut it. Even totalitarian countries never went that far with their show trials.

Senator Blumenthal's colleague in the liberal campaign against Kavanaugh, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, may have summarized it best last week. Hirono declared: "I want to say to the men in this country: Just shut up and step up. Do the right thing for a change."

That is, men are always wrong and should not object when constitutional rights are denied. Instead bullying and intimidating them serves them right, for they are all guilty as a group -- just as blacks, Jews, Muslims, aboriginal people, and people of Japanese descent like Hirono herself have been held guilty as groups.

In America's last century, the age of *****ing and red baiting, the mob against due process of law was led by people who considered themselves conservatives. Today that mob is led by people who consider themselves liberals. It was fascism then and it's fascism now.

-----

[Unregistered]

Not quite.
Dems hammered Bork and Thomas. Especially the killer Ted , who shows how he felt about women's rights by running away.
Repubs just did not " advise and consent" for Garland, which is Constitutionally proper.
Dems now using mob tactics, suspension of due process and denying presumption of innocence. Clowns like Blumenthal now in the MSNBC center ring. Do our tax dollars ever get anything out of him besides coddling illegals and supporting Lefty twists on Justice ?

Well well well... blame the Dems cos the GOP have nominated a dud... who is now getting caught with his trousers down... :)

You need to explain and analyze what you mean by ...

<<Repubs just did not " advise and consent" for Garland, which is Constitutionally proper.>>

Seems like you are suggesting that Kav get dumped and Garland is put forward in his stead...

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2347111]

Yes she did and I’m more convinced he’s a liar and a very bad one at that.
Kavanaugh career is on the line he took this interview to convince people like me , polls from Fox says 56% Republicans don’t believe this privileged little nerd, it’s not a good sign when Fox shows this numbers. After he gets the thumbs down on the Senate he’ll probably retire from the bench instead of being thrown off.


Tom...! You should read “ Everything Trump touch’s it dies” by Republican strategist Rick Wilson.

And yes I am a Republican , watch Fox failthfully and did vote for the Trump but definitely won’t do it again.

Have a nice day.[/QUOTE

Led by Blumenthal, liberals commandeer the mob against due process of law

By Chris Powell
Sep 24, 2018 Updated Sep 24, 2018


Judges, elected officials, and even the most angry political controversies come and go but our liberties and procedural safeguards of justice, fitfully established and nurtured over the centuries, remain more important. The controversy over the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court suggests that those liberties and safeguards are seriously threatened.

The resentful chant against Kavanaugh is that women's accusations of sexual misconduct by men are not believed. This is nonsense, as the Kavanaugh case and a dozen other recent cases have shown that such accusations now are instantly believed by most people prior to any hearing or rebuttal, without any need for evidence. Connecticut's own senior U.S. senator, Richard Blumenthal, has been a leader in demonstrating this, adapting for use against Kavanaugh the maxim from the Queen in "Alice in Wonderland": "Sentence first, verdict afterwards."

No more presumption of innocence.






The accusation against Kavanaugh involves a purported incident so old that it cannot be specified in time or place. Ordinarily a statute of limitations would dismiss it. Statutes of limitations are of long standing and recognize that time erodes evidence and witnesses and makes a defense impossible.

But statutes of limitations for accusations of sexual assault are already being lengthened or repealed throughout the country on the premise that facilitating convictions for underreported crimes is more important than getting convictions right.

Negotiating conditions for her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Kavanaugh's accuser wanted him excluded from the hearing room while she spoke.

So much for the constitutional right to confront one's accusers.

Many people lately have been advocating judicial favoritism for accusers in sexual misconduct cases, allowing accusers to testify anonymously so their testimony cannot be fully evaluated by the public. This is already happening in Connecticut, whose courts allow accusers to testify under pseudonyms even as defendants are identified.

So much for the constitutional right to public trials.

Indeed, the woman who falsely accused James Tillman of East Hartford of raping her in Hartford in 1988, resulting in his conviction and imprisonment for 18 years before DNA evidence exonerated him and caused state government to award him $5 million in damages, has never been identified publicly.



Kavanaugh's accuser also wanted the Judiciary Committee to require him to testify in his defense first, even before she made her accusation formally. Thus he would be less able to rebut it. Even totalitarian countries never went that far with their show trials.

Senator Blumenthal's colleague in the liberal campaign against Kavanaugh, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, may have summarized it best last week. Hirono declared: "I want to say to the men in this country: Just shut up and step up. Do the right thing for a change."

That is, men are always wrong and should not object when constitutional rights are denied. Instead bullying and intimidating them serves them right, for they are all guilty as a group -- just as blacks, Jews, Muslims, aboriginal people, and people of Japanese descent like Hirono herself have been held guilty as groups.

In America's last century, the age of *****ing and red baiting, the mob against due process of law was led by people who considered themselves conservatives. Today that mob is led by people who consider themselves liberals. It was fascism then and it's fascism now.

-----

and the judiciary committee did not want the FBI to investigate the claim, nor put a witness to the alleged event on the stand... what a Kangaroo Court ...

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2347120]

and the judiciary committee did not want the FBI to investigate the claim, nor put a witness to the alleged event on the stand... what a Kangaroo Court ...

That's why it should be heard within the US Justice System , NOT in the Senate.
But it is the Dems that pushed as they fear due process, presumption of innocence, facing your accuser etc. All Constitutional Rights.
By bypassing the Judicial System, they are trying to turn Justice around and claiming all sorts of nonsense.
Dumb Yale Law students protesting , and riding the train of the destruction of Constitutional Rights. MSM has everyone whipped to a frenzy, based on nothing but allegations. No evidence. No witnesses, no Police Reports, nothing that usually would occur in a Civil or Criminal action.

It is a disgrace to the country.

[Unregistered]

Trump Killing um at the UN


Made it clear we ain't helping all those Shtye hole countries that dont give Shtye back...African nation - Arab Nations are you listening!!

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2347120]

and the judiciary committee did not want the FBI to investigate the claim, nor put a witness to the alleged event on the stand... what a Kangaroo Court ...

Well, that's the point. Its not a court. Ford relinquished her legal rights by not going to court. So now she will be judged by the republican controlled Senate.

[Unregistered]

Trump Killing um at the UN


Made it clear we ain't helping all those Shtye hole countries that dont give Shtye back...African nation - Arab Nations are you listening!!

Go Trump!!

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2347130]

That's why it should be heard within the US Justice System , NOT in the Senate.
But it is the Dems that pushed as they fear due process, presumption of innocence, facing your accuser etc. All Constitutional Rights.
By bypassing the Judicial System, they are trying to turn Justice around and claiming all sorts of nonsense.
Dumb Yale Law students protesting , and riding the train of the destruction of Constitutional Rights. MSM has everyone whipped to a frenzy, based on nothing but allegations. No evidence. No witnesses, no Police Reports, nothing that usually would occur in a Civil or Criminal action.

It is a disgrace to the country.

MSM has everyone whipped to a frenzy, based on nothing but allegations. No evidence. No witnesses, no Police Reports, nothing that usually would occur in a Civil or Criminal action...….. kind of like Russian Collusion, that's the only thing the Dems know how to do these days.

[Unregistered]

Snowjob,

looking forward to O'Kav's public admission on Thursday about underage drinking, puking in cars etc...but will he be honest (ps that is an important criteria for a SCOTUS judge). I know that the GOP has been having a hard time recently with honesty and likes to lionize liars. Thank God we have a Democratic party to hold them to account :)

Ha, I knew you were a true Snowflake, underage drinking, puking, is that the holier than thou standard we want to hold liberals to? That's an easy game to play.

[Unregistered]

Laughing stock

Laughter in UN General Assembly as President Trump touts his administration's progress in past 2 years: "Didn't expect that reaction, but that's OK."