Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

[Guest]

... and the danger comes from the right... did you see what Uncle ClarenceTom's wife was texting to Mark Meadows? There should be another vacancy coming up on the SCOTUS soon....

"Uncle Tom"??? how kkk of you. not surprising given your party history.

[Guest]

<< hell, i'm not the smartest person in the world>> Good, we agree on that.

<<and i'm not a biologist either>> But I am ...

<<its a simple question that would require a simple answer>> no its not and Jackson is correct in referring an answer to biology

<<I'm sure others are more qualified and deserve the job more for their intellect and character and not strictly for the color of their skin.>> Hmm... Jackson is more qualified than anybody presently serving on the SCOTUS....the only thing you seem to have against her is the color of her skin and the fact that she has been nominated by Biden.

really? typical of a liberal to bring race into this. noone said anything about color untill you. always playing the race card to divide americans while your liberal slave masters keep control and run off with all the money....occasionally they like to give back some scraps to let you know how nice they are.

[Guest]

<<who isnt qualified to be on the SCOTUS?>> the original post did not say that ... it said they were "less qualified" and the answer would be all of them... So spare us all your b-ll**** by reading and internalizing the text before you respond.

<<nobody asked Bart to define "man">> that is because it is not relevant .... just as asking Jackson to define "woman" is not relevant to a SCOTUS hearing . Now asking Bart to define a "sexual offender" where would you stand on that ?

how could one be less qualified?- the qualifications for the job are written in the Constitution-you either meet them or you dont- i get that you would rather I NOT read your BS, that way i couldnt call out all of your BS
asking KBJ was relevant based on her writtings and her opinions, but alas she couldnt answerbut
they certainly asked Brett K about sexual offense throughout his nomination- was it relevant? NO because his accuser was FOS and the accusations were baseless, but he answered the question

[Guest]

<< hell, i'm not the smartest person in the world>> Good, we agree on that.

<<and i'm not a biologist either>> But I am ...

<<its a simple question that would require a simple answer>> no its not and Jackson is correct in referring an answer to biology

<<I'm sure others are more qualified and deserve the job more for their intellect and character and not strictly for the color of their skin.>> Hmm... Jackson is more qualified than anybody presently serving on the SCOTUS....the only thing you seem to have against her is the color of her skin and the fact that she has been nominated by Biden.

Biologically it is a very easy question to answer- the science has been consistent for a very long time
chromosomes
reproductive organs, structural changes for reproduction
menstruation and the ****** that goes with it

not really that hard

[Guest]

... and the danger comes from the right... did you see what Uncle ClarenceTom's wife was texting to Mark Meadows? There should be another vacancy coming up on the SCOTUS soon....

Ginny Thomas is not on the SCOTUS

[Guest]

<< hell, i'm not the smartest person in the world>> Good, we agree on that.

<<and i'm not a biologist either>> But I am ...

<<its a simple question that would require a simple answer>> no its not and Jackson is correct in referring an answer to biology

<<I'm sure others are more qualified and deserve the job more for their intellect and character and not strictly for the color of their skin.>> Hmm... Jackson is more qualified than anybody presently serving on the SCOTUS....the only thing you seem to have against her is the color of her skin and the fact that she has been nominated by Biden.

please tell us how she is MORE qualified than anyone presently serving on the SCOTUS ?
please be specific

[Guest]

"Uncle Tom"??? how kkk of you. not surprising given your party history.

Thought I would sprinkle a few crumbs for the chickens ...

Note the dictionary definition of Uncle Tom = a black man considered to be excessively obedient or servile to white people.
In an 8-to-1 ruling the Supreme Court said Trump can’t claim executive privilege over documents sought by those investigating the insurrection of Jan 6th. The dissent was from Clarence Thomas, who gave no legal analysis, just that he was supporting the granting of Trump's request.
Let's have your interpretation of that .... especially in light of his wife's texts to Mark Meadow re overturning the election.

[Guest]

Thought I would sprinkle a few crumbs for the chickens ...

Note the dictionary definition of Uncle Tom = a black man considered to be excessively obedient or servile to white people.
In an 8-to-1 ruling the Supreme Court said Trump can’t claim executive privilege over documents sought by those investigating the insurrection of Jan 6th. The dissent was from Clarence Thomas, who gave no legal analysis, just that he was supporting the granting of Trump's request.
Let's have your interpretation of that .... especially in light of his wife's texts to Mark Meadow re overturning the election.

he obviously believes executive privilege applies in this case- very simple
his wifes text are from his wife not him- she is a big girl and involved in many things political on the conservative side and has been for years- guess you just found out who she was

[Guest]

Ginny Thomas is not on the SCOTUS

No, but her husband is ... and Clarence voted without explanation in favor of tee-RUMP's request to be allowed to claim executive privilege.... clearly he should have recused himself given the target of GTs texts was Mark Meadows who is a major part of the request. i.e. its a conflict of interest. The fact that all other Repug appointees to SCOTUS opposed it is a good indicator...

[Guest]

Biologically it is a very easy question to answer- the science has been consistent for a very long time
chromosomes
reproductive organs, structural changes for reproduction
menstruation and the ****** that goes with it

not really that hard

im not a biologist either...but when i see a shark...i know its a shark...just saying.
for libbys, 1+1 does not equal 2 anymore.

[Guest]

he obviously believes executive privilege applies in this case- very simple
his wifes text are from his wife not him- she is a big girl and involved in many things political on the conservative side and has been for years- guess you just found out who she was

No ... we knew who she was ... we just heard about the texts (apparently with more to come). Clearly a problem for CT -- if your wife is texting somebody in the case that you are adjudicating, you should recuse yourself. Note Jackson's stance on recusing herself.

[Guest]

im not a biologist either...but when i see a shark...i know its a shark...just saying.
for libbys, 1+1 does not equal 2 anymore.

Your argument seems to be "I am not knowledgable, so here is the opinion that I have arrived at... "

Note sharks are from a different species from humans and are thus easy to distinguish. Men and women are from the same species and they are not all equal in their manliness or womanliness. Take what you call a man for example and give him lots of estrogen ... and lo and behold he grows breasts... is he a man still? Or take what you call a woman and give her lots of testosterone .... deep voice, hairy chin etc. Is she still a woman?

So, if it is so obvious, let us know how you define "a woman"

[Guest]

Thought I would sprinkle a few crumbs for the chickens ...

Note the dictionary definition of Uncle Tom = a black man considered to be excessively obedient or servile to white people.
In an 8-to-1 ruling the Supreme Court said Trump can’t claim executive privilege over documents sought by those investigating the insurrection of Jan 6th. The dissent was from Clarence Thomas, who gave no legal analysis, just that he was supporting the granting of Trump's request.
Let's have your interpretation of that .... especially in light of his wife's texts to Mark Meadow re overturning the election.

if he was casting the deciding vote then it would be news...it was just a poor decision not to recuse himself IF he knew about the texts beforehand...ask your wife about poor decisions and she can explain it to you...just be prepared because it may sting when your name is brought up in the conversation...

[Guest]

Your argument seems to be "I am not knowledgable, so here is the opinion that I have arrived at... "

Note sharks are from a different species from humans and are thus easy to distinguish. Men and women are from the same species and they are not all equal in their manliness or womanliness. Take what you call a man for example and give him lots of estrogen ... and lo and behold he grows breasts... is he a man still? Or take what you call a woman and give her lots of testosterone .... deep voice, hairy chin etc. Is she still a woman?

So, if it is so obvious, let us know how you define "a woman"

no problem....and for the record, lia thomas is NOT a woman, "its a man baby yeah"

she can't get pregnant and she can't give birth,...unless of perhaps she is born on the island of dr moreau.

[Guest]

Play back the rePIGS choices for SCOTUS.... far less qualified ...

Did anyone ask Bret O'Kavanaugh to define Man?... he obviously would not know... other than as attempted rapist... more homo than sapiens...

They did, he said anyone who didnt look at his junk when he was in the school locker room. It is more relevant today since the rise of the libtards and the destroying of girls sports