Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

[Unregistered]

No obsession, just the facts.

And what relevance do these facts have to anything going on in this country right now? What's your point?

[Unregistered]

The Washington Examiner got its hands on emails showing that the Clinton Foundation sought ties with Russian billionaire Viktor Vekselberg at a time when he was in charge of an important element of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's "Russian reset."

Hillary helped create "a major technology transfer initiative" that "may have substantially undermined U.S. national security," according to Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute and the author of " Clinton Cash."

Part of the "reset" was the creation of "Skolkovo," an industrial enclave near Moscow that was to become a kind of Russian Silicon Valley. The idea was to encourage U.S. firms to help out with both technology and investment, in exchange for market access.

Despite warnings from both the FBI and her own State Department about the possibility of Russia getting access to militarily sensitive technologies, Hillary went ahead with the program. Why?

At the time, Vekselberg -- head of the Skolkovo Foundation and a pal of Vladimir Putin -- was also a contributor to the Clinton Foundation. These ties later proved quite lucrative, with 17 of the 28 American companies that participated in the Skolkovo project also being donors to the Clinton Foundation.

All the way back in 2010, as Skolkovo was getting underway, former President Bill Clinton traveled to Russia to deliver a speech for which he was paid $500,000 by a mysterious Russian investment bank named "Renaissance Capital." While there he met with a variety of movers and shakers, including Vekselberg.

With the Clintons, one hand always washes the other.

Now that it has been revealed that thousands of emails on Hillary's unsecured home-brew server have been intentionally destroyed, it is certainly fitting to wonder whether damning or incriminating evidence about the Clinton Foundation and its ties to Hillary's office at the State Department was destroyed.

The U.S. State Department used to be known for its high-toned and principled stands in defense of U.S. foreign-policy goals and interests. But today, after two Democratic leaders, it appears to be more of a revolving door for crony capitalists.

We would hope Congress would continue to investigate the email scandal and what appears to be rampant abuse of office that has taken place at the State Department over the past eight years. Such clear conflicts of interest used to raise political hackles.

Congress should, at minimum, make sure that future secretaries of state no longer abuse their office to personally enrich their families and friends. Anything less is to condone criminality.

The Washington Examiner is to conservatives, what MSNBC is to progressives.

There's no objectivity in either camp.

[Unregistered]

14th Amendment.

Anyone have an opinion on Trumps idea of turning this Amendment around? Truly it’s an antiquated Amendment and was geared to slave children.

China , South American and the African Nation countries have used this loophole for decades. Personally I feel it’s the best way to slow or stop the landscape change of the country.

Just my thoughts. Don’t hate.

[Unregistered]

Actually getting rid of the birthright citizenship system is probably the only thing I've ever agreed with Trump on. It totally gets abused and we're one of the few countries in the world that still has it. Almost anywhere else you need a parent or grandparent citizen connection.

That said, his comments that he can just executive order it away shows how either 1) utterly clueless he is since he cannot do it, only Congress can 2) he knows his base is utterly clueless and doesn't understand he can't eliminate it. I'm not sure which it is but both are pathetic.

[Unregistered]

Actually getting rid of the birthright citizenship system is probably the only thing I've ever agreed with Trump on. It totally gets abused and we're one of the few countries in the world that still has it. Almost anywhere else you need a parent or grandparent citizen connection.

That said, his comments that he can just executive order it away shows how either 1) utterly clueless he is since he cannot do it, only Congress can 2) he knows his base is utterly clueless and doesn't understand he can't eliminate it. I'm not sure which it is but both are pathetic.

Actually, the exact wording of the Constitution has never been clarified in an exact case of an illegal and their child. SCOTUS will most likely end up deciding that.

[Unregistered]

14th Amendment

Anyone have an opinion on Trumps idea of turning this Amendment around? Truly it’s an antiquated Amendment and was geared to slave children.

China , South American and the African Nation countries have used this loophole for decades. Personally I feel it’s the best way to slow or stop the landscape change of the country.

Just my thoughts. Don’t hate.

Illegally entering the country in order to give birth is a No No, no illegals period! You don’t have to be a Fuktard to agree with that.

Carry on.

[Unregistered]

Anyone have an opinion on Trumps idea of turning this Amendment around? Truly it’s an antiquated Amendment and was geared to slave children.

China , South American and the African Nation countries have used this loophole for decades. Personally I feel it’s the best way to slow or stop the landscape change of the country.

Just my thoughts. Don’t hate.

Agreed. Lets also revisit the 2nd amendment. Im tired of the "originalist" arguments.

[Unregistered]

Trump agrees with Obama 100% ... here’s proof.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-illeg/



False Narrative by Republicans—truth is, all Americans that means Democrats too don’t want illegals entering the country. They want the process to be done correctly.

[Unregistered]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-illeg/



False Narrative by Republicans—truth is, all Americans that means Democrats too don’t want illegals entering the country. They want the process to be done correctly.

Most of the GOP and Trump platform is a false narrative.

[Unregistered]

Most of the GOP and Trump platform is a false narrative.

False narrative ? Does the Leftist Democrat's love for Iran , with the pallet of cash Obama sent to support terrorism against Jews , supporting a deal for them to have nuclear weapons stack up against their instant outrage regarding the murders at the Temple in Pittsburgh ?

[Unregistered]

False narrative ? Does the Leftist Democrat's love for Iran , with the pallet of cash Obama sent to support terrorism against Jews , supporting a deal for them to have nuclear weapons stack up against their instant outrage regarding the murders at the Temple in Pittsburgh ?

Irrelevant comparisons as always. Find some new material.

[Unregistered]

Foolish Post....please stop. Lets have a sensible argument here.

False narrative ? Does the Leftist Democrat's love for Iran , with the pallet of cash Obama sent to support terrorism against Jews , supporting a deal for them to have nuclear weapons stack up against their instant outrage regarding the murders at the Temple in Pittsburgh ?

OMG why are you so stupid.
What piles of cash , even your King had to change that line once he was corrected that it was Iran's money being held since 1978, candidate Trump was suckered into the fake/false video of a plane in the cover of night transporting what Fox convinced fools like you as cash to Iran.

Cmon Degenerate Fuktard , i know you're a male poster but now your making me have to call you a Fuktart too.

[Unregistered]

Pinball Wizard

False narrative ? Does the Leftist Democrat's love for Iran , with the pallet of cash Obama sent to support terrorism against Jews , supporting a deal for them to have nuclear weapons stack up against their instant outrage regarding the murders at the Temple in Pittsburgh ?

... wow... ignorance personified....

Deaf, Dumb and Blind is no way to go through life

[Unregistered]

False narrative ? Does the Leftist Democrat's love for Iran , with the pallet of cash Obama sent to support terrorism against Jews , supporting a deal for them to have nuclear weapons stack up against their instant outrage regarding the murders at the Temple in Pittsburgh ?

How many times does it have to be said that the money returned to Iran was their money, taken when we imposed sanctions years before? Once those sanctions were released, we were obligated to the agreement we signed and return their cash to them.

Maybe you would prefer we would be some scumbag country and sign an agreement and then not uphold the terms? Isn't that was the whole issue with Iran is once again? Them not holding up their end of the agreement and causing Trump to back out of it?

[Unregistered]

... wow... ignorance personified....

Deaf, Dumb and Blind is no way to go through life

It worked for Tommy, well, until he opened up his holiday camp.