Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wilton STRONG

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Man, when we were in HS if our coach stepped quickly toward you on the field during a game, you were far more scared of him and the consequences than anything. My parents would have supported him and piled on until I were dead. Thankfully, lesson learned after the first, mild incident .... never needed to push it again after that in any subsequent year. As soon as we heard coach YELL our name, we knew to back down if our replacement wasn't already standing at mid field. It sucked being in his dog house and it was hard to get out .... I think it was even worse for the top players as his expectations were so high for them. They learned too who the boss was and talent only seemed to make the penalties more severe and the leash shorter.
    thats some serious old school right there- good stuff

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Where does it state , in regards to High School Soccer Coaches , that they should physically intervene if they witness two players fighting ?

      They are not obligated to do so, so therefore, should not.
      I am not obligated by law to help a little old lady that got the crap kicked out of her during a mugging, but i still should. Laywer POS.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        thats some serious old school right there- good stuff
        That was the 80's not that old .... our coach at the time was probably in his mid- to late- 40's, so he wasn't that old either. There was no doubt by any parent, player, assistant coach, or admin who ran the team .... and it was a very good team and the issues with the team were handled internally (and well I might add).

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Stay on topic. This is not what happened in this case.

          Just show me where in a Coach's written responsibilities , that they agree to when taking the position, that they have permission to physically intervene when two players are involved in a physical confrontation.
          they agree to represent the school in a positive light and to adhere to a scool rules and policies
          and to the best of their abilities provide a safe environment for the kids in their charge

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Stay on topic. This is not what happened in this case.

            Just show me where in a Coach's written responsibilities , that they agree to when taking the position, that they have permission to physically intervene when two players are involved in a physical confrontation.
            That is just common sense. You would expect any rational person to intervene in the altercation. However, Wilton's first response was for the third girl to get involved and elevate the situation to the next level. Wilton's second response was for a dad to go after a coach in the parking lot.

            We all know that there is no common sense in Wilton especially when it comes to girls soccer. If Wilton had their way the girl and the coach would be in the hospital.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Where does it state , in regards to High School Soccer Coaches , that they should physically intervene if they witness two players fighting ?

              They are not obligated to do so, so therefore, should not.
              did you really mean to say this? What if it happened in practice? call the police and wait for them to show up?

              Just because there is not a rule saying you are obligated to do it does not mean you should not do it.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                did you really mean to say this? What if it happened in practice? call the police and wait for them to show up?

                Just because there is not a rule saying you are obligated to do it does not mean you should not do it.
                I don't care. I'm suing EVERYONE for actions and inactions, both.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  That was the 80's not that old .... our coach at the time was probably in his mid- to late- 40's, so he wasn't that old either. There was no doubt by any parent, player, assistant coach, or admin who ran the team .... and it was a very good team and the issues with the team were handled internally (and well I might add).
                  that means he was groomed in the late 60s 70s-thats the old school part
                  it still works-kids crave structure and discipline,
                  be fair, consistent and dont ever lie to them and they will thrive in that environment

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    I don't care. I'm suing EVERYONE for actions and inactions, both.
                    thats because you are a piece of s**t, you cant help yourself you dont know any better

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      thats because you are a piece of s**t, you cant help yourself you dont know any better
                      Because I'll make bank.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        thats because you are a piece of s**t, you cant help yourself you dont know any better
                        Does all of CT not get sarcasm, or just selected individuals?

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          did you really mean to say this? What if it happened in practice? call the police and wait for them to show up?

                          Just because there is not a rule saying you are obligated to do it does not mean you should not do it.
                          If there isn't a pre existing acceptance of obligation, it may be best to avoid participation to ensure that one will not be held liable in any way.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Does all of CT not get sarcasm, or just selected individuals?
                            sarcasm is supposed to have an element of humor- yours did not and is actually pretty Standard Op for the civil judicial side of this

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Does all of CT not get sarcasm, or just selected individuals?
                              I appreciated it! That "take no action of any kind if not an explicit obligation" guy needed a bit of sarcastic humor. What a world that would be.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                If there isn't a pre existing acceptance of obligation, it may be best to avoid participation to ensure that one will not be held liable in any way.
                                it is implied that you will act like the adult

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X