Originally posted by Guest
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rutgers Women's Soccer
Collapse
X
-
Guest
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
What are you talking about it is all very competitive.
ACC has 5; Pac12 has 4 (Az has no conf wins so they will drop out of top 25 likely...so down to 3) ; Big 10 has 3; Pac 13 has 3; SEC has 3.
No conference has the lock for all.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
The entire debate was RU - we are elite. Others- no you are not....yet. Subsequently people like you have tried to twist the argument. RU fans, be happy. Those that dont like RU, have at it. There is no obligation to be proud of RU simply because they are the state school. What makes the Big 10 a top conference for Women's Soccer?
Historically big 10 has at least 5 in the top rpi (based on strength of schedule; ooc play; away games won etc). It is a top conference.
RU is doing great but has really only played a few big programs. They have a pretty light in conf schedule. They are not playing wis; ind; purdue.
They barely beat psu (pk gift) and OhioS (most quality gk's are stopping that FT dribbler...not trying to take away from FT..but that was a weak goal given up). But RU gave tough MI a beating. Zero ACC; no WCC; No pac 12; no Hofstra; lost to princeton and GT.
great to see them have success.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
How many Big10 have rpi's in top 40? 6 big 10; 3 pac 12; 5 sec; 3 ivy; 8 acc; 3 big east: 2 wcc; 3 big 12; 3 aac... These are your top programs.
Historically big 10 has at least 5 in the top rpi (based on strength of schedule; ooc play; away games won etc). It is a top conference.
RU is doing great but has really only played a few big programs. They have a pretty light in conf schedule. They are not playing wis; ind; purdue.
They barely beat psu (pk gift) and OhioS (most quality gk's are stopping that FT dribbler...not trying to take away from FT..but that was a weak goal given up). But RU gave tough MI a beating. Zero ACC; no WCC; No pac 12; no Hofstra; lost to princeton and GT.
great to see them have success.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Probably not based on the level of competition in the Big Ten conference
Many teams last season played only their regional conf teams instead of a full conference schedule. Hard to pick winners amd losers all over. This is definitely a season of shockers. And it is just getting started.
Popcorn please!
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
You continue to trash Big10. 6 teams have top 40 rpi; maybe more after this weekend. It is second in top 40 rpi only to acc who have 8 (and some may drop after this weekend) even acc teams are struggling against each other. Leftover players in various leagues and teams are throwing off the succession IMHO ; Where coaches have recruited based on known players snd match ups.
Many teams last season played only their regional conf teams instead of a full conference schedule. Hard to pick winners amd losers all over. This is definitely a season of shockers. And it is just getting started.
Popcorn please!
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Do you? It is strength schedule (and who they played and beat as well); wins/draws; at home; away.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
A system where you get more credit for playing West Carolina (8-5-1) than you do the defending National Champion, Santa Clara (6-4-2).More weight goes to that vs your own record. Plain dumb system in Womens soccer.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
75% has nothing to do with your own record. Ie out of your hands. Its a terrible measure of strength of schedule. So basically you are bragging about RPI , ie the wins and losses of your opponents with no adjustment for the quality of said opponents. Pretty stupid really. BTW, it getting to the dance is your issue, then seriously, you are not an Elite program with top tier aspirations.
- Quote
Comment
Comment