Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is CFC is the #1 scumbag club in the USA?
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
YES - CFC are scumbags
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWest went 0-8 in the EDP league, scored 1 goal, conceded 25
So is that your definition of being the best? By getting pounded? World class, fsa, and albertson were the only ecnl clubs in the league.
They will get destroyed at the Pre ecnl level, CFCs should at least split the games between the branches.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhoa. With that kind of record there's hardly a justification to give West anything, let alone the whole shebang. Makes no sense at all. But it's TS so this could all be BS. Agree with poster above that giving both branches tough competition is a good way to build up for CFCU
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt's hard for SD to lobby for his program given that he's preoccupied with another endeavor. West it is.
But there haven't been any Arsenal parents on here bit*Hing yet (and they certainly would if true) so maybe this is just another TS rumor
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
U13 is just a fill gap year. CFC at U14 puts together their proper ECNL and NPL teams so just being in the club is enough if you want to be in the United program.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
CFC usually pays more attention to how the branches fare in the Cup in determining Pre-ECNL assignments.
And once you get the assignment, they won't take it away the next year as the drama it would cause is not worth it - especially for a program (Pre-ECNL) that is meant to be developmental.
So how did Arsenal and West do in the cup at U12?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCFC usually pays more attention to how the branches fare in the Cup in determining Pre-ECNL assignments.
And once you get the assignment, they won't take it away the next year as the drama it would cause is not worth it - especially for a program (Pre-ECNL) that is meant to be developmental.
So how did Arsenal and West do in the cup at U12?
http://www.cjsareg.org/cjsacup/Brack...p/U12Girls.pdf
The rest of argument also doesn't hold because by your reasoning once assigned always assigned. And if Arsenal doesn't have it this year then they are taking it way from them (1/2 anyway). Arsenal parents would be furious.
Shouldn't this be something CFC decides before tryout time so folks know what they're signing up for? If this is all true then yes the Scumbag title definitely holds
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostU13 is just a fill gap year. CFC at U14 puts together their proper ECNL and NPL teams so just being in the club is enough if you want to be in the United program.
Arsenal, are definitely the stronger of the two branches. the designation should have gone to them. Perhaps politics are playing a part in selecting west. Now that their best players (team) has been "united" they need something to carry their flag
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Notice how every CFC discusison eventually devoles to a West versus Arsenal argument? And yet people still seem to be under the illusion that CFC is a single, unified "club." It's only a club in that they wear the same uniforms.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNotice how every CFC discusison eventually devoles to a West versus Arsenal argument? And yet people still seem to be under the illusion that CFC is a single, unified "club." It's only a club in that they wear the same uniforms.
As for this year's U13s there are several strong players at YU and Ginga. If CFC can snag them for CFCU next year then that will help. If they stick with their prior practice of 98% CFC players the CFCU teams won't be very strong as they have been. Yet, if they take too many outsiders they tick off CFC parents and threaten the entire CFC structure. It's a no win situation that they've not faced before.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Why is this thread still alive?
Haven't we already agreed that, indeed, "CFC is the #1 scumbag club in the USA"?
Move on already.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
It's like a convicted criminal who keeps trying to present new evidence to get a re-trial or even better an overturned conviction. TS judges keep turning them down.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI've always said Arsenal and West are the A teams, the branches are all B.
As for this year's U13s there are several strong players at YU and Ginga. If CFC can snag them for CFCU next year then that will help. If they stick with their prior practice of 98% CFC players the CFCU teams won't be very strong as they have been. Yet, if they take too many outsiders they tick off CFC parents and threaten the entire CFC structure. It's a no win situation that they've not faced before.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI've always said Arsenal and West are the A teams, the branches are all B.
As for this year's U13s there are several strong players at YU and Ginga. If CFC can snag them for CFCU next year then that will help. If they stick with their prior practice of 98% CFC players the CFCU teams won't be very strong as they have been. Yet, if they take too many outsiders they tick off CFC parents and threaten the entire CFC structure. It's a no win situation that they've not faced before.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSorry, can't have 40 "A" players one year and then 20 the next. By the TS definition of "A" teams and players, CFC has two teams with a mix of A and B players. But inmplies to the parents and players that they are all A players. And they everyone is "shocked" to find out a year later that was not the case. Again, CFC is not a club, just a loose association of separate soccer teams that compete more fiercely against one another than they do against teams from other clubs.
- Quote
Comment
Comment