Club Size Rank

[Unregistered]

theres no way those numbers are their players. that would make them have about a dozen teams

The #'s are the #'s. Prove them wrong.

[Unregistered]

The #'s are the #'s. Prove them wrong.

Prove these wrong.

1. Stars (307)
2. NEFC (294)
3. Juventus (273)
4. Bolts (259)
5. Surf (251)
6. Seacoast (246)
7. SSS (212)
8. Valeo (199)
9. Liverpool (178)
10. Scorpions (152)

[Unregistered]

Prove these wrong.

1. Stars (307)
2. NEFC (294)
3. Juventus (273)
4. Bolts (259)
5. Surf (251)
6. Seacoast (246)
7. SSS (212)
8. Valeo (199)
9. Liverpool (178)
10. Scorpions (152)

How can you put these numbers out there when the SSS website clearly lists 185 players?

[Unregistered]

How can you put these numbers out there when the SSS website clearly lists 185 players?

Because he is wrong and a NEFC Troll

[Unregistered]

Prove these wrong.

1. Stars (307)
2. NEFC (294)
3. Juventus (273)
4. Bolts (259)
5. Surf (251)
6. Seacoast (246)
7. SSS (212)
8. Valeo (199)
9. Liverpool (178)
10. Scorpions (152)

Just your be doing simple math and logic.
If you say stars only has 307 players
That say 16 kids per team that 19 teams in their the entire club including boys from u9 to u19?
Or even better SSS you say only has 212 players?
Say 16 kids per team that’s 13 teams in their entire club from u9-u18.
All these clubs probably have over 300 kids. I would assume select is closer to the top.

[Unregistered]

Just your be doing simple math and logic.
If you say stars only has 307 players
That say 16 kids per team that 19 teams in their the entire club including boys from u9 to u19?
Or even better SSS you say only has 212 players?
Say 16 kids per team that’s 13 teams in their entire club from u9-u18.
All these clubs probably have over 300 kids. I would assume select is closer to the top.

can you not see you are being trolled?

[Unregistered]

can you not see you are being trolled?

Nope... hilarious. I guarantee one of these posters is examining websites and team rosters to try to prove his point.

Don't forget: in order to have an average IQ of 98 in the US, there need to be quite a few people below that number. TS is loaded with them!

[Unregistered]

Nope... hilarious. I guarantee one of these posters is examining websites and team rosters to try to prove his point.

Don't forget: in order to have an average IQ of 98 in the US, there need to be quite a few people below that number. TS is loaded with them!

Exactly. LOL

[Unregistered]

Prove these wrong.

1. Stars (307)
2. NEFC (294)
3. Juventus (273)
4. Bolts (259)
5. Surf (251)
6. Seacoast (246)
7. SSS (212)
8. Valeo (199)
9. Liverpool (178)
10. Scorpions (152)

I checked all the teams across all the leagues for each club. These numbers are correct. Well done OP.

[Unregistered]

I checked all the teams across all the leagues for each club. These numbers are correct. Well done OP.

No, they are wrong for several teams - off by more than a dozen players in one case. I checked them twice.

[Unregistered]

No, they are wrong for several teams - off by more than a dozen players in one case. I checked them twice.

Since almost all clubs listed are separated by more than a dozen the rankings basically hold true, right? I’m sure the OP appreciates your endorsement. Again, nice job OP. Thanks!

[Unregistered]

This is the dumbest thread I’ve ever seen. A mid size club has more players than what’s being written. Clubs around 30 teams are not the big ones, but they have more than 400 players so this is stupidity

[Unregistered]

This is the dumbest thread I’ve ever seen. A mid size club has more players than what’s being written. Clubs around 30 teams are not the big ones, but they have more than 400 players so this is stupidity

Prove the OP wrong.

[Unregistered]

Prove the OP wrong.

Come on man.

U9 to U17 is 9 levels. x2 for boys and girls. x an average of 16 per team = 288.

That's if they have ONE team of boys and girls (or two teams of boys or girls).

[Unregistered]

Prove the OP wrong.

FC Stars had 12 2007 teams last year (on the girls side only). That’s about 200 players—one age group, one gender only.