Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tryouts

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    [QUOTE=Unregistered;3048284]If you had said surf 10 team lost a lot of players, that would be a fact. However, the ones that left were demoted, or were not part of the core that matters, hence the reason the left. But the 10 team reloaded with stronger players

    In true fashion. Reload with players developed by other teams. Don’t focus on developing what you have. Those at greatest risk of being replaced are those who have been on that team the longest.

    Comment


      #32
      [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050507]
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      If you had said surf 10 team lost a lot of players, that would be a fact. However, the ones that left were demoted, or were not part of the core that matters, hence the reason the left. But the 10 team reloaded with stronger players

      In true fashion. Reload with players developed by other teams. Don’t focus on developing what you have. Those at greatest risk of being replaced are those who have been on that team the longest.

      The new players must not have liked something going on at their previous club to move to surf. That speaks volumes about the "clubs" in RI, none of the new surf players came from Mass or CT, they are from RI. Seems if you are a 2010 girl, your best option in RI is to make the 2010 surf team. There isn't a 2010 team in RI that comes close to challenging that surf team. True or false?

      Comment


        #33
        [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050673]
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post


        The new players must not have liked something going on at their previous club to move to surf. That speaks volumes about the "clubs" in RI, none of the new surf players came from Mass or CT, they are from RI. Seems if you are a 2010 girl, your best option in RI is to make the 2010 surf team. There isn't a 2010 team in RI that comes close to challenging that surf team. True or false?
        Take away the number 1 player and surf 2010 girls are not as dominant as you make them sound. Competitive yes but I would not say that no other club could can come close. True or false?

        Comment


          #34
          [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050675]
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

          Take away the number 1 player and surf 2010 girls are not as dominant as you make them sound. Competitive yes but I would not say that no other club could can come close. True or false?
          Is this u12?

          Comment


            #35
            [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050675]
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

            Take away the number 1 player and surf 2010 girls are not as dominant as you make them sound. Competitive yes but I would not say that no other club could can come close. True or false?

            Unfortunately for you, she is on the team. What do you want to do, get all the 2010 RI teams together for a jamboree, but, each team has to hold out their perceived top player, to give your little one's team a chance? That team has been coached by LR for 3 years at nefc and surf. The team has constantly changed in those 3 years with the exception of 3 current players for the 21/22 season, with a 2011 GK, and all they do is dismantle all other 2010 RI teams. Yes, if you take that one player off the team, they might only beat RI 2010 teams by 2 or 3. With her, they win by 4 or 5, every time. That is not coming close. Think about that. LR has had only 3 players since day 1, with the rest of the roster being turned over. He acquired a top player from Liverpool 2010, and the best player from Strikers 2010, not to mention last year, 4 of the top 5 bayside girls. Why would those players leave? Don't say because the coach, everyone knew Bayside was getting a new coach for the 10s, and those 4 still decided to leave. Isn't Strikers suppose to suggest their top players to Bayside when ready? Why isn't that happening? What other 2010 team in RI could come any closer to beating surf than Liverpool or Strikers, which neither of them 2 have a shot in heck? Please don't say Bayside, the conversation will be over at that point, as that game would be a double digit loss.

            Comment


              #36
              Surf, Strikers, and Ambush are the only legitimate teams in RI 10/11. Can that change eventually, absolutely 100%. As of right now, no other teams in RI that are 2010/2011 rosters will come anywhere near these 3 teams. Yes, other teams in RI have 1 or 2 that would fit right in to any of these 3 teams, but as far as teams, there is not another that is anywhere near the conversation. Fact

              Comment


                #37
                [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050687]
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post


                Unfortunately for you, she is on the team. What do you want to do, get all the 2010 RI teams together for a jamboree, but, each team has to hold out their perceived top player, to give your little one's team a chance? That team has been coached by LR for 3 years at nefc and surf. The team has constantly changed in those 3 years with the exception of 3 current players for the 21/22 season, with a 2011 GK, and all they do is dismantle all other 2010 RI teams. Yes, if you take that one player off the team, they might only beat RI 2010 teams by 2 or 3. With her, they win by 4 or 5, every time. That is not coming close. Think about that. LR has had only 3 players since day 1, with the rest of the roster being turned over. He acquired a top player from Liverpool 2010, and the best player from Strikers 2010, not to mention last year, 4 of the top 5 bayside girls. Why would those players leave? Don't say because the coach, everyone knew Bayside was getting a new coach for the 10s, and those 4 still decided to leave. Isn't Strikers suppose to suggest their top players to Bayside when ready? Why isn't that happening? What other 2010 team in RI could come any closer to beating surf than Liverpool or Strikers, which neither of them 2 have a shot in heck? Please don't say Bayside, the conversation will be over at that point, as that game would be a double digit loss.
                With that one player they will likely win every team they face. Without her doubt it.

                Comment


                  #38
                  [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050693]
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

                  With that one player they will likely win every team they face. Without her doubt it.

                  In RI, with or without her, they win. Ambush beats them without her, Strikers possibly, would be a good game. Outside RI, yes, very different outcomes with out her, I agree.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050687]
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post


                    Unfortunately for you, she is on the team. What do you want to do, get all the 2010 RI teams together for a jamboree, but, each team has to hold out their perceived top player, to give your little one's team a chance? That team has been coached by LR for 3 years at nefc and surf. The team has constantly changed in those 3 years with the exception of 3 current players for the 21/22 season, with a 2011 GK, and all they do is dismantle all other 2010 RI teams. Yes, if you take that one player off the team, they might only beat RI 2010 teams by 2 or 3. With her, they win by 4 or 5, every time. That is not coming close. Think about that. LR has had only 3 players since day 1, with the rest of the roster being turned over. He acquired a top player from Liverpool 2010, and the best player from Strikers 2010, not to mention last year, 4 of the top 5 bayside girls. Why would those players leave? Don't say because the coach, everyone knew Bayside was getting a new coach for the 10s, and those 4 still decided to leave. Isn't Strikers suppose to suggest their top players to Bayside when ready? Why isn't that happening? What other 2010 team in RI could come any closer to beating surf than Liverpool or Strikers, which neither of them 2 have a shot in heck? Please don't say Bayside, the conversation will be over at that point, as that game would be a double digit loss.
                    This is what happens when you let a fox into the henhouse. LR left Pawtucket because bc they wouldn’t let him recruit. He created Pumas for that purpose. SC agreed to it bc it is a recruiting tool for Surf. Beating on local town teams was the ploy. See Superliga trophies have their awards. Too bad other then the teams LR is involved, the rest of the Surf teams sucks. The trade off for Bayside is they got the GPS U16 boys and Surf got the U14 girls. I would say that was a nice trade for Bayside.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050772]
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

                      This is what happens when you let a fox into the henhouse. LR left Pawtucket because bc they wouldn’t let him recruit. He created Pumas for that purpose. SC agreed to it bc it is a recruiting tool for Surf. Beating on local town teams was the ploy. See Superliga trophies have their awards. Too bad other then the teams LR is involved, the rest of the Surf teams sucks. The trade off for Bayside is they got the GPS U16 boys and Surf got the U14 girls. I would say that was a nice trade for Bayside.

                      So we can agree that once again, Bayside focused on the boys side and neglected the girls side? And that's why the girls in RI should run to Surf and forget all about Bayside. BTW, LR does not coach the u14 girls team, so LR teams are not the only ones doing well at Surf.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        RI is a very small fish in a big soccer pond. Which is why my kids now play for a club in MA, where the competition and training is much more intense.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          RI is a very small fish in a big soccer pond. Which is why my kids now play for a club in MA, where the competition and training is much more intense.

                          How long did it take you to figure this out, lol

                          Comment


                            #43
                            [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050694]
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post


                            In RI, with or without her, they win. Ambush beats them without her, Strikers possibly, would be a good game. Outside RI, yes, very different outcomes with out her, I agree.
                            Fanboy creeper is back!

                            Comment


                              #44
                              [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050815]
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

                              Fanboy creeper is back!

                              Typical response from RI coach/parent. Trying to take attention off soccer, and just throwing useless jabs. You and your team do not matter and it destroys you inside.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                [QUOTE=Unregistered;3050826]
                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post


                                Typical response from RI coach/parent. Trying to take attention off soccer, and just throwing useless jabs. You and your team do not matter and it destroys you inside.
                                The above is definitely spirit-wearing fanboy! LOL Anyone with options in MA, wasting their time playing for LR is a dumb s$$t. The 07 team is coached by a parent of an 08 that plays up to the team. Talk about a conflict of interest. That team has become about one dominant player too. When she moves on, that team is in trouble.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X