Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Silence from the Left

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Silence from the Left

    As ex-Minnesota police officer Kim Potter is out on $100,000 bond, awaiting a manslaughter trial in the death of 20-year-old Daunte Wright, victims of his alleged gun violence are still reeling from trauma and top Democrats who flocked to his funeral have gone quiet.

    Wright is accused of shooting a teen and a former classmate on separate occasions in a pair of civil lawsuits against his estate.

    In May 2019, 16-year-old Caleb Livingston was at a Full Stop gas station in Minneapolis when Wright allegedly pulled out a gun and shot him in the head, according to one of the lawsuits.

    Livingston is now in a "vegetative state" known as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, according to attorney Mike Padden, who is representing both plaintiffs against Wright’s estate.

    Seven months later, Wright was charged with aggravated robbery after a young woman accused him of holding her at gunpoint, choking her and demanding she hand him hundreds of dollars.

    Wright and a friend attended a party at the home of two women, then slept over on the floor. The next morning, the victim’s roommate handed her $820 in cash for rent. After she left, Wright allegedly blocked the remaining woman in the apartment and shoved a pistol in her face.

    "Give me the f------ money," he told her, according to the criminal complaint. "I know you have it."

    Then he wrapped his fingers around her throat and "choked her while trying to pull the cash out from under her bra," she told police. She began to scream, he tried choking her again, and he eventually left empty-handed.

    Wright later violated the terms of his probation in the robbery case and was accused of waving a black handgun near a Minneapolis intersection before ditching it and fleeing on foot, eluding responding officers. When police pulled him over in April, they found he had a warrant connected with that incident and attempted to arrest him.

    Three weeks before his death, Wright and an accomplice allegedly shot former classmate Joshua Hodges in the leg and stole his car, according to the second civil lawsuit.

    The accomplice’s bullet is said to have broken his fibula, struck an artery and left permanent damage.

    Hodges was able to identify Wright because, before the carjacking, he got out of a different vehicle without a mask on – and the two made contact, according to the lawsuit. Wright allegedly masked up and proceeded anyway.

    "[Wright] was accidentally killed by a Brooklyn Center police officer on April 11, 2021, approximately three weeks after his crimes against [Hodges]," the civil complaint reads. "After that accidental death, a false narrative began establishing [Wright] as a young person that young people looked up to, when in fact a warrant was in place for his violations of law on bond for a past crime. [He] had previously chosen a life of crime."

    #2
    Just because he was a criminal doesn't mean she shouldn't be charged for killing. Cops still have to be held accountable for their actions.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Just because he was a criminal doesn't mean she shouldn't be charged for killing. Cops still have to be held accountable for their actions.
      Agreed. Why aren't those from the Left speaking out for the criminals' victims, though?

      Comment


        #4
        Silence from the Left

        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Just because he was a criminal doesn't mean she shouldn't be charged for killing. Cops still have to be held accountable for their actions.
        but criminals do not? welcome to the american liberal cesspool.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Agreed. Why aren't those from the Left speaking out for the criminals' victims, though?
          Because they are still victims of police brutality, even police shootings, that often times have nothing to do with the incident that resulted in their beating or death. Being a criminal doesn't mean you deserve to die. Being wanted for something also doesn't mean you're guilty, no? I thought in this country you were innocent until proven guilty? But if you have any kind of criminal record, even a bunch of unpaid tickets, you're automatically guilty of anything else in your eyes.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            but criminals do not? welcome to the american liberal cesspool.
            You deserve to be beaten up because you committed a crime? What if you're not even guilty, or they have the wrong person? Let the justice system do its job and keep dirty cops out of the police force.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Because they are still victims of police brutality, even police shootings, that often times have nothing to do with the incident that resulted in their beating or death. Being a criminal doesn't mean you deserve to die. Being wanted for something also doesn't mean you're guilty, no? I thought in this country you were innocent until proven guilty? But if you have any kind of criminal record, even a bunch of unpaid tickets, you're automatically guilty of anything else in your eyes.
              Do you really think you are innocent until proven guilty? We have party leaders calling for convictions without being in a courtroom and hearing evidence. We paint people in whatever light we want, get the mob behind it, and then convict by the masses.

              Nobody is defending the cop. Nobody is saying he "deserved" anything. But, why aren't his victims given a voice? Why are does the media, and the leftist mob, want us to picture an innocent person and civic leader; instead of a career criminal out to main and kill and (quite possibly) that cop as well?




              Why isn't the cop innocent until proven guilty????

              Comment


                #8
                Silence from the Left

                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                You deserve to be beaten up because you committed a crime? What if you're not even guilty, or they have the wrong person? Let the justice system do its job and keep dirty cops out of the police force.
                "You deserve to be beaten up because you committed a crime? "

                well yes, and duh, as you put it. you committed a crime, yes, you should have the crap beaten out of you.

                Perhaps, if parents disciplined their kids like back in the day.....there would be less criminals out on the streets .

                its the libs/democraps who incentivised not having 2 parents in the house raising children in low income neighborhoods.......welcome to your own liberal cesspool america.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  "You deserve to be beaten up because you committed a crime? "

                  well yes, and duh, as you put it. you committed a crime, yes, you should have the crap beaten out of you.

                  Perhaps, if parents disciplined their kids like back in the day.....there would be less criminals out on the streets .

                  its the libs/democraps who incentivised not having 2 parents in the house raising children in low income neighborhoods.......welcome to your own liberal cesspool america.
                  ^^^^ con showing he is a big believer in a culture of violence. Advocating what in modern times most consider child abuse.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    "You deserve to be beaten up because you committed a crime? "

                    well yes, and duh, as you put it. you committed a crime, yes, you should have the crap beaten out of you.

                    Perhaps, if parents disciplined their kids like back in the day.....there would be less criminals out on the streets .

                    its the libs/democraps who incentivised not having 2 parents in the house raising children in low income neighborhoods.......welcome to your own liberal cesspool america.
                    Yet violent crime has plummeted since “back in the day

                    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ecline/477408/

                    I guess your whole argument misses the boat…..as cops whomping on people and parents beating their children has decreased over the last 25 years, violent crime plunged!

                    Clean-up needed aisle 1, con!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Silence from the Left

                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      ^^^^ con showing he is a big believer in a culture of violence. Advocating what in modern times most consider child abuse.
                      there are people like you that do not believe in violence....you are protected by people that are.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        there are people like you that do not believe in violence....you are protected by people that are.
                        Oh I’m fine with violence where appropriate….in combat for example.

                        I don’t believe in it where it arises from an asymmetry of power.

                        Corporal punishment of children is a nice word some use instead of “assault.”

                        Cops are not judge and jury so any “punishment” they dish out beyond their minimal needs to do their job should land them in jail.

                        Easy peasy.

                        Cons only like violence when they are visiting it on those who can’t fight back.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Oh I’m fine with violence where appropriate….in combat for example.

                          I don’t believe in it where it arises from an asymmetry of power.

                          Corporal punishment of children is a nice word some use instead of “assault.”

                          Cops are not judge and jury so any “punishment” they dish out beyond their minimal needs to do their job should land them in jail.

                          Easy peasy.

                          Cons only like violence when they are visiting it on those who can’t fight back.
                          You mean those who can't find back, like the 16-year old who was shot in the face? The woman who was strangled? Where is your concern for those victims of violence? The dozens of innocent people assaulted daily, who are killed daily, that you are silent on? Why is only when a white person commits an act of violence that gets your fin up?

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Oh I’m fine with violence where appropriate….in combat for example.

                            I don’t believe in it where it arises from an asymmetry of power.

                            Corporal punishment of children is a nice word some use instead of “assault.”

                            Cops are not judge and jury so any “punishment” they dish out beyond their minimal needs to do their job should land them in jail.

                            Easy peasy.

                            Cons only like violence when they are visiting it on those who can’t fight back.
                            And libs are OK with the violence that cost lives, peoples lively hoods and billions in damage that took place last summer.
                            You're such a hypocrite.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              And libs are OK with the violence that cost lives, peoples lively hoods and billions in damage that took place last summer.
                              You're such a hypocrite.
                              Different poster.

                              Nope, libs are not ok with that at all. Those that were caught were arrested and are being prosecuted or have been convicted without opposition from dems. And you don't see libs trying to convince the world that the rioters were just out for a stroll and were invited in to loot. Yet con politicians, starting from Trump, have no qualms about trying to spread that very lie about the Trumpsurrectionists of January 6.

                              So con. Should the Trumpsurrectionists be punished or have they been wrongly accused? Can't wait for your deflection. Give it to us.

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X